BACKGROUND:Bisphosphonates are thought to act through the osteoclast by changing bone microenvironment. Previous findings of adjuvant clodronate trials in different populations with operable breast cancer have been mixed. The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) protocol B-34 aims to ascertain whether oral clodronate can improve outcomes in women with primary breast cancer. METHODS: NSABP B-34 is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in 3323 women with stage 1-3 breast cancer. After surgery to remove the tumour, patients were stratified by age, axillary nodes, and oestrogen and progesterone receptor status and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either oral clodronate 1600 mg daily for 3 years (n=1662) or placebo (1661). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival, analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00009945. FINDINGS: Median follow-up was 90·7 months (IQR 82·7-100·0) and 3311 patients had data for this period. Disease-free survival did not differ between groups (286 events in the clodronate group vs 312 in the placebo group; hazard ratio 0·91, 95% CI 0·78-1·07; p=0·27). Moreover, no differences were recorded for overall survival (0·84, 0·67-1·05; p=0·13), recurrence-free interval (0·83, 0·67-1·04; p=0·10), or bone metastasis-free interval (0·77, 0·55-1·07; p=0·12). Non-bone metastasis-free interval was slightly increased with clodronate (0·74, 0·55-1·00; p=0·047). Analyses in women age 50 years or older on study entry showed benefits of clodronate for recurrence-free interval (0·75, 0·57-0·99; p=0·045), bone metastasis-free interval (0·62, 0·40-0·95; p=0·027), and non-bone metastasis-free interval (0·63, 0·43-0·91; p=0·014), but not for overall survival (0·80, 0·61-1·04, p=0·094). Adherence to treatment at 3 years was 56% for the clodronate group and 60% for the placebo group. Grade 3 or higher liver dysfunction was noted in 23 of 1612 patients in the clodronate group and 12 of 1623 patients in the placebo group; grade 3-4 diarrhoea was noted in 28 patients in the clodronate group and in ten in the placebo group. There was one possible case of osteonecrosis of the jaw in the clodronate group. INTERPRETATION: Findings of NSABP B-34 suggest that bisphosphonates might have anticancer benefits for older postmenopausal women. A meta-analysis of adjuvant bisphosphonate trials is suggested before recommendations for use in non-osteoporotic postmenopausal women with primary breast cancer are made. FUNDING: National Cancer Institute, Bayer Oy (formerly Schering Oy).
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Bisphosphonates are thought to act through the osteoclast by changing bone microenvironment. Previous findings of adjuvant clodronate trials in different populations with operable breast cancer have been mixed. The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) protocol B-34 aims to ascertain whether oral clodronate can improve outcomes in women with primary breast cancer. METHODS: NSABP B-34 is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in 3323 women with stage 1-3 breast cancer. After surgery to remove the tumour, patients were stratified by age, axillary nodes, and oestrogen and progesterone receptor status and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either oral clodronate 1600 mg daily for 3 years (n=1662) or placebo (1661). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival, analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00009945. FINDINGS: Median follow-up was 90·7 months (IQR 82·7-100·0) and 3311 patients had data for this period. Disease-free survival did not differ between groups (286 events in the clodronate group vs 312 in the placebo group; hazard ratio 0·91, 95% CI 0·78-1·07; p=0·27). Moreover, no differences were recorded for overall survival (0·84, 0·67-1·05; p=0·13), recurrence-free interval (0·83, 0·67-1·04; p=0·10), or bone metastasis-free interval (0·77, 0·55-1·07; p=0·12). Non-bone metastasis-free interval was slightly increased with clodronate (0·74, 0·55-1·00; p=0·047). Analyses in women age 50 years or older on study entry showed benefits of clodronate for recurrence-free interval (0·75, 0·57-0·99; p=0·045), bone metastasis-free interval (0·62, 0·40-0·95; p=0·027), and non-bone metastasis-free interval (0·63, 0·43-0·91; p=0·014), but not for overall survival (0·80, 0·61-1·04, p=0·094). Adherence to treatment at 3 years was 56% for the clodronate group and 60% for the placebo group. Grade 3 or higher liver dysfunction was noted in 23 of 1612 patients in the clodronate group and 12 of 1623 patients in the placebo group; grade 3-4 diarrhoea was noted in 28 patients in the clodronate group and in ten in the placebo group. There was one possible case of osteonecrosis of the jaw in the clodronate group. INTERPRETATION: Findings of NSABP B-34 suggest that bisphosphonates might have anticancer benefits for older postmenopausal women. A meta-analysis of adjuvant bisphosphonate trials is suggested before recommendations for use in non-osteoporotic postmenopausal women with primary breast cancer are made. FUNDING: National Cancer Institute, Bayer Oy (formerly Schering Oy).
Authors: T J Powles; E McCloskey; A H Paterson; S Ashley; V A Tidy; A Nevantaus; K Rosenqvist; J Kanis Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1998-05-06 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Trevor Powles; Sandy Paterson; John A Kanis; Eugene McCloskey; Sue Ashley; Alwynne Tidy; Kirsi Rosenqvist; Ian Smith; Lars Ottestad; Sandra Legault; Marjo Pajunen; Auli Nevantaus; Esa Männistö; Anne Suovuori; Sari Atula; Jaakko Nevalainen; Liisa Pylkkänen Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-08-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: I J Diel; E F Solomayer; S D Costa; C Gollan; R Goerner; D Wallwiener; M Kaufmann; G Bastert Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1998-08-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: A Goldhirsch; R D Gelber; K N Price; M Castiglione; A S Coates; C M Rudenstam; J Collins; J Lindtner; A Hacking; G Marini Journal: Lancet Date: 1994-02-12 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Robert E Coleman; Helen Marshall; David Cameron; David Dodwell; Roger Burkinshaw; Maccon Keane; Miguel Gil; Stephen J Houston; Robert J Grieve; Peter J Barrett-Lee; Diana Ritchie; Julia Pugh; Claire Gaunt; Una Rea; Jennifer Peterson; Claire Davies; Victoria Hiley; Walter Gregory; Richard Bell Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-09-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Trevor Powles; Alexander Paterson; Eugene McCloskey; Phil Schein; Bobbi Scheffler; Alwynne Tidy; Sue Ashley; Ian Smith; Lars Ottestad; John Kanis Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2006-03-15 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Brent O'Carrigan; Matthew Hf Wong; Melina L Willson; Martin R Stockler; Nick Pavlakis; Annabel Goodwin Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-10-30
Authors: Julie R Gralow; William E Barlow; Alexander H G Paterson; Jieling L M'iao; Danika L Lew; Alison T Stopeck; Daniel F Hayes; Dawn L Hershman; Mark M Schubert; Mark Clemons; Catherine H Van Poznak; Elizabeth C Dees; James N Ingle; Carla I Falkson; Anthony D Elias; Michael J Messino; Jeffrey H Margolis; Shaker R Dakhil; Helen K Chew; Kim Z Dammann; Jeffrey S Abrams; Robert B Livingston; Gabriel N Hortobagyi Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Manuel Valdivieso; Benjamin W Corn; Janet E Dancey; D Lawrence Wickerham; L Elise Horvath; Edith A Perez; Alison Urton; Walter M Cronin; Erica Field; Evonne Lackey; Charles D Blanke Journal: Semin Oncol Date: 2015-07-10 Impact factor: 4.929
Authors: Windy Dean-Colomb; Kenneth R Hess; Elliana Young; Terrie G Gornet; Beverly C Handy; Stacy L Moulder; Nuhad Ibrahim; Lajos Pusztai; Daniel Booser; Vicente Valero; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Francisco J Esteva Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2012-12-15 Impact factor: 4.872