OBJECTIVES: There is an increasing call for a stronger consideration of impairment in instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) in the diagnostic criteria of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) to improve the prediction of dementia. Thus, the aim of the study was to determine the predictive capability of MCI and IADL impairment for incident dementia. DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort study with four assessments at 1.5-year intervals over a period of 4.5 years. SETTING: : Primary care medical record registry sample. PARTICIPANTS: As part of the German Study on Ageing, Cognition, and Dementia in Primary Care Patients, a sample of 3,327 patients from general practitioners, aged 75 years and older, was assessed. MEASUREMENTS: The predictive capability of MCI and IADL impairment for incident dementia was analysed using receiver operating characteristics, Kaplan-Meier survival analyses, and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: MCI and IADL impairment were found to be significantly associated with higher conversion to, shorter time to, and better predictive power for future dementia. Regarding IADL, a significant impact was particularly found for impairment in responsibility for one's own medication, shopping, and housekeeping, and in the ability to use public transport. CONCLUSIONS: Combining MCI with IADL impairment significantly improves the prediction of future dementia. Even though information on a set of risk factors is required to achieve a predictive accuracy for dementia in subjects with MCI being clinically useful, IADL impairment should be a very important element of such a risk factor set. 2012 American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry
OBJECTIVES: There is an increasing call for a stronger consideration of impairment in instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) in the diagnostic criteria of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) to improve the prediction of dementia. Thus, the aim of the study was to determine the predictive capability of MCI and IADL impairment for incident dementia. DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort study with four assessments at 1.5-year intervals over a period of 4.5 years. SETTING: : Primary care medical record registry sample. PARTICIPANTS: As part of the German Study on Ageing, Cognition, and Dementia in Primary Care Patients, a sample of 3,327 patients from general practitioners, aged 75 years and older, was assessed. MEASUREMENTS: The predictive capability of MCI and IADL impairment for incident dementia was analysed using receiver operating characteristics, Kaplan-Meier survival analyses, and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: MCI and IADL impairment were found to be significantly associated with higher conversion to, shorter time to, and better predictive power for future dementia. Regarding IADL, a significant impact was particularly found for impairment in responsibility for one's own medication, shopping, and housekeeping, and in the ability to use public transport. CONCLUSIONS: Combining MCI with IADL impairment significantly improves the prediction of future dementia. Even though information on a set of risk factors is required to achieve a predictive accuracy for dementia in subjects with MCI being clinically useful, IADL impairment should be a very important element of such a risk factor set. 2012 American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry
Authors: Nathan E Brummel; Susan P Bell; Timothy D Girard; Pratik P Pandharipande; James C Jackson; Alessandro Morandi; Jennifer L Thompson; Rameela Chandrasekhar; Gordon R Bernard; Robert S Dittus; Thomas M Gill; E Wesley Ely Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Rosebud O Roberts; David S Knopman; Michelle M Mielke; Ruth H Cha; V Shane Pankratz; Teresa J H Christianson; Yonas E Geda; Bradley F Boeve; Robert J Ivnik; Eric G Tangalos; Walter A Rocca; Ronald C Petersen Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-12-18 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Martina Minnerop; Delia Kurzwelly; Holger Wagner; Anne S Soehn; Jennifer Reichbauer; Feifei Tao; Tim W Rattay; Michael Peitz; Kristina Rehbach; Alejandro Giorgetti; Angela Pyle; Holger Thiele; Janine Altmüller; Dagmar Timmann; Ilker Karaca; Martina Lennarz; Jonathan Baets; Holger Hengel; Matthis Synofzik; Burcu Atasu; Shawna Feely; Marina Kennerson; Claudia Stendel; Tobias Lindig; Michael A Gonzalez; Rüdiger Stirnberg; Marc Sturm; Sandra Roeske; Johanna Jung; Peter Bauer; Ebba Lohmann; Stefan Herms; Stefanie Heilmann-Heimbach; Garth Nicholson; Muhammad Mahanjah; Rajech Sharkia; Paolo Carloni; Oliver Brüstle; Thomas Klopstock; Katherine D Mathews; Michael E Shy; Peter de Jonghe; Patrick F Chinnery; Rita Horvath; Jürgen Kohlhase; Ina Schmitt; Michael Wolf; Susanne Greschus; Katrin Amunts; Wolfgang Maier; Ludger Schöls; Peter Nürnberg; Stephan Zuchner; Thomas Klockgether; Alfredo Ramirez; Rebecca Schüle Journal: Brain Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Robinson Ramírez-Vélez; Mikel Izquierdo; Antonio García-Hermoso; Leidy T Ordoñez-Mora; Carlos Cano-Gutierrez; Florelba Campo-Lucumí; Miguel Ángel Pérez-Sousa Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-07-12 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: David S Knopman; Alexa Beiser; Mary M Machulda; Julie Fields; Rosebud O Roberts; V Shane Pankratz; Jeremiah Aakre; Ruth H Cha; Walter A Rocca; Michelle M Mielke; Bradley F Boeve; Sherral Devine; Robert J Ivnik; Rhoda Au; Sanford Auerbach; Philip A Wolf; Sudha Seshadri; Ronald C Petersen Journal: Neurology Date: 2015-10-09 Impact factor: 9.910