Literature DB >> 22702346

What do Islamic institutional fatwas say about medical and research confidentiality and breach of confidentiality?

Ghiath Alahmad1, Kris Dierickx.   

Abstract

Protecting confidentiality is an essential value in all human relationships, no less in medical practice and research.(1) Doctor-patient and researcher-participant relationships are built on trust and on the understanding those patients' secrets will not be disclosed.(2) However, this confidentiality can be breached in some situations where it is necessary to meet a strong conflicting duty.(3) Confidentiality, in a general sense, has received much interest in Islamic resources including the Qur'an, Sunnah and juristic writings. However, medical and research confidentiality have not been explored deeply. There are few fatwas about the issue, despite an increased effort by both individuals and Islamic medical organizations to use these institutional fatwas in their research. Infringements on confidentiality make up a significant portion of institutional fatwas, yet they have never been thoroughly investigated. Moreover, the efforts of organizations and authors in this regard still require further exploration, especially on the issue of research confidentiality. In this article, we explore medical and research confidentiality and potential conflicts with this practice as a result of fatwas released by international, regional, and national Islamic Sunni juristic councils. We discuss how these fatwas affect research and publication by Muslim doctors, researchers, and Islamic medical organizations. We argue that more specialized fatwas are needed to clarify Islamic juristic views about medical and research confidentiality, especially the circumstances in which infringements on this confidentiality are justified.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22702346     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2012.00329.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev World Bioeth        ISSN: 1471-8731            Impact factor:   2.294


  6 in total

1.  Knowledge and attitude of Saudi health professions' students regarding patient's bill of rights.

Authors:  Salwa B El-Sobkey; Alyah M Almoajel; May N Al-Muammar
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2014-07-30

2.  Knowledge, perceptions and attitude of Egyptian physicians towards biobanking issues.

Authors:  Ahmed Samir Abdelhafiz; Eman A Sultan; Hany H Ziady; Douaa M Sayed; Walaa A Khairy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Review of national research ethics regulations and guidelines in Middle Eastern Arab countries.

Authors:  Ghiath Alahmad; Mohammad Al-Jumah; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 2.652

4.  What Egyptians think. Knowledge, attitude, and opinions of Egyptian patients towards biobanking issues.

Authors:  Ahmed S Abdelhafiz; Eman A Sultan; Hany H Ziady; Ebtesam Ahmed; Walaa A Khairy; Douaa M Sayed; Rana Zaki; Merhan A Fouda; Rania M Labib
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  Researchers views about perceived harms and benefits of gene editing: A study from the MENA region.

Authors:  Sawsan Abuhammad; Omar F Khabour; Karem H Alzoubi
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-04-23

Review 6.  Doctor-patient relationship. Islamic perspective.

Authors:  Hassan Chamsi-Pasha; Mohammed A Albar
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.484

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.