Literature DB >> 22707556

Modeling the impact of screening policy and screening compliance on incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in the post-HPV vaccination era.

Birgitte Freiesleben de Blasio1, Aileen Rae Neilson, Marianne Klemp, Finn Egil Skjeldestad.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In Norway, pap smear screening target women aged 25-69 years on a triennial basis. The introduction of human papillomavirus (HPV) mass immunization in 2009 raises questions regarding the cost-saving future changes to current screening strategies.
METHODS: We calibrated a dynamic HPV transmission model to Norwegian data and assessed the impact of changing screening 20 or 30 years after vaccine introduction, assuming 60 or 90% vaccination coverage. Screening compliance among vaccinated women was assumed at 80 or 50%. Strategies considered: (i) 5-yearly screening of women of 25-69 years, (ii) 3-yearly screening of women of 30-69 years and (iii) 3-yearly screening of women of 25-59 years.
RESULTS: Greatest health gains were accomplished by ensuring a high vaccine uptake. In 2060, cervical cancer incidence was reduced by an estimated 36-57% compared with that of no vaccination. Stopping screening at the age of 60 years, excluding opportunistic screening, increased cervical cancer incidence by 3% (2060) compared with maintaining the current screening strategy, resulting in 1.0-2.4% extra cancers (2010-2060). The 5-yearly screening strategy elevated cervical cancer incidence by 30% resulting in 4.7-11.3% additional cancers.
CONCLUSION: High vaccine uptake in the years to come is of primary concern. Screening of young women <30 years remains important, even under the conditions of high vaccine coverage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22707556     DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fds040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)        ISSN: 1741-3842            Impact factor:   2.341


  9 in total

1.  Revisiting assumptions about age-based mixing representations in mathematical models of sexually transmitted infections.

Authors:  C W Easterly; F Alarid-Escudero; E A Enns; S Kulasingam
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Human papillomavirus knowledge, vaccine acceptance, and vaccine series completion among female entertainment and sex workers in Phnom Penh, Cambodia: the Young Women's Health Study.

Authors:  Priya Wadhera; Jennifer L Evans; Ellen Stein; Monica Gandhi; Marie-Claude Couture; Neth Sansothy; Keo Sichan; Lisa Maher; John Kaldor; Kimberly Page
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 1.359

3.  Screening adolescents and young women.

Authors:  Lori A Boardman; Katina Robison
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 4.  Systematic review of model-based cervical screening evaluations.

Authors:  Diana Mendes; Iren Bains; Tazio Vanni; Mark Jit
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Targeting human papillomavirus to reduce the burden of cervical, vulvar and vaginal cancer and pre-invasive neoplasia: establishing the baseline for surveillance.

Authors:  Mari Nygård; Bo Terning Hansen; Joakim Dillner; Christian Munk; Kristján Oddsson; Laufey Tryggvadottir; Maria Hortlund; Kai-Li Liaw; Erik J Dasbach; Susanne Krüger Kjær
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  HPV catch-up vaccination of young women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Elisabeth Couto; Ingvil Sæterdal; Lene Kristine Juvet; Marianne Klemp
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Primary cervical cancer screening with an HPV mRNA test: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sveinung Wergeland Sørbye; Silje Fismen; Tore Jarl Gutteberg; Elin Synnøve Mortensen; Finn Egil Skjeldestad
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Adherence to cervical cancer screening varies by human papillomavirus vaccination status in a high-risk population.

Authors:  Christopher A Paynter; Benjamin J Van Treeck; Inge Verdenius; Agnes W Y Lau; Twinkle Dhawan; Kayla A Lash; Elizabeth A Bergamini; Chiazotam N Ekekezie; Amna M Hilal; Kristen N James; Sadie Alongi; Sean M Harper; Aaron J Bonham; Kathy B Baumgartner; Richard N Baumgartner; Diane M Harper
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2015-07-31

9.  Accuracy of cervical cytology: comparison of diagnoses of 100 Pap smears read by four pathologists at three hospitals in Norway.

Authors:  Sveinung Wergeland Sørbye; Pål Suhrke; Berit Wallem Revå; Jannicke Berland; Ramona Johansen Maurseth; Khalid Al-Shibli
Journal:  BMC Clin Pathol       Date:  2017-08-29
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.