Literature DB >> 22707982

Is Customization in Antidepressant Prescribing Associated with Acute-Phase Treatment Adherence?

Elizabeth L Merrick1, Dominic Hodgkin, Lee Panas, Stephen B Soumerai, Grant Ritter.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective was to explore whether prescribing variation is associated with duration of antidepressant use during the acute phase of treatment. Improving quality of care and increasing the extent to which treatment is patient-centered and customized are interrelated goals. Prescribing variation may be considered a marker of customization, and could be associated with better antidepressant treatment adherence.
METHODS: A cross-sectional secondary data analysis examining the association between providers' antidepressant prescribing variation and patient continuity of antidepressant treatment. The data source was two states' Medicaid claims for dual-eligible Medicaid/Medicare patients. The sample included 383 patients with new episodes of antidepressant treatment, representing 70 providers with at least four patients in the sample. We tested two alternate measures of prescribing concentration: 1) share of prescriber's initial antidepressant prescribing accounted for by the two most common regimens, and 2) Herfindahl index. The HEDIS performance measure of effective acute-phase treatment (at least 84 out of 114 days with antidepressant) was the dependent variable. KEY
FINDINGS: In multivariate analyses, the concentration measure based on the top two regimens was significant and inversely related to duration adequacy (p <.05). The Herfindahl index measure showed a trend towards a similar inverse relationship (p<.10).
CONCLUSIONS: The findings provide some support for the hypothesized relationship between prescribing variation and adequate antidepressant treatment duration during the acute phase of treatment. Future work with more detailed, clinical longitudinal data could extend this inquiry to better understand the causal mechanisms using a more direct measure of customized care.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22707982      PMCID: PMC3374329          DOI: 10.1111/j.1759-8893.2011.00068.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Health Serv Res        ISSN: 1759-8885


  14 in total

Review 1.  Small numbers, big impact.

Authors:  J W Smoller; A A Nierenberg
Journal:  Harv Rev Psychiatry       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Continuity of antidepressant treatment for adults with depression in the United States.

Authors:  Mark Olfson; Steven C Marcus; Michael Tedeschi; George J Wan
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 18.112

3.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases.

Authors:  R A Deyo; D C Cherkin; M A Ciol
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Predictors of adequacy of depression management in the primary care setting.

Authors:  Jin H Joo; Francis X Solano; Benoit H Mulsant; Charles F Reynolds; Eric J Lenze
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Adherence to antidepressant treatment among privately insured patients diagnosed with depression.

Authors:  Ayse Akincigil; John R Bowblis; Carrie Levin; James T Walkup; Saira Jan; Stephen Crystal
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Custom-made versus ready-to-wear treatments: behavioral propensities in physicians' choices.

Authors:  Richard G Frank; Richard J Zeckhauser
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2007-09-06       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  Race, quality of depression care, and recovery from major depression in a primary care setting.

Authors:  Bruce L Rollman; Barbara H Hanusa; Bea Herbeck Belnap; William Gardner; Lisa A Cooper; Herbert C Schulberg
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.238

8.  Evaluation of the adequacy of outpatient antidepressant treatment.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Weilburg; Kathleen M O'Leary; James B Meigs; John Hennen; Randall S Stafford
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Measuring quality of pharmacotherapy for depression in a national health care system.

Authors:  Susan H Busch; Doug Leslie; Robert Rosenheck
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Do decision support systems influence variation in prescription?

Authors:  Judith D de Jong; Peter P Groenewegen; Peter Spreeuwenberg; Gert P Westert; Dinny H de Bakker
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  4 in total

1.  Changes in physician antipsychotic prescribing preferences, 2002-2007.

Authors:  Julie Donohue; A James O'Malley; Marcela Horvitz-Lennon; Anna Levine Taub; Ernst R Berndt; Haiden A Huskamp
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  The relationship of antidepressant prescribing concentration to treatment duration and cost.

Authors:  Dominic Hodgkin; Elizabeth L Merrick; Deirdre Hiatt
Journal:  J Ment Health Policy Econ       Date:  2012-03

3.  Patient, Physician and Organizational Influences on Variation in Antipsychotic Prescribing Behavior.

Authors:  Yan Tang; Chung-Chou H Chang; Judith R Lave; Walid F Gellad; Haiden A Huskamp; Julie M Donohue
Journal:  J Ment Health Policy Econ       Date:  2016-03

4.  Sociodemographic and clinical predictors of compliance with antidepressants for depressive disorders: systematic review of observational studies.

Authors:  Amado Rivero-Santana; Lilisbeth Perestelo-Perez; Jeanette Pérez-Ramos; Pedro Serrano-Aguilar; Carlos De Las Cuevas
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2013-03-03       Impact factor: 2.711

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.