Literature DB >> 22699976

Two-wavelength fundus autofluorescence and macular pigment optical density imaging in diabetic macular oedema.

S M Waldstein1, D Hickey, I Mahmud, C A Kiire, P Charbel Issa, N V Chong.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the application of 488 and 514 nm fundus autofluorescence (FAF) and macular pigment optical density (MPOD) imaging in diabetic macular oedema (DMO) and to demonstrate the typical imaging features. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A hundred and twenty-five eyes of 71 consecutive patients with diabetic retinopathy who underwent examination at a specialist university clinic employing a modified Heidelberg Retina Angiograph, using two different light sources of 488 and 514 nm wavelength, were retrospectively reviewed. MPOD images were calculated using modified Heidelberg Eye Explorer software. All images were evaluated by two independent masked graders. Features from FAF and MPOD images were correlated with optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging findings and inter-grader variability, sensitivity and specificity were calculated using OCT as reference.
RESULTS: Sixty-seven eyes had DMO on OCT. The inter-grader variability was 0.84 for 488 nm FAF, 0.63 for 514 nm FAF and 0.79 for MPOD imaging. Sensitivity and specificity for detection of DMO were 80.6 and 89.7% for 488 nm FAF; 55.2 and 94.8% for 514 nm FAF; and 80.6 and 91.4% for MPOD imaging. In 488 nm FAF and MPOD imaging, DMO was better visualised in comparison with 514 nm FAF imaging, P<0.01. MPOD revealed displacement of macular pigment by intraretinal cysts.
CONCLUSION: MPOD imaging, and particularly its combination with 488 nm and 514 nm FAF, provides a valuable addition to OCT in the evaluation of DMO and is clinically useful in rapid en-face assessment of the central macula.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22699976      PMCID: PMC3420036          DOI: 10.1038/eye.2012.100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  30 in total

1.  The correlation between fluorescein angiographic and optical coherence tomographic features in clinically significant diabetic macular edema.

Authors:  Se Woong Kang; Choul Yong Park; Don-Il Ham
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 2.  The macular xanthophylls.

Authors:  Shazia S Ahmed; McGregor N Lott; Dennis M Marcus
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.048

3.  Macular pigment optical density measurement in autofluorescence imaging: comparison of one- and two-wavelength methods.

Authors:  M Trieschmann; B Heimes; H W Hense; D Pauleikhoff
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  [Topography of fundus autofluorescence with a new confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope].

Authors:  C Bellmann; F G Holz; O Schapp; H E Völcker; T P Otto
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Distribution of fundus autofluorescence with a scanning laser ophthalmoscope.

Authors:  A von Rückmann; F W Fitzke; A C Bird
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Patterns of diabetic macular edema with optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  T Otani; S Kishi; Y Maruyama
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Color matching in diabetes: optical density of the crystalline lens and macular pigments.

Authors:  Nigel Philip Davies; Antony Bryan Morland
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  The 14-year incidence of visual loss in a diabetic population.

Authors:  S E Moss; R Klein; B E Klein
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Comparison of the clinical diagnosis of diabetic macular edema with diagnosis by optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  David J Browning; Michael D McOwen; Robert M Bowen; Tisha L O'Marah
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  A new instrument for the quantification of macular pigment density: first results in patients with AMD and healthy subjects.

Authors:  Henrike Wüstemeyer; Cornelia Jahn; Andrei Nestler; Thomas Barth; Sebastian Wolf
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-07-24       Impact factor: 3.117

View more
  9 in total

1.  Macular pigment optical density spatial distribution measured in a subject with oculocutaneous albinism.

Authors:  Christopher M Putnam; Pauline J Bland
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2014-04-18

2.  Clinical relevance of quantified fundus autofluorescence in diabetic macular oedema.

Authors:  S Yoshitake; T Murakami; A Uji; N Unoki; Y Dodo; T Horii; N Yoshimura
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Fundus autofluorescence findings in central serous chorioretinopathy using two different confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopes: correlation with functional and structural status.

Authors:  Joo Youn Shin; Hun Jin Choi; Jonghyun Lee; Moonjung Choi; Byunghoon Chung; Suk Ho Byeon
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 4.  Fundus autofluorescence imaging: systematic review of test accuracy for the diagnosis and monitoring of retinal conditions.

Authors:  G K Frampton; N Kalita; L Payne; J L Colquitt; E Loveman; S M Downes; A J Lotery
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Comparison of fundus autofluorescence images acquired by the confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope (488 nm excitation) and the modified Topcon fundus camera (580 nm excitation).

Authors:  A Deli; L Moetteli; A Ambresin; I Mantel
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 6.  Spotlight on fundus autofluorescence.

Authors:  Ana M Calvo-Maroto; Alejandro Cerviño
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2018-03-27

7.  Nd:YAG Laser Vitreolysis for Symptomatic Vitreous Floaters: Application of Infrared Fundus Photography in Assessing the Treatment Efficacy.

Authors:  Xiaolei Sun; Jingyi Tian; Jinyan Wang; Jingjing Zhang; Ying Wang; Gongqiang Yuan
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01-27       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 8.  Current status and future possibilities of retinal imaging in diabetic retinopathy care applicable to low- and medium-income countries.

Authors:  Yamini Attiku; Ye He; Muneeswar Gupta Nittala; SriniVas R Sadda
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 1.848

9.  Autofluorescence Images with Carl Zeiss versus Topcon Eye Fundus Camera: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Juan M Muñoz; Rosa M Coco; M Rosa Sanabria; Ruben Cuadrado; Eduardo Blanco
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 1.909

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.