| Literature DB >> 22704348 |
Chris J McNeil, John H Beattie, M-J Gordon, Lynn P Pirie, Susan J Duthie.
Abstract
Low folate intake is associated with vascular disease. Causality has been attributed to hyperhomocysteinemia. However, human intervention trials have failed to show the benefit of homocysteine-lowering therapies. Alternatively, low folate may promote vascular disease by deregulating DNA methylation. We investigated whether folate could alter DNA methylation and atherosclerosis in ApoE null mice. Mice were fed one of six diets (n = 20 per group) for 16 weeks. Basal diets were either control (C; 4% lard) or high fat (HF; 21% lard and cholesterol, 0.15%) with different B-vitamin compositions: (1) folic acid and B-vitamin replete, (2) folic acid deficient (-F), (3) folic acid, B6 and B12 deficient (-F-B). -F diets decreased plasma (up to 85%; P < 0.05), whole blood (up to 70%; P < 0.05), and liver folate (up to 65%; P < 0.05) and hepatic SAM/SAH (up to 80%; P < 0.05). -F-B diets reduced plasma (up to 76%; P < 0.05), whole blood (up to 72%; P < 0.05), and liver B12 (up to 39%; P < 0.05) and hepatic SAM/SAH (up to 90%; P < 0.05). -F increased homocysteine 2-fold, while -F-B increased homocysteine 3.6- and 6.8-fold in the C and HF groups (P < 0.05). Plaque formation was increased 2-fold (P < 0.0001) in mice fed a HF diet. Feeding a HF-F diet increased lesion formation by 17% (P < 0.05). There was no change in 5-methyldeoxycytidine in liver or vascular tissue (aorta, periadventitial tissue and heart). These data suggest that atherogenesis is not associated with genome-wide epigenetic changes in this animal model.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22704348 PMCID: PMC3365600 DOI: 10.1007/s13148-011-0022-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Epigenetics ISSN: 1868-7075 Impact factor: 6.551
Composition of experimental diets (grams per kilogram)
| Diet | Control fat (C) | High fat (HF) |
|---|---|---|
| Casein | 140 | 140 |
| Cellulose | 50 | 50 |
| Corn starch | 466 | 296 |
| Cholesterol | 0 | 1.5 |
| Choline bitartrate | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| Cystine | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| Lard | 0 | 170 |
| Maltodextrin | 155 | 155 |
| Sucrose | 100 | 100 |
| Soya bean oil | 40 | 40 |
| TBHQ antioxidant | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Mineral mix (AIN-93M-Mx) | 35 | 35 |
| Vitamin mix (AIN-93-VX) | 10 | 10 |
Composition of vitamin mix (grams per kilogram)
| C/HF | −F | −F−B | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Folic acid | 0.2 | 0 | 0 |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0 |
| Vitamin B12 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 0 |
Fig. 1The effect of folic acid, B vitamins and fat intake on growth. Results are mean body weight ± SEM after 16 weeks on experimental diet for n = 17–20 animals per group. Data not sharing superscript letters differ by P < 0.05
Indices of methyl donor status in blood and tissues from ApoE mice fed a control (C) or high fat (HF) diet depleted of folic acid (F−) or folic acid and vitamins B6 and B12 (F−B−) for 16 weeks
| Control fat | High fat | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | C−F | C−F−B | HF | HF−F | HF−F−B | |
| Plasma folate (ng/ml) | 87.8 ± 4.8a | 16.2 ± 1.5b | 14.9 ± 0.9b | 104.9 ± 5.5c | 15.5 ± 1.7b | 15.0 ± 1.4b |
| Whole blood folate (ng/ml) | 498.9 ± 42.9a | 163.5 ± 8.9b | 184.7 ± 6.8b | 507.9 ± 26.0a | 149.6 ± 9.7b | 193.3 ± 18.7b |
| Liver folate (ng/mg protein) | 106.0 ± 8.0a | 47.1 ± 2.8b | 50.2 ± 3.6b | 117.1 ± 8.3a | 42.0 ± 2.3b | 41.1 ± 1.6b |
| Plasma B12 (ng/mg) | 24.8 ± 2.3a | 15.3 ± 1.0b | 6.8 ± 0.1c | 25.6 ± 3.0a | 12.5 ± 0.5d | 6.1 ± 0.5c |
| Whole blood B12 (ng/ml) | 22.5 ± 1.0a,c | 22.0 ± 0.6a,c | 7.2 ± 0.7b | 24.9 ± 1.6a | 20.5 ± 1.1c | 6.9 ± 1.0b |
| Liver B12 (ng/g protein) | 1.49 ± 0.05a | 1.43 ± 0.11a | 0.96 ± 0.04b | 1.38 ± 0.09a | 1.18 ± 0.09c | 0.84 ± 0.04b |
| Liver SAM (nmol/g tissue) | 100.2 ± 9.2a | 50.7 ± 4.0b | 43.7 ± 2.6c | 84.1 ± 4.7d | 47.6 ± 6.7b | 36.1 ± 1.8c |
| Liver SAH (nmol/g tissue) | 50.4 ± 2.3a | 71.6 ± 3.1b | 86.1 ± 4.3c | 47.6 ± 3.1a | 68.1 ± 3.8b | 89.7 ± 4.4c |
Values are means ± SEM for n = 10 mice sampled per group. Data not sharing superscript letters differ by P < 0.05
Fig. 2The effect of folic acid, B vitamins and fat intake on the ratio of hepatic SAM to SAH. Results are means ± SEM for n = 10 animals per group. Data not sharing superscript letters differ by P < 0.05
Fig. 3The effect of folic acid, B vitamins and fat intake on plasma homocysteine. Results are means ± SEM for n = 10 animals per group. Data not sharing superscript letters differ by P < 0.05
Fig. 4The effect of folic acid, B vitamins and fat intake on aortic plaque development. Results are means ± SEM for n = 20 animals per group. Data not sharing superscript letters differ by P < 0.05
Global DNA methylation in tissues from ApoE mice fed a control (C) or high fat (HF) diet depleted of folic acid (−F) or folic acid and vitamins B6 and B12 (−F−B) for 16 weeks
| Global DNA methylation | Control fat | High fat | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | C−F | C−F−B | HF | HF−F | HF−F−B | ||
| Aorta | 5-methyldeoxycytidine (ng/μg DNA) | 125.5 ± 8.2 (6) | 135.7 ± 7.7 (6) | 134.4 ± 22. (6) | 116.6 ± 11.5 (6) | 123.7 ± 7.8 (6) | 133.2 ± 15.7 (6) |
| DNA methylation (%) | 3.72 ± 0.06 (6) | 3.61 ± 0.05 (6) | 3.62 ± 0.07 (6) | 3.60 ± 0.05 (6) | 3.57 ± 0.04 (6) | 3.58 ± 0.07 (6) | |
| Heart | 5-methyldeoxycytidine (ng/μg DNA) | 158.9 ± 10.9 (6) | 135.3 ± 4.8 (6) | 130.8 ± 3.7 (6) | 134.7 ± 6.1 (6) | 157.0 ± 13.4 (6) | 148.8 ± 9.8 (6) |
| DNA methylation (%) | 3.8 ± 0.08 (6) | 3.68 ± 0.11 (6) | 3.75 ± 0.04 (6) | 3.79 ± 0.05 (6) | 3.85 ± 0.12 (6) | 3.81 ± 0.05 (6) | |
| Aorta tunica adventitia | 5-methyldeoxycytidine (ng/μg DNA) | 137.9 ± 12.2 (9) | 141.0 ± 8.6 (10) | 184.9 ± 22.3 (10) | 171.5 ± 13.0 (8) | 149.7 ± 20.1 (9) | 157.8 ± 16.2 (7) |
| DNA methylation (%) | 4.05 ± 0.11 (10) | 3.94 ± 0.15 (10) | 4.25 ± 0.10 (10) | 4.31 ± 0.12 (8) | 3.99 ± 0.10 (9) | 3.98 ± 0.13 (7) | |
| Liver | 5-methyldeoxycytidine (ng/μg DNA) | 68.1 ± 5.5 (10) | 66.6 ± 4.7 (10) | 71.4 ± 5.3 (10) | 71.5 ± 5.9 (10) | 68.4 ± 6.5 (10) | 67.6 ± 6.6 (10) |
| DNA methylation (%) | 3.19 ± 0.04 (10) | 3.20 ± 0.04 (10) | 3.21 ± 0.05 (10) | 3.21 ± 0.05 (10) | 3.20 ± 0.06 (10) | 3.21 ± 0.05 (10) | |
Values are means ± SEM with the number of mice sampled per group in parentheses