Literature DB >> 22705708

Assessment of genotoxic potential of Cr(VI) in the mouse duodenum: an in silico comparison with mutagenic and nonmutagenic carcinogens across tissues.

Chad M Thompson1, J Gregory Hixon, Deborah M Proctor, Laurie C Haws, Mina Suh, Jonathan D Urban, Mark A Harris.   

Abstract

In vitro studies on hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] indicate that reduced forms of this metal can interact with DNA and cause mutations. Recently, Cr(VI) was shown to induce intestinal tumors in mice; however, Cr(VI) elicited redox changes, cytotoxicity and hyperplasia - suggesting involvement of tissue injury rather than direct mutagenesis. Moreover, toxicogenomic analyses indicated limited evidence for DNA damage responses. Herein, we extend these toxicogenomic analyses by comparing the gene expression patterns elicited by Cr(VI) with those of four mutagenic and four nonmutagenic carcinogens. To date, toxicogenomic profiles for mutagenic and nonmutagenic duodenal carcinogens do not exist, thus duodenal gene changes in mice were compared to those elicited by hepatocarcinogens. Specifically, duodenal gene changes in mice following exposure to Cr(VI) in drinking water were compared to hepatic gene changes previously identified as potentially discriminating mutagenic and nonmutagenic hepatocarcinogens. Using multivariate statistical analyses (including logistic regression classification), the Cr(VI) gene responses clustered apart from mutagenic carcinogens and closely with nonmutagenic carcinogens. These findings are consistent with other intestinal data supporting a nonmutagenic mode of action (MOA). These findings may be useful as part of a full weight of evidence MOA evaluation for Cr(VI)-induced intestinal carcinogenesis. Limitations to this analysis will also be discussed.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22705708     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.05.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  6 in total

1.  Technical guide for applications of gene expression profiling in human health risk assessment of environmental chemicals.

Authors:  Julie A Bourdon-Lacombe; Ivy D Moffat; Michelle Deveau; Mainul Husain; Scott Auerbach; Daniel Krewski; Russell S Thomas; Pierre R Bushel; Andrew Williams; Carole L Yauk
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2015-05-02       Impact factor: 3.271

2.  Mechanisms of Chromium-Induced Toxicity.

Authors:  Thomas L DesMarais; Max Costa
Journal:  Curr Opin Toxicol       Date:  2019-05-17

Review 3.  Assessment of the mode of action underlying development of rodent small intestinal tumors following oral exposure to hexavalent chromium and relevance to humans.

Authors:  Chad M Thompson; Deborah M Proctor; Mina Suh; Laurie C Haws; Christopher R Kirman; Mark A Harris
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.635

4.  Different ATM Signaling in Response to Chromium(VI) Metabolism via Ascorbate and Nonascorbate Reduction: Implications for in Vitro Models and Toxicogenomics.

Authors:  Michal W Luczak; Samantha E Green; Anatoly Zhitkovich
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Effects of chromium picolinate on fat deposition, activity and genetic expression of lipid metabolism-related enzymes in 21 day old Ross broilers.

Authors:  Guangxin Chen; Zhenhua Gao; Wenhui Chu; Zan Cao; Chunyi Li; Haiping Zhao
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.509

6.  A chronic oral reference dose for hexavalent chromium-induced intestinal cancer.

Authors:  Chad M Thompson; Christopher R Kirman; Deborah M Proctor; Laurie C Haws; Mina Suh; Sean M Hays; J Gregory Hixon; Mark A Harris
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.446

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.