BACKGROUND: This study aimed to document the clinical practices and attitudes of health care providers in South Africa and Zimbabwe on male circumcision for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention. METHODS: We conducted national surveys of physicians and nurses in both countries in 2008-2009 (N = 1444). Data on male circumcision for HIV prevention were analyzed; outcomes were patient counseling, provision of services, and desire for training. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine associations between these outcomes and clinician, practice, and attitudinal variables. RESULTS: Overall, 57% of clinicians reported counseling male patients on male circumcision, 17% were offering services (49% referrals), and 61% desired training. In the multivariable analyses, provision of services was more common in South Africa (P ≤ 0.001) but desire for training higher in Zimbabwe (P ≤ 0.01). Provision of services was highest among physicians (P ≤ 0.01) and in hospital settings (P ≤ 0.001). However, nurses had greater desire for training (P ≤ 0.05) as did younger clinicians (P ≤ 0.001). Clinicians in rural and clinic settings were just as likely to express training interest. Clinician attitudes that patients would be upset due to cultural beliefs and would increase risky behaviors were associated with less counseling and service provision (P ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Many clinicians in South Africa and Zimbabwe showed willingness to integrate new HIV prevention evidence into practice and to become trained to offer the procedure to patients. Results suggest that both countries should consider involving nurses in male circumcision for HIV prevention, including those in rural areas, and should help clinicians to address cultural concerns.
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to document the clinical practices and attitudes of health care providers in South Africa and Zimbabwe on male circumcision for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention. METHODS: We conducted national surveys of physicians and nurses in both countries in 2008-2009 (N = 1444). Data on male circumcision for HIV prevention were analyzed; outcomes were patient counseling, provision of services, and desire for training. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine associations between these outcomes and clinician, practice, and attitudinal variables. RESULTS: Overall, 57% of clinicians reported counseling male patients on male circumcision, 17% were offering services (49% referrals), and 61% desired training. In the multivariable analyses, provision of services was more common in South Africa (P ≤ 0.001) but desire for training higher in Zimbabwe (P ≤ 0.01). Provision of services was highest among physicians (P ≤ 0.01) and in hospital settings (P ≤ 0.001). However, nurses had greater desire for training (P ≤ 0.05) as did younger clinicians (P ≤ 0.001). Clinicians in rural and clinic settings were just as likely to express training interest. Clinician attitudes that patients would be upset due to cultural beliefs and would increase risky behaviors were associated with less counseling and service provision (P ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Many clinicians in South Africa and Zimbabwe showed willingness to integrate new HIV prevention evidence into practice and to become trained to offer the procedure to patients. Results suggest that both countries should consider involving nurses in male circumcision for HIV prevention, including those in rural areas, and should help clinicians to address cultural concerns.
Authors: Ronald H Gray; Godfrey Kigozi; David Serwadda; Frederick Makumbi; Stephen Watya; Fred Nalugoda; Noah Kiwanuka; Lawrence H Moulton; Mohammad A Chaudhary; Michael Z Chen; Nelson K Sewankambo; Fred Wabwire-Mangen; Melanie C Bacon; Carolyn F M Williams; Pius Opendi; Steven J Reynolds; Oliver Laeyendecker; Thomas C Quinn; Maria J Wawer Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-02-24 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Robert C Bailey; Stephen Moses; Corette B Parker; Kawango Agot; Ian Maclean; John N Krieger; Carolyn F M Williams; Richard T Campbell; Jeckoniah O Ndinya-Achola Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-02-24 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Xavier Castellsagué; F Xavier Bosch; Nubia Muñoz; Chris J L M Meijer; Keerti V Shah; Silvia de Sanjose; José Eluf-Neto; Corazon A Ngelangel; Saibua Chichareon; Jennifer S Smith; Rolando Herrero; Victor Moreno; Silvia Franceschi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-04-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J Morse; T Chipato; K Blanchard; T Nhemachena; G Ramjee; C McCulloch; M Blum; E Saleeby; C C Harper Journal: BJOG Date: 2013-05-31 Impact factor: 6.531
Authors: David MacLaren; Rachael Tommbe; Tracie Mafile'o; Clement Manineng; Federica Fregonese; Michelle Redman-MacLaren; Michael Wood; Kelwyn Browne; Reinhold Muller; John Kaldor; William John McBride Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-09-09 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Jane T Bertrand; Dino Rech; Dickens Omondi Aduda; Sasha Frade; Mores Loolpapit; Michael D Machaku; Mathews Oyango; Webster Mavhu; Alexandra Spyrelis; Linnea Perry; Margaret Farrell; Delivette Castor; Emmanuel Njeuhmeli Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-05-06 Impact factor: 3.240