Literature DB >> 22704056

The PRO-SELF(©) Pain Control Program improves patients' knowledge of cancer pain management.

Tone Rustøen1, Berit Taraldsen Valeberg, Eva Kolstad, Erik Wist, Steven Paul, Christine Miaskowski.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Inadequate knowledge is one barrier to effective cancer pain management.
OBJECTIVES: This study's aim was to evaluate the effects of a psychoeducational intervention (the Norwegian version of the PRO-SELF(©) Pain Control Program) compared with a control group in increasing patients' knowledge of cancer pain management.
METHODS: Adult oncology outpatients with pain from bone metastasis of 2.5 or greater on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale were randomized into the PRO-SELF (n=87) or control (n=92) groups. Patients completed a demographic questionnaire and the Pain Experience Scale (PES) at the beginning and end of the study to assess their knowledge and attitudes. The six-week intervention consisted of education, skills building, and nurse coaching. Mixed-model analyses with tests of a group×time interaction were done for each of the individual items and total PES scores to evaluate between-group differences in changes in knowledge over time.
RESULTS: Except for functional status, no differences were found between the PRO-SELF and control groups on any baseline demographic, clinical, or pain characteristics. Significant group×time interactions were found for all the single item and total PES scores. Compared with the control group, patients in the PRO-SELF group had significant increases in knowledge scores.
CONCLUSION: The use of a knowledge and attitude survey, like the PES, as part of a psychoeducational intervention provides an effective foundation for patient education in cancer pain management. This individualized approach to education about pain management may save staff time and improve patient outcomes.
Copyright © 2012 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22704056     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.09.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  12 in total

1.  Adherence to Analgesics for Cancer Pain: A Comparative Study of African Americans and Whites Using an Electronic Monitoring Device.

Authors:  Salimah H Meghani; Aleda M L Thompson; Jesse Chittams; Deborah W Bruner; Barbara Riegel
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2015-06-14       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 2.  Understanding the cancer pain experience.

Authors:  Judith A Schreiber
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2014

Review 3.  Self-management education interventions for patients with cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Doris Howell; Tamara Harth; Judy Brown; Cathy Bennett; Susan Boyko
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Development of the opioid self-management scale for advanced Cancer patients with pain and examination of its validity and reliability.

Authors:  Shiori Yoshida; Fumiko Sato; Keita Tagami; Rie Sasaki; Chikako Takahashi; Konosuke Sasaki; Shin Takahashi
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 3.113

Review 5.  Cancer pain management: what's new?

Authors:  Jan Gaertner; Christine Schiessl
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2013-04

6.  Determinants of pain severity changes in ambulatory patients with cancer: an analysis from Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial E2Z02.

Authors:  Fengmin Zhao; Victor T Chang; Charles Cleeland; James F Cleary; Edith P Mitchell; Lynne I Wagner; Michael J Fisch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Effectiveness of caregiver interventions for people with cancer and non-cancer-related chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Toby O Smith; Matthew Pearson; Matthew J Smith; Jessica Fletcher; Lisa Irving; Sarah Lister
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2021-06-17

8.  Randomized clinical trial to evaluate a cancer pain self-management intervention for outpatients.

Authors:  Sabine Valenta; Christine Miaskowski; Rebecca Spirig; Kathrin Zaugg; Kris Denhaerynck; Horst Rettke; Elisabeth Spichiger
Journal:  Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2022-01-21

Review 9.  Diagnosis and treatment of bone metastasis: comprehensive guideline of the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology, Japanese Orthopedic Association, Japanese Urological Association, and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.

Authors:  H Shibata; S Kato; I Sekine; K Abe; N Araki; H Iguchi; T Izumi; Y Inaba; I Osaka; S Kato; A Kawai; S Kinuya; M Kodaira; E Kobayashi; T Kobayashi; J Sato; N Shinohara; S Takahashi; Y Takamatsu; K Takayama; K Takayama; U Tateishi; H Nagakura; M Hosaka; H Morioka; T Moriya; T Yuasa; T Yurikusa; K Yomiya; M Yoshida
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2016-03-16

Review 10.  How can we help family carers manage pain medicines for patients with advanced cancer? A systematic review of intervention studies.

Authors:  Sue Latter; Jane B Hopkinson; Alison Richardson; Jane A Hughes; Elizabeth Lowson; Deborah Edwards
Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 3.568

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.