Literature DB >> 22710281

The difference between stretching and splitting muscle trauma during THA seems not to play a dominant role in influencing periprosthetic BMD changes.

William R Taylor1, Tomasz D Szwedowski, Markus O Heller, Carsten Perka, Georg Matziolis, Michael Müller, Lars Janshen, Georg N Duda.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic bone adaptation in the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty can result in reduced bone mineral density that may contribute to increased risk of aseptic loosening or fracture. Functional loading of the proximal femur postoperatively may depend upon the type of surgical muscle trauma - splitting or stretching - and is likely to influence the preservation of periprosthetic bone mineral. Since the maintenance of bone is known to be highly age and gender dependent, the aim of this study was to investigate the interplay between muscle trauma and age and gender influences on periprosthetic bone adaptation.
METHODS: Ninet y-three patients were consecutively recruited into either a transgluteal (splitting) or anterolateral (stretching) surgical approach and examined 7 days and 12 months after an elective primary hip arthroplasty (Zweymüller Alloclassic stem), using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements to quantify proximal femoral bone mineral density.
FINDINGS: The results indicate that neither gender, age nor surgical trauma type, but only the combination of age and gender, were significant predictors of postoperative remodelling rate, with younger men (<65) and older women exhibiting the largest bone atrophy.
INTERPRETATION: This study has demonstrated that the difference between stretching and splitting surgical trauma to the muscles during total hip replacement does not play a dominant role in influencing periprosthetic bone mineral changes. However, this data does suggest that certain patient populations may particularly benefit from muscle and bone preserving procedures.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22710281     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  3 in total

1.  Machine learning techniques for the optimization of joint replacements: Application to a short-stem hip implant.

Authors:  Myriam Cilla; Edoardo Borgiani; Javier Martínez; Georg N Duda; Sara Checa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Less periprosthetic bone loss following the anterolateral approach to the hip compared with the direct lateral approach.

Authors:  Terje O Ugland; Glenn Haugeberg; Svein Svenningsen; Stein H Ugland; Øystein H Berg; Are Hugo Pripp; Lars Nordsletten
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.717

3.  Anatomic grooved stem mitigates strain shielding compared to established total hip arthroplasty stem designs in finite-element models.

Authors:  Mark Heyland; Sara Checa; Daniel Kendoff; Georg N Duda
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.