Literature DB >> 22700330

A choice mind-set increases the acceptance and maintenance of wealth inequality.

Krishna Savani1, Aneeta Rattan.   

Abstract

Wealth inequality has significant psychological, physiological, societal, and economic costs. In six experiments, we investigated how seemingly innocuous, culturally pervasive ideas can help maintain and further wealth inequality. Specifically, we tested whether the concept of choice, which is deeply valued in American society, leads Americans to act in ways that perpetuate wealth inequality. Thinking in terms of choice, we argue, activates the belief that life outcomes stem from personal agency, not societal factors, and thereby leads people to justify wealth inequality. The results showed that highlighting the concept of choice makes people less disturbed by facts about existing wealth inequality in the United States, more likely to underestimate the role of societal factors in individuals' successes, less likely to support the redistribution of educational resources, and less likely to support raising taxes on the rich-even if doing so would help resolve a budget deficit crisis. These findings indicate that the culturally valued concept of choice contributes to the maintenance of wealth inequality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22700330     DOI: 10.1177/0956797611434540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  10 in total

1.  The Happy Culture: A Theoretical, Meta-Analytic, and Empirical Review of the Relationship Between Culture and Wealth and Subjective Well-Being.

Authors:  Piers Steel; Vasyl Taras; Krista Uggerslev; Frank Bosco
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2017-08-03

2.  Exposure to rising inequality shapes Americans' opportunity beliefs and policy support.

Authors:  Leslie McCall; Derek Burk; Marie Laperrière; Jennifer A Richeson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  People are more tolerant of inequality when it is expressed in terms of individuals rather than groups at the top.

Authors:  Jesse Walker; Stephanie J Tepper; Thomas Gilovich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A deep learning model identifies emphasis on hard work as an important predictor of income inequality.

Authors:  Abhishek Sheetal; Srinwanti H Chaudhury; Krishna Savani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  The salience of choice fuels independence: Implications for self-perception, cognition, and behavior.

Authors:  Kevin Nanakdewa; Shilpa Madan; Krishna Savani; Hazel Rose Markus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The frequency of excess success for articles in Psychological Science.

Authors:  Gregory Francis
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-10

7.  Correlates of Acceptance of Wealth Inequality: A Moderated Mediation Model.

Authors:  Grand H-L Cheng; Darius K-S Chan; Dannii Y Yeung
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-04-25

8.  Manipulated taking the agent versus the recipient perspective seems not to affect the relationship between agency-communion and self-esteem: A small-scale meta-analysis.

Authors:  Olga Bialobrzeska; Michal Parzuchowski; Bogdan Wojciszke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  How perceptions of autonomy relate to beliefs about inequality and fairness.

Authors:  Abraham Aldama; Cristina Bicchieri; Jana Freundt; Barbara Mellers; Ellen Peters
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Are There Advantages to Believing in Fate? The Belief in Negotiating With Fate When Faced With Constraints.

Authors:  Evelyn W M Au; Krishna Savani
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-11-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.