Literature DB >> 22708570

Prediction of lysine post-translational modifications using bioinformatic tools.

Daniel Schwartz1.   

Abstract

Our understanding of the importance of lysine post-translational modifications in mediating protein function has led to a significant improvement in the experimental tools aimed at characterizing their existence. Nevertheless, it remains likely that at present we have only experimentally detected a small fraction of all lysine modification sites across the commonly studied proteomes. As a result, online computational tools aimed at predicting lysine modification sites have the potential to provide valuable insight to researchers developing hypotheses regarding these modifications. This chapter discusses the metrics and procedures used to assess predictive tools and surveys 11 online computational tools aimed at the prediction of the four most widely studied lysine post-translational modifications (acetylation, methylation, SUMOylation and ubiquitination). Analyses using unbiased testing data sets suggest that nine of the 11 lysine post-translational modification tools perform no better than random, or have false-positive rates which make them unusable by the experimental biologist, despite self-reported sensitivity and specificity values to the contrary. The implications of these findings for those using and creating lysine post-translational modification software are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22708570     DOI: 10.1042/bse0520165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Essays Biochem        ISSN: 0071-1365            Impact factor:   8.000


  7 in total

1.  DOME: recommendations for supervised machine learning validation in biology.

Authors:  Ian Walsh; Dmytro Fishman; Dario Garcia-Gasulla; Tiina Titma; Gianluca Pollastri; Jennifer Harrow; Fotis E Psomopoulos; Silvio C E Tosatto
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 2.  Regulation of translesion DNA synthesis: Posttranslational modification of lysine residues in key proteins.

Authors:  Justyna McIntyre; Roger Woodgate
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2015-02-18

3.  SUMOylation of the farnesoid X receptor (FXR) regulates the expression of FXR target genes.

Authors:  Natarajan Balasubramaniyan; Yuhuan Luo; An-Qiang Sun; Frederick J Suchy
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 4.  Current status of PTMs structural databases: applications, limitations and prospects.

Authors:  Alexandre G de Brevern; Joseph Rebehmed
Journal:  Amino Acids       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 3.520

5.  In silico platform for prediction of N-, O- and C-glycosites in eukaryotic protein sequences.

Authors:  Jagat Singh Chauhan; Alka Rao; Gajendra P S Raghava
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Uncovering the protein lysine and arginine methylation network in Arabidopsis chloroplasts.

Authors:  Claude Alban; Marianne Tardif; Morgane Mininno; Sabine Brugière; Annabelle Gilgen; Sheng Ma; Meryl Mazzoleni; Océane Gigarel; Jacqueline Martin-Laffon; Myriam Ferro; Stéphane Ravanel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Development of an experiment-split method for benchmarking the generalization of a PTM site predictor: Lysine methylome as an example.

Authors:  Guoyang Zou; Yang Zou; Chenglong Ma; Jiaojiao Zhao; Lei Li
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 4.475

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.