Madeleine M Grigg-Damberger1. 1. University of New Mexico School of Medicine, MSC 10 5620, One University of NM, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131-0001, USA. MGriggD@salud.unm.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Review published studies and critiques which evaluate the impact and effects of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) Sleep Scoring Manual in the four years since its publication. FINDINGS: USING THE AASM MANUAL RULES TO SCORE SLEEP AND EVENTS IN A POLYSOMNOGRAM (PSG) RESULTS IN: (1) very large differences in apnea-hypopnea indexes (AHI) when using the recommended and alternative rule for scoring hypopneas in adults; (2) increases in NREM 1 and sleep stage shifts with compensatory decreases in NREM 2 in children and adults when following rule 5.C.b. for ending NREM 2 sleep; (3) increases in NREM 3 in adults scoring slow wave activity in the frontal EEG derivations; (4) improved interscorer reliability; and (5) successfully identified fragmented sleep in children with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) from primary snorers or normal controls because they had more NREM 1 and stage shifts using rule 5.C.b. Criticism of the Manual most often cited: (1) two rules for scoring hypopneas; (2) alternative EEG montage cancellation effects; (3) scoring stages 3 and 4 as NREM 3; and (4) too few rules for scoring arousals and REM sleep without atonia. SUMMARY: Four years have passed since the AASM Scoring Manual was published with far less criticism than those who developed it feared. The AASM Manual provides a foundation upon which we all can build rules and methods which identify the complexity of sleep and its disorders.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Review published studies and critiques which evaluate the impact and effects of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) Sleep Scoring Manual in the four years since its publication. FINDINGS: USING THE AASM MANUAL RULES TO SCORE SLEEP AND EVENTS IN A POLYSOMNOGRAM (PSG) RESULTS IN: (1) very large differences in apnea-hypopnea indexes (AHI) when using the recommended and alternative rule for scoring hypopneas in adults; (2) increases in NREM 1 and sleep stage shifts with compensatory decreases in NREM 2 in children and adults when following rule 5.C.b. for ending NREM 2 sleep; (3) increases in NREM 3 in adults scoring slow wave activity in the frontal EEG derivations; (4) improved interscorer reliability; and (5) successfully identified fragmented sleep in children with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) from primary snorers or normal controls because they had more NREM 1 and stage shifts using rule 5.C.b. Criticism of the Manual most often cited: (1) two rules for scoring hypopneas; (2) alternative EEG montage cancellation effects; (3) scoring stages 3 and 4 as NREM 3; and (4) too few rules for scoring arousals and REM sleep without atonia. SUMMARY: Four years have passed since the AASM Scoring Manual was published with far less criticism than those who developed it feared. The AASM Manual provides a foundation upon which we all can build rules and methods which identify the complexity of sleep and its disorders.
Entities:
Keywords:
AASM standard; Sleep scoring parameters; polysomnography/classification/standards; practice guidelines as topic sleep apnea; practice guidelines as topic sleep scoring
Authors: Sabine Scholle; Uta Beyer; Michael Bernhard; Stephan Eichholz; Thomas Erler; Petra Graness; Barbara Goldmann-Schnalke; Katharina Heisch; Frank Kirchhoff; Karsten Klementz; Gerhard Koch; Annmarie Kramer; Christoph Schmidtlein; Barbara Schneider; Birgit Walther; Alfred Wiater; Hans Christoph Scholle Journal: Sleep Med Date: 2011-05-20 Impact factor: 3.492
Authors: Warren R Ruehland; Fergal J O'Donoghue; Robert J Pierce; Andrew T Thornton; Parmjit Singh; Janet M Copland; Bronwyn Stevens; Peter D Rochford Journal: Sleep Date: 2011-01-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Susan Redline; Rohit Budhiraja; Vishesh Kapur; Carole L Marcus; Jason H Mateika; Reena Mehra; Sariam Parthasarthy; Virend K Somers; Kingman P Strohl; Loreto G Sulit; David Gozal; Merrill S Wise; Stuart F Quan Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2007-03-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Graziela De Luca Canto; Camila Pachêco-Pereira; Secil Aydinoz; Paul W Major; Carlos Flores-Mir; David Gozal Journal: Sleep Med Rev Date: 2014-11-28 Impact factor: 11.609
Authors: Amit Chopra; Molly Jung; Robert C Kaplan; David W Appel; Elizabeth A Dinces; Sumitrajit Dhar; Phyllis C Zee; Franklyn Gonzalez; David J Lee; Alberto R Ramos; Howard J Hoffman; Susan Redline; Karen J Cruickshanks; Neomi A Shah Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2016-05-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Richard B Berry; Rohit Budhiraja; Daniel J Gottlieb; David Gozal; Conrad Iber; Vishesh K Kapur; Carole L Marcus; Reena Mehra; Sairam Parthasarathy; Stuart F Quan; Susan Redline; Kingman P Strohl; Sally L Davidson Ward; Michelle M Tangredi Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2012-10-15 Impact factor: 4.062