Literature DB >> 22704314

Surgical margin status does not affect overall survival following radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience with expectant management.

Mark S Soloway1, Viacheslav Iremashvili, Michael A Gorin, Ahmed Eldefrawy, Ramgopal Satyanarayana, Murugesan Manoharan.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this report is to describe the oncologic outcomes of men with margin-positive prostate cancer who were managed expectantly following radical prostatectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1992 and January 2011, 2166 men underwent an open radical prostatectomy by a single surgeon. Of these patients, 1592 (74%) had complete data and met the inclusion criteria of negative lymph nodes and no history of neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. This cohort was dichotomized by the presence or absence of at least one positive surgical margin. Groups were compared for differences in recurrence-free and overall survival.
RESULTS: In total, 507 (32%) of 1592 patients had at least one positive surgical margin. Clinical and pathological characteristics of these patients indicated more aggressive disease. The median follow up for biochemical recurrence and overall survival was 3.4 years and 7.7 years, respectively. Of those patients with a positive margin, 147 (29%) recurred, with estimated 5 and 10 year biochemical recurrence rates of 31% and 47%, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the presence of a positive margin was associated with a 2.45-fold increased hazard of recurrence (p < 0.001). Despite initial observation, surgical margin status was not associated with a decrease in overall survival on both uni- (p = 0.684) and multivariate analyses (p = 0.177).
CONCLUSION: Although a positive surgical margin is associated with an increased risk of biochemical recurrence, patients in our series were not at an increased risk of all-cause mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22704314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Urol        ISSN: 1195-9479            Impact factor:   1.344


  3 in total

1.  Capsular incision in normal prostatic tissue during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a new concept or a waste of time?

Authors:  Nicolas Koutlidis; Céline Duperron; Mathilde Funes de la Vega; Eric Mourey; Frédéric Michel; Luc Cormier
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Concern for overtreatment using the AUA/ASTRO guideline on adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jung Hun Kang; Yun-Sok Ha; Sung Kim; Jihyeong Yu; Neal Patel; Jaspreet S Parihar; Amirali Hassanzadeh Salmasi; Wun-Jae Kim; Isaac Yi Kim
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 2.264

3.  Effect of Preoperative Risk Group Stratification on Oncologic Outcomes of Patients with Adverse Pathologic Findings at Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Won Sik Jang; Lawrence H C Kim; Cheol Yong Yoon; Koon Ho Rha; Young Deuk Choi; Sung Joon Hong; Won Sik Ham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.