Literature DB >> 22710640

Evolutionary molecular cytogenetics of catarrhine primates: past, present and future.

R Stanyon1, M Rocchi, F Bigoni, N Archidiacono.   

Abstract

The catarrhine primates were the first group of species studied with comparative molecular cytogenetics. Many of the fundamental techniques and principles of analysis were initially applied to comparisons in these primates, including interspecific chromosome painting, reciprocal chromosome painting and the extensive use of cloned DNA probes for evolutionary analysis. The definition and importance of chromosome syntenies and associations for a correct cladistics analysis of phylogenomic relationships were first applied to catarrhines. These early chromosome painting studies vividly illustrated a striking conservation of the genome between humans and macaques. Contemporarily, it also revealed profound differences between humans and gibbons, a group of species more closely related to humans, making it clear that chromosome evolution did not follow a molecular clock. Chromosome painting has now been applied to more that 60 primate species and the translocation history has been mapped onto the major taxonomic divisions in the tree of primate evolution. In situ hybridization of cloned DNA probes, primarily BAC-FISH, also made it possible to more precisely map breakpoints with spanning and flanking BACs. These studies established marker order and disclosed intrachromosomal rearrangements. When applied comparatively to a range of primate species, they led to the discovery of evolutionary new centromeres as an important new category of chromosome evolution. BAC-FISH studies are intimately connected to genome sequencing, and probes can usually be assigned to a precise location in the genome assembly. This connection ties molecular cytogenetics securely to genome sequencing, assuring that molecular cytogenetics will continue to have a productive future in the multidisciplinary science of phylogenomics.
Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22710640     DOI: 10.1159/000339381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res        ISSN: 1424-8581            Impact factor:   1.636


  5 in total

Review 1.  Improving genome assemblies and annotations for nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Robert B Norgren
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2013

2.  A cytogenetic and comparative map of camelid chromosome 36 and the minute in alpacas.

Authors:  Felipe Avila; Malorie P Baily; David A Merriwether; Vladimir A Trifonov; Jiři Rubes; Michelle A Kutzler; Renuka Chowdhary; Jan Janečka; Terje Raudsepp
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Eight million years of maintained heterozygosity in chromosome homologs of cercopithecine monkeys.

Authors:  Doron Tolomeo; Oronzo Capozzi; Giorgia Chiatante; Luca Sineo; Takafumi Ishida; Nicoletta Archidiacono; Mariano Rocchi; Roscoe Stanyon
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  The 14/15 association as a paradigmatic example of tracing karyotype evolution in New World monkeys.

Authors:  Oronzo Capozzi; Nicoletta Archidiacono; Nicola Lorusso; Roscoe Stanyon; Mariano Rocchi
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  The genome of the vervet (Chlorocebus aethiops sabaeus).

Authors:  Wesley C Warren; Anna J Jasinska; Raquel García-Pérez; Hannes Svardal; Chad Tomlinson; Mariano Rocchi; Nicoletta Archidiacono; Oronzo Capozzi; Patrick Minx; Michael J Montague; Kim Kyung; LaDeana W Hillier; Milinn Kremitzki; Tina Graves; Colby Chiang; Jennifer Hughes; Nam Tran; Yu Huang; Vasily Ramensky; Oi-Wa Choi; Yoon J Jung; Christopher A Schmitt; Nikoleta Juretic; Jessica Wasserscheid; Trudy R Turner; Roger W Wiseman; Jennifer J Tuscher; Julie A Karl; Jörn E Schmitz; Roland Zahn; David H O'Connor; Eugene Redmond; Alex Nisbett; Béatrice Jacquelin; Michaela C Müller-Trutwin; Jason M Brenchley; Michel Dione; Martin Antonio; Gary P Schroth; Jay R Kaplan; Matthew J Jorgensen; Gregg W C Thomas; Matthew W Hahn; Brian J Raney; Bronwen Aken; Rishi Nag; Juergen Schmitz; Gennady Churakov; Angela Noll; Roscoe Stanyon; David Webb; Francoise Thibaud-Nissen; Magnus Nordborg; Tomas Marques-Bonet; Ken Dewar; George M Weinstock; Richard K Wilson; Nelson B Freimer
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 9.043

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.