Literature DB >> 22706730

High sustained virologic response rates in rapid virologic response patients in the large real-world PROPHESYS cohort confirm results from randomized clinical trials.

Patrick Marcellin1, Hugo Cheinquer, Manuela Curescu, Geoffrey M Dusheiko, Peter Ferenci, Andrzej Horban, Donald Jensen, Gabriella Lengyel, Alessandra Mangia, Denis Ouzan, Massimo Puoti, Maribel Rodriguez-Torres, Mitchell L Shiffman, Manuela Schmitz, Fernando Tatsch, Mario Rizzetto.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The ability to predict which patients are most likely to achieve a sustained virologic response (SVR) with peginterferon/ribavirin would be useful in optimizing treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV). The objective of this large international noninterventional cohort study was to investigate the predictive value (PV) of a virologic response (VR) by weeks 2, 4, and 12 of treatment on SVR. Treatment-naive HCV monoinfected patients (N = 7,163) age ≥ 18 years were prescribed peginterferon/ribavirin at the discretion of the treating physician according to country-specific requirements in accordance with the local label. The main outcome measure was the PV of a VR (HCV RNA <50 IU/mL) by weeks 2, 4, and 12 of treatment for SVR24 (HCV RNA <50 IU/mL after 24 weeks of untreated follow-up) by HCV genotype. The overall SVR24 rate was 49.4% (3,541/7,163; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 48.3-50.6%). SVR24 rates in patients with an HCV RNA titer <50 IU/mL by weeks 2, 4, and 12, respectively, were 66.2% (95% CI: 60.4-71.7%), 68.4% (95% CI: 65.7-71.0%), and 60.3% (95% CI: 58.5-62.1%) among genotype 1 patients; 82.0% (95% CI: 76.8-86.5%), 76.3% (95% CI: 73.3-79.1%), and 74.2% (95% CI: 71.3-76.9%) among genotype 2 patients; 67.3% (95% CI: 61.1-73.1%), 67.3% (95% CI: 64.2-70.3%), and 63.8% (95% CI: 61.0-66.6%) among genotype 3 patients; and 59.4% (95% CI: 40.6-76.3%), 63.3% (95% CI: 54.3-71.6%), and 54.3% (95% CI: 47.5-60.9%) among genotype 4 patients. The absence of a VR by week 12 had the highest negative PV across all genotypes.
CONCLUSION: A VR by week 2 or 4 had the highest positive PV for SVR24 and differed according to HCV genotype.
Copyright © 2012 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22706730     DOI: 10.1002/hep.25892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatology        ISSN: 0270-9139            Impact factor:   17.425


  24 in total

Review 1.  Hepatitis C Virus-Genotype 3: Update on Current and Emergent Therapeutic Interventions.

Authors:  Steven W Johnson; Dorothea K Thompson; Brianne Raccor
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 2.  KASL clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatitis C.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Mol Hepatol       Date:  2016-03-28

3.  Pre-treatment prediction of response to peginterferon plus ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C genotype 3.

Authors:  Sebastián Marciano; Silvia M Borzi; Melisa Dirchwolf; Ezequiel Ridruejo; Manuel Mendizabal; Fernando Bessone; María E Sirotinsky; Diego H Giunta; Julieta Trinks; Pablo A Olivera; Omar A Galdame; Marcelo O Silva; Hugo A Fainboim; Adrián C Gadano
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-04-08

4.  Predictive value of FIB-4 and APRI versus METAVIR on sustained virologic response in genotype 1 hepatitis C patients.

Authors:  Peter Ferenci; Rodrigo Aires; Kimberly L Beavers; Manuela Curescu; Paulo R Abrão Ferreira; Michael Gschwantler; Stefan Ion; Dominique Larrey; Mojca Maticic; Massimo Puoti; János Schuller; Istvan Tornai; Anna Tusnádi; Diethelm Messinger; Fernando Tatsch; Andrzej Horban
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 6.047

Review 5.  Role of interleukin-28B polymorphism as a predictor of sustained virological response in patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with triple therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Simona Bota; Ioan Sporea; Roxana Şirli; Adriana Maria Neghină; Alina Popescu; Mihnea Străin
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 6.  Chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 virus: who should wait for treatment?

Authors:  Cristiane Valle Tovo; Angelo Alves de Mattos; Paulo Roberto Lerias de Almeida
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Consensus Statement of HCV Task Force of the Indian National Association for Study of the Liver (INASL). Part II: INASL Recommendations for Management of HCV in India.

Authors:  Pankaj Puri; Anil C Anand; Vivek A Saraswat; Subrat K Acharya; Shiv K Sarin; Radha K Dhiman; Rakesh Aggarwal; Shivaram P Singh; Deepak Amarapurkar; Anil Arora; Mohinish Chhabra; Kamal Chetri; Gourdas Choudhuri; Vinod K Dixit; Ajay Duseja; Ajay K Jain; Dharmesh Kapoor; Premashis Kar; Abraham Koshy; Ashish Kumar; Kaushal Madan; Sri P Misra; Mohan V G Prasad; Aabha Nagral; Amarendra S Puri; R Jeyamani; Sanjiv Saigal; Samir Shah; Praveen K Sharma; Ajit Sood; Sandeep Thareja; Manav Wadhawan
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2014-06-24

8.  Meta-analysis: influence of host and viral factors in patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 4 treated with pegylated interferon and ribavirin.

Authors:  Brittany E Yee; Nghia H Nguyen; Bing Zhang; Philip Vutien; Carrie R Wong; Glen A Lutchman; Mindie H Nguyen
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.566

9.  Sustained virological response and its treatment predictors in hepatitis C virus genotype 4 compared to genotypes 1, 2, and 3: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Brittany E Yee; Nghia H Nguyen; Bing Zhang; Derek Lin; Philip Vutien; Carrie R Wong; Glen A Lutchman; Mindie H Nguyen
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07-09

10.  Hepatitis C Virus Treatment Revolution: Eastern European Story.

Authors:  Carol Stanciu; Anca Trifan
Journal:  Hepat Mon       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 0.660

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.