Literature DB >> 22704444

Tissue engineered tubular construct for urinary diversion in a preclinical porcine model.

Paul Geutjes1, Luc Roelofs, Henk Hoogenkamp, Mariëlle Walraven, Barbara Kortmann, Robert de Gier, Fawzy Farag, Dorien Tiemessen, Marije Sloff, Egbert Oosterwijk, Toin van Kuppevelt, Willeke Daamen, Wout Feitz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The ileal conduit has been considered the gold standard urinary diversion for patients with bladder cancer and pediatric patients. Complications are mainly related to the use of gastrointestinal tissue. Tissue engineering may be the technical platform on which to develop alternatives to gastrointestinal tissue. We developed a collagen-polymer conduit and evaluated its applicability for urinary diversion in pigs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tubular constructs 12 cm long and 15 mm in diameter were prepared from bovine type I collagen and Vypro® II synthetic polymer mesh. Characterized tubes were sterilized, seeded with and without primary porcine bladder urothelial cells, and implanted as an incontinent urostomy using the right ureter in 10 female Landrace pigs. At 1 month the newly formed tissue structure was functionally and microscopically evaluated by loopogram and immunohistochemistry, respectively.
RESULTS: The survival rate was 80% with 1 related and 1 unrelated death. By 1 month the collagen was resorbed and a retroperitoneal tunnel had formed that withstood 40 cm H(2)O water pressure. In 5 cases the tunnel functioned as a urostomy. Histological analysis revealed a moderate immune response, neovascularization and urothelial cells in the construct lumen. The polymer mesh provoked fibroblast deposition and tissue contraction. No major differences were observed between cellular and acellular constructs.
CONCLUSIONS: After implanting the tubular constructs a retroperitoneal tunnel was formed that functioned as a urinary conduit in most cases. Improved large tubular scaffolds may generate alternatives to gastrointestinal tissue for urinary diversion.
Copyright © 2012 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22704444     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.03.119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  11 in total

Review 1.  Tissue-engineered urinary conduits.

Authors:  Max Kates; Anirudha Singh; Hotaka Matsui; Gary D Steinberg; Norm D Smith; Mark P Schoenberg; Trinity J Bivalacqua
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Recent advances in ureteral tissue engineering.

Authors:  Paul K J D de Jonge; Vasileios Simaioforidis; Paul J Geutjes; Egbert Oosterwijk; Wout F J Feitz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Porcine Small Intestinal Submucosa (SIS) as a Suitable Scaffold for the Creation of a Tissue-Engineered Urinary Conduit: Decellularization, Biomechanical and Biocompatibility Characterization Using New Approaches.

Authors:  Martina Casarin; Tiago Moderno Fortunato; Saima Imran; Martina Todesco; Deborah Sandrin; Giulia Borile; Ilaria Toniolo; Massimo Marchesan; Gino Gerosa; Andrea Bagno; Filippo Romanato; Emanuele Luigi Carniel; Alessandro Morlacco; Fabrizio Dal Moro
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 4.  Artificial urinary conduit construction using tissue engineering methods.

Authors:  Tomasz Kloskowski; Marta Pokrywczyńska; Tomasz Drewa
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2014-12-31

5.  Transplantation of autologous minced bladder mucosa for a one-step reconstruction of a tissue engineered bladder conduit.

Authors:  Gisela Reinfeldt Engberg; Johan Lundberg; Clara Ibel Chamorro; Agneta Nordenskjöld; Magdalena Fossum
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 6.  Tissue engineering in animal models for urinary diversion: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marije Sloff; Rob de Vries; Paul Geutjes; Joanna IntHout; Merel Ritskes-Hoitinga; Egbert Oosterwijk; Wout Feitz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Ureter regeneration-the proper scaffold has to be defined.

Authors:  Tomasz Kloskowski; Arkadiusz Jundziłł; Tomasz Kowalczyk; Maciej Nowacki; Magdalena Bodnar; Andrzej Marszałek; Marta Pokrywczyńska; Małgorzata Frontczak-Baniewicz; Tomasz A Kowalewski; Piotr Chłosta; Tomasz Drewa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Visualisation of newly synthesised collagen in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Corien Oostendorp; Peter J E Uijtdewilligen; Elly M Versteeg; Theo G Hafmans; Ellen H van den Bogaard; Paul K J D de Jonge; Ali Pirayesh; Johannes W Von den Hoff; Ernst Reichmann; Willeke F Daamen; Toin H van Kuppevelt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The Impact of γ-Irradiation and EtO Degassing on Tissue Remodeling of Collagen-based Hybrid Tubular Templates.

Authors:  Marije Sloff; Heinz P Janke; Paul K J D de Jonge; Dorien M Tiemessen; Barbara B M Kortmann; Silvia M Mihaila; Paul J Geutjes; Wout F J Feitz; Egbert Oosterwijk
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2018-07-25

Review 10.  Concise Review: Tissue Engineering of Urinary Bladder; We Still Have a Long Way to Go?

Authors:  Jan Adamowicz; Marta Pokrywczynska; Shane Vontelin Van Breda; Tomasz Kloskowski; Tomasz Drewa
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 6.940

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.