| Literature DB >> 22708644 |
Aran O'Loughlin1, David J Lynn, Mark McGee, Sean Doyle, Matthew McCabe, Bernadette Earley.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Weaning of beef calves is a necessary husbandry practice and involves separating the calf from its mother, resulting in numerous stressful events including dietary change, social reorganisation and the cessation of the maternal-offspring bond and is often accompanied by housing. While much recent research has focused on the physiological response of the bovine immune system to stress in recent years, little is known about the molecular mechanisms modulating the immune response. Therefore, the objective of this study was to provide new insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying the physiological response to weaning at housing in beef calves using Illumina RNA-seq.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22708644 PMCID: PMC3583219 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-250
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Figure 1 Experimental design and rectal body temperature recording and blood sampling schedule for beef calves that were housed on day (d) 0, and either (i) weaned (W: n = 8), or (ii) not weaned (controls) (C: n = 8). Rectal body temperatures were recorded and blood samples were collected on d −4, 0, 1, 2, 3, and 7 relative to housing on d 0. On d 0, samples were obtained prior to housing.
Figure 2 Bioinformatic pipeline employed in the analysis of RNA-seq data. Following sequencing on the GAII, FastQC was used to assess sequencing quality prior to aligning reads to the bovine genome with Bowtie. Counts were then assigned to each gene/exon with HTseq prior to the calculation of differential gene expression with EdgeR.
Effect of stress on haematological variables in control and weaned calves
| | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | T | S | T × S | |
| C | 13.3 ± 0.97 | 13.8 ± 1.44 | 13.9 ± 0.71 | 15.6bx ± 1.08 | 13.9x ± 0.61 | NS | NS | * | |
| (×103 cells/μL) | W | 12.2 ± 0.91 | 13.2 ± 1.34 | 12.1 ± 0.66 | 12.2y ± 1.01 | 11.3y ± 0.57 | | | |
| C | 23.7 ± 2.63 | 24.9x ± 2.30 | 28.9 ± 2.92 | 34.9b ± 3.12 | 28.9 ± 2.29 | NS | NS | *** | |
| | W | 30.9 ± 2.45 | 43.4cy ± 2.14 | 29.7 ± 2.72 | 30.1 ± 2.90 | 26.3 ± 2.14 | | | |
| C | 63.7 ± 2.87 | 63.9x ± 2.17 | 58.3 ± 2.44 | 53.3b ± 2.59 | 59.0 ± 2.50 | NS | NS | *** | |
| | W | 58.4 ± 2.67 | 44.9cy ± 2.02 | 58.8 ± 2.27 | 57.8 ± 2.41 | 64.1 ± 2.33 | | | |
| C | 0.38 ± 0.076 | 0.41x ± 0.061 | 0.52 ± 0.079 | 0.69b ± 0.098 | 0.51 ± 0.056 | NS | NS | *** | |
| | W | 0.57 ± 0.071 | 0.99cy ± 0.057 | 0.52 ± 0.074 | 0.54 ± 0.091 | 0.42 ± 0.052 | | | |
| C | 2.7 ± 0.46 | 1.9a ± 0.23 | 3.4 ± 0.86 | 3.7 ± 0.89 | 3.5 ± 1.18 | NS | NS | NS | |
| | W | 1.6 ± 0.43 | 1.9 ± 0.21 | 2.3 ± 0.79 | 1.9 ± 0.83 | 1.8 ± 1.09 | | | |
| C | 6.6 ± 0.36 | 7.1 ± 0.44 | 7.2 ± 0.39 | 6.1 ± 0.63 | 5.9 ± 0.45 | NS | NS | * | |
| | W | 7.5 ± 0.33 | 6.9 ± 0.41 | 6.9 ± 0.36 | 7.5 ± 0.59 | 5.7b ± 0.42 | | | |
| C | 11.9 ± 0.21 | 11.8 ± 0.19 | 12.3b ± 0.24 | 12.1 ± 0.27 | 12.1 ± 0.28 | NS | NS | NS | |
| (×106 cells/μL) | W | 11.6 ± 0.22 | 11.6 ± 0.21 | 11.8 ± 0.26 | 11.8 ± 0.29 | 11.8 ± 0.29 | | | |
| C | 34.6 ± 0.68 | 34.4 ± 0.69 | 35.9b ± 0.84 | 35.5 ± 0.85 | 35.3 ± 0.81 | NS | * | NS | |
| | W | 33.5 ± 0.64 | 33.4 ± 0.65 | 34.1 ± 0.78 | 34.5 ± 0.79 | 34.2 ± 0.76 | | | |
| C | 13.0 ± 0.19 | 13.1 ± 0.25 | 13.5b ± 0.28 | 13.4 ± 0.29 | 13.4 ± 0.29 | NS | * | NS | |
| | W | 12.7 ± 0.19 | 12.8 ± 0.23 | 12.9 ± 0.26 | 12.9 ± 0.28 | 12.9 ± 0.27 | | | |
| C | 37.7 ± 0.28 | 38.1b ± 0.24 | 37.7 ± 0.22 | 37.7 ± 0.23 | 37.9 ± 0.29 | NS | NS | * | |
| | W | 37.9 ± 0.26 | 38.5c ± 0.22 | 37.8 ±0.21 | 37.5a ± 0.21 | 37.7 ± 0.27 | | | |
| C | 640.1 ± 63.06 | 697.2x ± 60.73 | 700.4 ± 55.59 | 684.8 ± 57.03 | 665.2 ± 49.91 | NS | * | NS | |
| (×103 cells/μL) | W | 604.5 ± 58.79 | 469.4ay ± 56.62 | 596.4 ± 51.83 | 562.3 ± 53.17 | 536.3 ± 46.54 | |||
Haematological variables; total leukocyte, neutrophil and lymphocyte percentage, neutrophil:lymphocyte (N:L) ratio, eosinophil and monocyte percentage, red blood cell (RBC) number, haematocrit (HCT) percentage, haemoglobin (HGB) and mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration (MCHC). The values are expressed as least squares means (Lsmeans) ± s.e.
C = Control, W = Weaned, T = treatment, S = sampling time, T × S = treatment × sampling time interaction, NS = not significant (P > 0.05).
* = P < 0.05, ** = P < 0.01, *** = P < 0.001.
a,b,cWithin rows, Lsmeans differ from pre-weaning baseline by P < 0.05, P < 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively.
x,yBetween rows, Lsmeans differ between treatments by P < 0.05.
Figure 3 Physiological profiles of weaned and control calves in response to stress. Neutrophil percentage (A) rapidly increased on day 1 following weaning, indicating a profound stress response that was reciprocally matched by lymphocyte percentage (B). Platelet number (C) also decreased in response to weaning while haptoglobin (D) decreased in both weaned and control calves. * = P < 0.05, ** = P < 0.01, *** = P < 0.001 Lsmeans differ relative to baseline (Day 0). x,yLsmeans differ between location by P < 0.05.
Effect of stress on circulating cortisol and haptoglobin concentrations in control and weaned calves
| | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | T | S | T × S | |
| C | 6.1 ± 1.17 | 4.3x ± 1.36 | 8.5 ± 1.81 | 5.7 ± 1.31 | 9.7 ± 2.29 | NS | * | * | |
| (ng/mL) | W | 6.3 ± 1.09 | 8.4y ± 1.27 | 8.4 ± 1.68 | 8.4 ± 1.23 | 6.5 ± 2.14 | | | |
| C | 1.04 ± 0.052 | 1.07 ± 0.068 | 0.52b ± 0.184 | 0.30c ± 0.122 | 0.29c ± 0.076 | NS | *** | NS | |
| (mg/mL) | W | 1.02 ± 0.049 | 1.14 ± 0.063 | 1.03 ± 0.173 | 0.49b ± 0.114 | 0.39c ± 0.071 | |||
The values are expressed as least squares means (Lsmeans) ± s.e.
C = Control, W = Weaned, T = treatment, S = sampling time, T × S = treatment × sampling time interaction, NS = not significant (P > 0.05).
* = P < 0.05, ** = P < 0.01, *** = P < 0.001.
a,b,cWithin rows, Lsmeans differ from pre-weaning baseline by P < 0.05, P < 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively.
Figure 4 Venn diagram analysis of the number of differentially expressed genes between treatments. The comparison of weaned versus control calves at each time point is shown in (a) while (b) represents the comparison of differentially expressed genes from day 1, 2 and 7 to d 0 in weaned calves (response to weaning stress) and (c) shows the comparison of day 1, 2 and 7 to d 0 in control calves (response to housing stress).
Figure 5 Significant GO terms returned by GOseq analysis of genes differentially expressed between weaned and control calves. On day 2, DEG were primarily assigned to GO terms involved in extracellular matrix structure and function, particularly in the secretion of hormones, cytokines and other ligands. However, by day 7, almost of DEG identified belonged to GO terms involved in mitotic cell division. *0.2 < FDR > 0.1.
Figure 6 Significant GO terms returned by GOseq analysis of genes differentially expressed in response to weaning stress. A large number of GO terms were identified in response to weaning, predominantly involved in the extracellular region and plasma membrane. This indicates that a large number of genes were involved in cell signalling and includes a number of cytokines. The presence of the "extracellular region", "extracellular space", "extracellular matrix" and "proteinaceous extracellular matrix" on day 7 is similar to day 2 but suggests that the magnitude of the day 2 response had reduced. *0.2 < FDR > 0.1.
Figure 7 Significant GO terms returned by GOseq analysis of genes differentially expressed in response to housing stress. A similar response to weaned calves occurred in control calves on day 1 with an up-regulation of genes involved in the extracellular region. However, by day 7, there was a large down-regulation of genes in control calves, predominantly involved in the cell cycle. This is responsible for the large difference identified between treatments on day 7.
Differentially expressed exons and estimates of alternate splicing
| | | | | |
| Day 1 | 276 | 48 | 28 | 8 |
| Day 2 | 411 | 97 | 56 | 19 |
| Day 7 | 1318 | 2091 | 1217 | 689 |
| | | | | |
| Day 0 vs 1 | 353 | 227 | 190 | 160 |
| Day 0 vs 2 | 360 | 104 | 58 | 22 |
| Day 0 vs 7 | 370 | 36 | 25 | 2 |
| | | | | |
| Day 0 vs 1 | 110 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Day 0 vs 2 | 217 | 32 | 22 | 9 |
| Day 0 vs 7 | 1240 | 3921 | 1734 | 1087 |
*Non differentially expressed genes with differentially expressed exons.