Literature DB >> 22708770

Taking stock of interprofessional learning in Australia.

Louise N Greenstock1, Peter M Brooks, Gillian R Webb, Monica M Moran.   

Abstract

Changes in health service delivery and issues of quality of care and safety are driving interprofessional practice, and interprofessional learning (IPL) is now a requirement for medical school accreditation. There is international agreement that learning outcomes frameworks are required for the objectives of IPL to be fully realised, but there is debate about the most appropriate terminology. Interprofessional skills can be gained in several ways - from formal educational frameworks, at pre- and post-registration levels to work-based training. Research activity suggests that many consider that IPL delivers much-needed skills to health professionals, but some systematic reviews show that evidence of a link to patient outcomes is lacking. Australian efforts to develop an evidence base to support IPL have progressed, with new research drawing on recommendations of experts in the area. The focus has now shifted to curriculum development. The extent to which IPL is rolled out in Australian universities will depend on engagement and endorsement from curriculum managers and the broader faculty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22708770     DOI: 10.5694/mja11.10919

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  6 in total

1.  Position paper of the GMA Committee Interprofessional Education in the Health Professions - current status and outlook.

Authors:  Sylvia Kaap-Fröhlich; Gert Ulrich; Birgit Wershofen; Jonathan Ahles; Ronja Behrend; Marietta Handgraaf; Doreen Herinek; Anika Mitzkat; Heidi Oberhauser; Theresa Scherer; Andrea Schlicker; Christine Straub; Regina Waury Eichler; Bärbel Wesselborg; Matthias Witti; Marion Huber; Sebastin F N Bode
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2022-04-14

Review 2.  Perceptions of preparedness for the first medical clerkship: a systematic review and synthesis.

Authors:  Laura Surmon; Andrea Bialocerkowski; Wendy Hu
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Physiotherapy students' perspectives of online e-learning for interdisciplinary management of chronic health conditions: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Peter Gardner; Helen Slater; Joanne E Jordan; Robyn E Fary; Jason Chua; Andrew M Briggs
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Educating for interprofessional practice: moving from knowing to being, is it the final piece of the puzzle?

Authors:  Helena Ward; Lyn Gum; Stacie Attrill; Donald Bramwell; Iris Lindemann; Sharon Lawn; Linda Sweet
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Learnings and challenges to deploy an interprofessional and independent medical education programme to a new audience.

Authors:  Mieke L Van Driel; Treasure M McGuire; Richard Stark; Patrice Lazure; Tina Garcia; Lisa Sullivan
Journal:  J Eur CME       Date:  2017-11-12

6.  Another look at what teachers and students think about interprofessional learning as a shared experience in Iran: a qualitative research.

Authors:  Soleiman Ahmady; Mahboobeh Khabaz Mafinejad
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.