Monika Muzslay1, Ginny Moore, Jane F Turton, A Peter Wilson. 1. Department of Microbiology, University College London Hospitals, National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, UK. monika.muzslay@uclh.nhs.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Colonized or infected patients pose a significant risk to noncolonized patients occupying the same room. The aim of this study was to investigate how far Enterococcus spp can spread from isolated and nonisolated patients. METHODS: Conventional microbiological methods were used to recover enterococci from the air and from 62 high-contact sites located within the near-patient and wider ward environment. Samples were collected twice weekly for 17 weeks. The similarity between isolates was determined via pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. RESULTS: Vancomycin-susceptible enterococci (VSE) were recovered from 352 of 2,046 environmental surfaces (17.2%) and from 27 of 66 air samples (40.9%). During study week 14, VSE was recovered from 75 of the 124 surfaces sampled, representing 21.3% of all VSE-positive sites. A gentamicin-resistant VS Enterococcus faecium clone was recovered in high numbers from the air (>100 cfu/m(3)) and from surfaces throughout a 4-bed bay. The same clone was recovered from an adjacent isolation room as well. A total of 55 surfaces were contaminated with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). The environment of 2 isolated patients accounted for 85% of contaminated sites. Neither patient was known to be VRE-positive. CONCLUSIONS: Unrecognized colonization and/or the aerosolization of enterococci together with inadequate cleaning can lead to heavy, widespread, and persistent environmental contamination. All pose a significant risk for acquisition of antibiotic-resistant enterococci.
BACKGROUND: Colonized or infectedpatients pose a significant risk to noncolonized patients occupying the same room. The aim of this study was to investigate how far Enterococcus spp can spread from isolated and nonisolated patients. METHODS: Conventional microbiological methods were used to recover enterococci from the air and from 62 high-contact sites located within the near-patient and wider ward environment. Samples were collected twice weekly for 17 weeks. The similarity between isolates was determined via pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. RESULTS:Vancomycin-susceptible enterococci (VSE) were recovered from 352 of 2,046 environmental surfaces (17.2%) and from 27 of 66 air samples (40.9%). During study week 14, VSE was recovered from 75 of the 124 surfaces sampled, representing 21.3% of all VSE-positive sites. A gentamicin-resistant VS Enterococcus faecium clone was recovered in high numbers from the air (>100 cfu/m(3)) and from surfaces throughout a 4-bed bay. The same clone was recovered from an adjacent isolation room as well. A total of 55 surfaces were contaminated with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). The environment of 2 isolated patients accounted for 85% of contaminated sites. Neither patient was known to be VRE-positive. CONCLUSIONS: Unrecognized colonization and/or the aerosolization of enterococci together with inadequate cleaning can lead to heavy, widespread, and persistent environmental contamination. All pose a significant risk for acquisition of antibiotic-resistant enterococci.
Authors: M Khalid Ijaz; Bahram Zargar; Kathryn E Wright; Joseph R Rubino; Syed A Sattar Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2016-09-02 Impact factor: 2.918