BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Hypoxic tissue evaluation in glioma is important for predicting treatment response and establishing antihypoxia therapy. In this preliminary study, (62)Cu-ATSM PET was used to determine its validity as a biomarker for distinguishing tumor grade and tissue hypoxia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: (62)Cu-ATSM PET was performed in 22 patients with glioma, and the (62)Cu-ATSM SUV(max) and T/B ratio were semiquantitatively evaluated. (62)Cu-ATSM uptake distribution was qualitatively evaluated and compared with MR imaging findings. HIF-1α expression, a hypoxia marker, was compared with (62)Cu-ATSM uptake values. RESULTS: The (62)Cu-ATSM SUV(max) and T/B ratio were significantly higher in grade IV than in grade III gliomas (P = .014 and .018, respectively), whereas no significant differences were found between grade III and grade II gliomas. At a T/B ratio cutoff threshold of 1.8, (62)Cu-ATSM uptake was predictive of HIF-1α expression, with 92.3% sensitivity and 88.9% specificity. The mean T/B ratio was also significantly higher in HIF-1α-positive glioma tissue than in HIF-1α-negative tissue (P = .001). Using this optimal threshold of T/B ratio, (62)Cu-ATSM PET showed regional uptake in 61.9% (13/21) of tumors within the contrast-enhanced region on MR imaging, which was significantly correlated with presence of a necrotic component (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated that (62)Cu-ATSM uptake is relatively high in grade IV gliomas and correlates with the MR imaging findings of necrosis. Moreover, the (62)Cu-ATSM T/B ratio showed significant correlation with HIF-1α expression. Thus, (62)Cu-ATSM appears to be a suitable biomarker for predicting highly malignant grades and tissue hypoxia in patients with glioma.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Hypoxic tissue evaluation in glioma is important for predicting treatment response and establishing antihypoxia therapy. In this preliminary study, (62)Cu-ATSM PET was used to determine its validity as a biomarker for distinguishing tumor grade and tissue hypoxia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: (62)Cu-ATSM PET was performed in 22 patients with glioma, and the (62)Cu-ATSM SUV(max) and T/B ratio were semiquantitatively evaluated. (62)Cu-ATSM uptake distribution was qualitatively evaluated and compared with MR imaging findings. HIF-1α expression, a hypoxia marker, was compared with (62)Cu-ATSM uptake values. RESULTS: The (62)Cu-ATSM SUV(max) and T/B ratio were significantly higher in grade IV than in grade III gliomas (P = .014 and .018, respectively), whereas no significant differences were found between grade III and grade II gliomas. At a T/B ratio cutoff threshold of 1.8, (62)Cu-ATSM uptake was predictive of HIF-1α expression, with 92.3% sensitivity and 88.9% specificity. The mean T/B ratio was also significantly higher in HIF-1α-positive glioma tissue than in HIF-1α-negative tissue (P = .001). Using this optimal threshold of T/B ratio, (62)Cu-ATSM PET showed regional uptake in 61.9% (13/21) of tumors within the contrast-enhanced region on MR imaging, which was significantly correlated with presence of a necrotic component (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated that (62)Cu-ATSM uptake is relatively high in grade IV gliomas and correlates with the MR imaging findings of necrosis. Moreover, the (62)Cu-ATSM T/B ratio showed significant correlation with HIF-1α expression. Thus, (62)Cu-ATSM appears to be a suitable biomarker for predicting highly malignant grades and tissue hypoxia in patients with glioma.
Authors: Joseph A O'Donoghue; Pat Zanzonico; Andrei Pugachev; Bixiu Wen; Peter Smith-Jones; Shangde Cai; Eva Burnazi; Ronald D Finn; Paul Burgman; Shutian Ruan; Jason S Lewis; Michael J Welch; C Clifton Ling; John L Humm Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2005-04-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: A Obata; E Yoshimi; A Waki; J S Lewis; N Oyama; M J Welch; H Saji; Y Yonekura; Y Fujibayashi Journal: Ann Nucl Med Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 2.668
Authors: T Kato; J Shinoda; N Nakayama; K Miwa; A Okumura; H Yano; S Yoshimura; T Maruyama; Y Muragaki; T Iwama Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2008-04-03 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Peter Birner; Matthias Preusser; Ellen Gelpi; Johannes Berger; Brigitte Gatterbauer; Inge M Ambros; Peter F Ambros; Till Acker; Karl H Plate; Adrian L Harris; Johannes A Hainfellner Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-10-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Farrokh Dehdashti; Perry W Grigsby; Jason S Lewis; Richard Laforest; Barry A Siegel; Michael J Welch Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2008-01-16 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Philip V Little; Fabian Arnberg; Emma Jussing; Li Lu; Andreas Ingemann Jensen; Nicholas Mitsios; Jan Mulder; Thuy A Tran; Staffan Holmin Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2020-05-19 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Connie Yip; Philip J Blower; Vicky Goh; David B Landau; Gary J R Cook Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-02-21 Impact factor: 9.236