Literature DB >> 2270186

Effects of background symmetry on same-different pattern matching: a compromise-criteria account.

R W Proctor1, T Van Zandt, H D Watson.   

Abstract

Two experiments are reported, which were designed to test predictions of an account of same-different matching that assumes that bilaterally symmetric backgrounds provide extraneous evidence toward same, whereas asymmetric backgrounds provide evidence toward different. When all backgrounds within a block of trials are of the same type, appropriate adjustments of response criteria can be made to accommodate the irrelevant evidence and thus maintain acceptable levels of accuracy. However, when backgrounds of different types are mixed randomly, compromise criteria are adopted. This compromise-criteria account predicts distinctive interaction patterns for reaction times when blocked versus mixed presentations of various background types are compared. The predicted interactions were obtained for asymmetric- and no-noise backgrounds in Experiment 1 and for symmetric-, asymmetric-, and no-noise backgrounds in Experiment 2. The findings support the general view that extraneous display attributes are weighted into the evidence for same and different, with criteria settings used that minimize errors under the noisiest conditions.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2270186     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211600

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  11 in total

1.  Testing the role of vertical symmetry in letter matching.

Authors:  H E Egeth; H H Brownell; L D Geoffrion
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Same-different judgments of foveal and parafoveal letter pairs by older adults.

Authors:  L E Krueger; P A Allen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-04

3.  Effect of irrelevant surrounding material on speed of same-different judgment of two adjacent letters.

Authors:  L E Krueger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1973-05

4.  Effect of bracketing lines on speed of "same"-"different" judgment of two adjacent letters.

Authors:  L E Krueger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1970-05

5.  More on the speed and accuracy of positive and negative responses.

Authors:  R Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Instructional and probability manipulations of bias in multiletter matching.

Authors:  R W Proctor; D J Weeks
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-01

7.  Effect of intermixed foveal and parafoveal presentation on same-different judgments: evidence for a criterion-inertia model.

Authors:  L E Krueger
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-03

8.  A theory of perceptual matching.

Authors:  L E Krueger
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  The effects of objective and perceived size properties on visual form matching.

Authors:  H D Watson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1981-12

10.  Interitem structure and the facilitation of simultaneous comparison.

Authors:  J T Richards
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  4 in total

1.  A comparison of two response time models applied to perceptual matching.

Authors:  T Van Zandt; H Colonius; R W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-06

2.  Same-different judgments of multiletter strings: insensitivity to positional bias and spacing.

Authors:  R W Proctor; A F Healy; T Van Zandt
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-01

3.  Nominal and physical decision criteria in same-different judgments.

Authors:  Z Eviatar; E Zaidel; T Wickens
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-07

4.  On the automaticity of relational stimulus processing: The (extrinsic) relational Simon task.

Authors:  Adriaan Spruyt; Jan De Houwer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.