Literature DB >> 22706941

Factors affecting gross efficiency in cycling.

J J de Koning1, D A Noordhof, A Lucia, C Foster.   

Abstract

There is little standardization of how to measure cycling gross efficiency (GE). Therefore, the purposes of these studies were to evaluate the effect of: i) stage duration, ii) relative exercise intensity, iii) work capacity and iv) a prior maximal incremental test on GE. Trained subjects (n=28) performed incremental tests with stage durations of 1-, 3-, and 6-min to establish the effect of stage duration and relative exercise intensity on GE. The effect of work capacity was evaluated by correlating GE with peak power output (PPO). In different subjects (n=9), GE was measured at 50% PPO with and without a prior maximal incremental test. GE was similar in 3- and 6-min stages (19.7 ± 2.8% and 19.3 ± 2.0%), but significantly higher during 1-min stages (21.1 ± 2.7%), GE increased with relative exercise intensity, up to 50% PPO or the power output corresponding to the ventilatory threshold and then remained stable. No relationship between work capacity and GE was found. Prior maximal exercise had a small effect on GE measures; GE was lower after maximal exercise. In conclusion, GE can be determined robustly so long as steady state exercise is performed and RER ≤ 1.0. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22706941     DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1306285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Med        ISSN: 0172-4622            Impact factor:   3.118


  9 in total

1.  A simplified approach for estimating the ventilatory and respiratory compensation thresholds.

Authors:  Giancarlo Condello; Ezekiel Reynolds; Carl Foster; Jos J de Koning; Erika Casolino; Megan Knutson; John P Porcari
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Aerobic and strength training in concomitant metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Conrad P Earnest; Neil M Johannsen; Damon L Swift; Fiona B Gillison; Catherine R Mikus; Alejandro Lucia; Kimberly Kramer; Carl J Lavie; Timothy S Church
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  Metabolic Flexibility and Mechanical Efficiency in Women Over-60.

Authors:  Cristina Blasco-Lafarga; Jordi Monferrer-Marín; Ainoa Roldán; Pablo Monteagudo; Ivan Chulvi-Medrano
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Effect of caffeine ingestion on anaerobic capacity quantified by different methods.

Authors:  Lucyana Arcoverde; Rodrigo Silveira; Fabiano Tomazini; André Sansonio; Romulo Bertuzzi; Adriano Eduardo Lima-Silva; Victor Amorim Andrade-Souza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Indoor Cycling Energy Expenditure: Does Sequence Matter?

Authors:  Cristina Cortis; Andrea Fusco; Mitchell Cook; Scott T Doberstein; Cordial Gillette; John P Porcari; Carl Foster
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  The Anaerobic Capacity of Cross-Country Skiers: The Effect of Computational Method and Skiing Sub-technique.

Authors:  Erik P Andersson; Dionne A Noordhof; Nestor Lögdal
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2020-04-15

7.  A Comparison between Different Methods of Estimating Anaerobic Energy Production.

Authors:  Erik P Andersson; Kerry McGawley
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Muscle Free Fatty-Acid Uptake Associates to Mechanical Efficiency During Exercise in Humans.

Authors:  Marko S Laaksonen; Heikki Kyröläinen; Jukka Kemppainen; Juhani Knuuti; Kari K Kalliokoski
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Integrated Physiological, Biomechanical, and Subjective Responses for the Selection of Assistive Level in Pedelec Cycling.

Authors:  Sheng-Chieh Yang; Yun-Ju Lee
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 4.566

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.