Literature DB >> 22707234

Osteoblasts responses to three-dimensional nanofibrous gelatin scaffolds.

Ashneet Sachar1, T Amanda Strom, Maria J Serrano, M Douglas Benson, Lynne A Opperman, Kathy K H Svoboda, Xiaohua Liu.   

Abstract

The development of suitable scaffolds for bone tissue engineering requires an in-depth understanding of the interactions between osteoblasts and scaffolding biomaterials. Although there have been a large amount of knowledge accumulated on the cell-material interactions on two-dimensional (2D) planar substrates, our understanding of how osteoblasts respond to a biomimetic nanostructured three-dimensional (3D) scaffold is very limited. In this work, we developed an approach to use confocal microscopy as an effective tool for visualizing, analyzing, and quantifying osteoblast-matrix interactions and bone tissue formation on 3D nanofibrous gelatin scaffolds (3D-NF-GS). Integrin β1, phosphor-paxillin, and vinculin were used to detect osteoblasts responses to the nanofibrous architecture of 3D-NF-GS. Unlike osteoblasts cultured on 2D substrates, osteoblasts seeded on 3D-NF-GS showed less focal adhesions for phospho-paxillin and vinculin, and the integrin β1 was difficult to detect after the first 5 days. Bone sialoprotein (BSP) expression on the 3D-NF-GS was present mainly in the cell cytoplasm at 5 days and inside secretory vesicles at 2 weeks, whereas most of the BSP on the 2D gelatin substrates was concentrated either in cell interface toward the periphery or at focal adhesion sites. Confocal images showed that osteoblasts were able to migrate throughout the 3D matrix within 5 days. By 14 days, osteoblasts were organized as nodular aggregations inside the scaffold pores and a large amount of collagen and other cell secretions covered and remodeled the surfaces of the 3D-NF-GS. These nodules were mineralized and were uniformly distributed inside the entire 3D-NF-GS after being cultured for 2 weeks. Taken together, these results give insight into osteoblast-matrix interactions in biomimetic nanofibrous 3D scaffolds and will guide the development of optimal scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22707234      PMCID: PMC3455145          DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A        ISSN: 1549-3296            Impact factor:   4.396


  42 in total

Review 1.  Exploring and engineering the cell surface interface.

Authors:  Molly M Stevens; Julian H George
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Surface modification of interconnected porous scaffolds.

Authors:  Xiaohua Liu; Youngjun Won; Peter X Ma
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 4.396

3.  Migration of tumor cells in 3D matrices is governed by matrix stiffness along with cell-matrix adhesion and proteolysis.

Authors:  Muhammad H Zaman; Linda M Trapani; Alisha L Sieminski; Alisha Siemeski; Drew Mackellar; Haiyan Gong; Roger D Kamm; Alan Wells; Douglas A Lauffenburger; Paul Matsudaira
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-07-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  The third dimension bridges the gap between cell culture and live tissue.

Authors:  Francesco Pampaloni; Emmanuel G Reynaud; Ernst H K Stelzer
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 5.  Cell-matrix adhesion.

Authors:  Allison L Berrier; Kenneth M Yamada
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 6.384

Review 6.  Development of the osteoblast phenotype: molecular mechanisms mediating osteoblast growth and differentiation.

Authors:  J B Lian; G S Stein
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  1995

7.  Porous poly(DL-lactic-co-glycolic acid)/calcium phosphate cement composite for reconstruction of bone defects.

Authors:  P Quinten Ruhé; Elizabeth L Hedberg-Dirk; Nestor Torio Padron; Paul H M Spauwen; John A Jansen; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2006-04

8.  Novel approach to fabricate porous sponges of poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) without the use of organic solvents.

Authors:  D J Mooney; D F Baldwin; N P Suh; J P Vacanti; R Langer
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Induction of osteoblast differentiation phenotype on poly(L-lactic acid) nanofibrous matrix.

Authors:  Jiang Hu; Xiaohua Liu; Peter X Ma
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Small functional groups for controlled differentiation of hydrogel-encapsulated human mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Danielle S W Benoit; Michael P Schwartz; Andrew R Durney; Kristi S Anseth
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2008-08-24       Impact factor: 43.841

View more
  9 in total

1.  3D Maskless Micropatterning for Regeneration of Highly Organized Tubular Tissues.

Authors:  Chi Ma; Tiejun Qu; Bei Chang; Yan Jing; Jerry Q Feng; Xiaohua Liu
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 9.933

2.  Immunomodulatory ECM-like Microspheres for Accelerated Bone Regeneration in Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Zhiai Hu; Chi Ma; Xin Rong; Shujuan Zou; Xiaohua Liu
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 9.229

3.  Post-transcriptional regulation in osteoblasts using localized delivery of miR-29a inhibitor from nanofibers to enhance extracellular matrix deposition.

Authors:  Eric N James; Anne M Delany; Lakshmi S Nair
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 8.947

4.  Nano-Structured Gelatin/Bioactive Glass Hybrid Scaffolds for the Enhancement of Odontogenic Differentiation of Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells.

Authors:  Tiejun Qu; Xiaohua Liu
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 6.331

5.  ECM-mimicking nanofibrous matrix coaxes macrophages toward an anti-inflammatory phenotype: Cellular behaviors and transcriptome analysis.

Authors:  Rui-Xin Wu; Chi Ma; Yongxi Liang; Fa-Ming Chen; Xiaohua Liu
Journal:  Appl Mater Today       Date:  2019-11-26

6.  Human osteoblasts within soft peptide hydrogels promote mineralisation in vitro.

Authors:  Luis A Castillo Diaz; Alberto Saiani; Julie E Gough; Aline F Miller
Journal:  J Tissue Eng       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 7.813

7.  Clinical trial and in-vitro study comparing the efficacy of treating bony lesions with allografts versus synthetic or highly-processed xenogeneic bone grafts.

Authors:  Eva Johanna Kubosch; Anke Bernstein; Laura Wolf; Tobias Fretwurst; Katja Nelson; Hagen Schmal
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Chitosan-Collagen 3D Matrix Mimics Trabecular Bone and Regulates RANKL-Mediated Paracrine Cues of Differentiated Osteoblast and Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Bone Marrow Macrophage-Derived Osteoclastogenesis.

Authors:  Jeevithan Elango; Kandasamy Saravanakumar; Saeed Ur Rahman; Yves Henrotin; Joe M Regenstein; Wenhui Wu; Bin Bao
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2019-05-05

9.  Advanced smart biomaterials and constructs for hard tissue engineering and regeneration.

Authors:  Ke Zhang; Suping Wang; Chenchen Zhou; Lei Cheng; Xianling Gao; Xianju Xie; Jirun Sun; Haohao Wang; Michael D Weir; Mark A Reynolds; Ning Zhang; Yuxing Bai; Hockin H K Xu
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 13.567

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.