Literature DB >> 22700544

Pulse-labelling trees to study carbon allocation dynamics: a review of methods, current knowledge and future prospects.

Daniel Epron1, Michael Bahn, Delphine Derrien, Fernando Alfredo Lattanzi, Jukka Pumpanen, Arthur Gessler, Peter Högberg, Pascale Maillard, Masako Dannoura, Dominique Gérant, Nina Buchmann.   

Abstract

Pulse-labelling of trees with stable or radioactive carbon (C) isotopes offers the unique opportunity to trace the fate of labelled CO(2) into the tree and its release to the soil and the atmosphere. Thus, pulse-labelling enables the quantification of C partitioning in forests and the assessment of the role of partitioning in tree growth, resource acquisition and C sequestration. However, this is associated with challenges as regards the choice of a tracer, the methods of tracing labelled C in tree and soil compartments and the quantitative analysis of C dynamics. Based on data from 47 studies, the rate of transfer differs between broadleaved and coniferous species and decreases as temperature and soil water content decrease. Labelled C is rapidly transferred belowground-within a few days or less-and this transfer is slowed down by drought. Half-lives of labelled C in phloem sap (transfer pool) and in mature leaves (source organs) are short, while those of sink organs (growing tissues, seasonal storage) are longer. (13)C measurements in respiratory efflux at high temporal resolution provide the best estimate of the mean residence times of C in respiratory substrate pools, and the best basis for compartmental modelling. Seasonal C dynamics and allocation patterns indicate that sink strength variations are important drivers for C fluxes. We propose a conceptual model for temperate and boreal trees, which considers the use of recently assimilated C versus stored C. We recommend best practices for designing and analysing pulse-labelling experiments, and identify several topics which we consider of prime importance for future research on C allocation in trees: (i) whole-tree C source-sink relations, (ii) C allocation to secondary metabolism, (iii) responses to environmental change, (iv) effects of seasonality versus phenology in and across biomes, and (v) carbon-nitrogen interactions. Substantial progress is expected from emerging technologies, but the largest challenge remains to carry out in situ whole-tree labelling experiments on mature trees to improve our understanding of the environmental and physiological controls on C allocation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22700544     DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tps057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tree Physiol        ISSN: 0829-318X            Impact factor:   4.196


  28 in total

1.  The allocation of assimilated carbon to shoot growth: in situ assessment in natural grasslands reveals nitrogen effects and interspecific differences.

Authors:  Xiao Ying Gong; Germán Darío Berone; Mónica Graciela Agnusdei; Ricardo Manuel Rodríguez Palma; Rudi Schäufele; Fernando Alfredo Lattanzi
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Carbon and nitrogen fluxes between beech and their ectomycorrhizal assemblage.

Authors:  Kerttu Valtanen; Verena Eissfeller; Friderike Beyer; Dietrich Hertel; Stefan Scheu; Andrea Polle
Journal:  Mycorrhiza       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.387

3.  Rhizosphere activity in an old-growth forest reacts rapidly to changes in soil moisture and shapes whole-tree carbon allocation.

Authors:  Jobin Joseph; Decai Gao; Bernhard Backes; Corinne Bloch; Ivano Brunner; Gerd Gleixner; Matthias Haeni; Henrik Hartmann; Günter Hoch; Christian Hug; Ansgar Kahmen; Marco M Lehmann; Mai-He Li; Jörg Luster; Martina Peter; Christian Poll; Andreas Rigling; Kaisa A Rissanen; Nadine K Ruehr; Matthias Saurer; Marcus Schaub; Leonie Schönbeck; Benjamin Stern; Frank M Thomas; Roland A Werner; Willy Werner; Thomas Wohlgemuth; Frank Hagedorn; Arthur Gessler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Intraseasonal carbon sequestration and allocation in larch trees growing on permafrost in Siberia after 13C labeling (two seasons of 2013-2014 observation).

Authors:  Oxana Masyagina; Anatoly Prokushkin; Alexander Kirdyanov; Aleksey Artyukhov; Tatiana Udalova; Sergey Senchenkov; Aleksey Rublev
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Enhanced leaf turnover and nitrogen recycling sustain CO2 fertilization effect on tree-ring growth.

Authors:  Ying Guo; Lin Zhang; Liu Yang; Wei Shen; Yude Pan; Ian J Wright; Yiqi Luo; Tianxiang Luo
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 19.100

6.  Stable isotope approaches and opportunities for improving plant conservation.

Authors:  Keirith A Snyder; Sharon A Robinson; Susanne Schmidt; Kevin R Hultine
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Whole-plant allocation to storage and defense in juveniles of related evergreen and deciduous shrub species.

Authors:  T P Wyka; P Karolewski; R Żytkowiak; P Chmielarz; J Oleksyn
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 4.196

8.  Long-term ¹³C labeling provides evidence for temporal and spatial carbon allocation patterns in mature Picea abies.

Authors:  Manuel Mildner; Martin K-F Bader; Sebastian Leuzinger; Rolf T W Siegwolf; Christian Körner
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Responses of belowground carbon allocation dynamics to extended shading in mountain grassland.

Authors:  Michael Bahn; Fernando A Lattanzi; Roland Hasibeder; Birgit Wild; Marianne Koranda; Valentina Danese; Nicolas Brüggemann; Michael Schmitt; Rolf Siegwolf; Andreas Richter
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 10.151

10.  Rate of belowground carbon allocation differs with successional habit of two afromontane trees.

Authors:  Olga Shibistova; Yonas Yohannes; Jens Boy; Andreas Richter; Birgit Wild; Margarethe Watzka; Georg Guggenberger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.