Literature DB >> 22700247

[Quality indicators of diagnosis and therapy in MRI-based neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for rectal cancer - interim analysis of a Prospective Multicentre Observational Study (OCUM)].

R Ruppert1, H Ptok2, J Strassburg3, C A Maurer4, T Junginger5, S Merkel6, P Hermanek6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The interim analysis of a prospective multicentre observational study of selective neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (OCUM) in patients with rectal cancer should evaluate the quality of diagnosis and therapy as a prerequisite for continuation of the study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 230 patients with the clinical stage cT2 - 4, each cN, M0 with radical tumour resection were enrolled until now. The values of 13 quality indicators were compared with the target values formulated by the workflow of the Working Group rectal cancer II and the German Cancer Society and were also compared with the results of the certified bowel centres of Germany 2010.
RESULTS: The target values were fulfilled to a high degree regardless of caseload. 83 % of parameters have been fully achieved and 14 % nearly achieved. In primary surgery the proportion of patients with 12 or more histologically examined lymph nodes was 99.2 %, after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy 90 %. A R0 resection was performed in 98.3 % and a resection of TME in muscularis propria plane only in 2.2 %. The rate of positive circumferential resection margins (pCRM + ) was 5.7 % only.
CONCLUSIONS: The high quality of rectal surgery justifies the concept and the continuation of the study. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22700247     DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1283922

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zentralbl Chir        ISSN: 0044-409X            Impact factor:   0.942


  7 in total

1.  Comment on the editorial of Sautter-Bihl et al. in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 2013 189:105-110.

Authors:  T Junginger; C A Maurer; R Ruppert; H Ptok; J Strassburg
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  [Imaging in rheumatology].

Authors:  T Witte
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.372

3.  Association of certification, improved quality and better oncological outcomes for rectal cancer in a specialized colorectal unit.

Authors:  Annika Jacob; Wolfgang Albert; Thomas Jackisch; Christiane Jakob; Anja Sims; Helmut Witzigmann; Sören Torge Mees; Sigmar Stelzner
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  [Individualization of guidelines. Approach for rectal cancer in UICC stages II and III].

Authors:  N Eismann; A Emmermann; C Zornig
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  [Role of neoadjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer : Is MRI-based selection a future model?].

Authors:  Y Kulu; T Hackert; J Debus; M-A Weber; M W Büchler; A Ulrich
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Adenocarcinomas of the upper third of the rectum and the rectosigmoid junction seem to have similar prognosis as colon cancers even without radiotherapy, SAKK 40/87.

Authors:  S A Käser; J Froelicher; Q Li; S Müller; U Metzger; M Castiglione; U T Laffer; C A Maurer
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  [Spincter preservation after selective chemoradiotherapy of rectal cancer. Interim results of the OCUM study].

Authors:  J Baral; M R Schön; R Ruppert; H Ptok; J Strassburg; P Brosi; M E Kreis; A Lewin; J Sauer; S Sawicki; L Schiffmann; G Winde; T Junginger; S Merkel; P Hermanek
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 0.955

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.