Literature DB >> 22698982

Exceptionally low prevalence of refractive error and visual impairment in schoolchildren from Lao People's Democratic Republic.

Robert J Casson1, Shyalle Kahawita, Aimee Kong, James Muecke, Siphetthavong Sisaleumsak, Vithoune Visonnavong.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Vientiane Province is an urbanizing region in Southeast Asia. We aimed to determine the prevalence of refractive error and visual impairment in primary school-aged children in this region.
DESIGN: Prospective, cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2899 schoolchildren from Vientiane Province, Lao People's Democratic Republic (Lao PDR).
METHODS: Ten districts from Vientiane were randomly selected and 2 primary schools were randomly selected from each district. All children aged 6 to 11 years at selected schools were eligible to participate. The examination included visual acuity (VA) testing, cycloplegic retinoscopy with subjective refinement if indicated, ocular motility testing, and anterior segment and fundus examinations in visually impaired children. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cycloplegic refraction and VA.
RESULTS: There was an estimated total of 3330 children who were eligible to participate, and data were recorded from 2899 (87%) of these children. Complete refractive data were available on 2842 children (85% of eligible population). The mean spherical equivalent (SE) in the right eyes was +0.60 diopter (D) (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49-0.72), and the mean SE in the left eyes was +0.59 (95% CI, 0.50-0.68). The prevalence of hyperopia was 2.8% (95% CI, 1.9-3.7; 88 subjects), and the prevalence of myopia was 0.8% (95% CI, 0.3-1.4; 24 subjects). The majority of children (98%; 95% CI, 97.0-99.0) had normal unaided binocular VA (at least 20/32 in their better eye). The overall prevalence of any visual impairment (presenting VA <20/32 in the better eye) was 1.9% (95% CI, 1.0-2.9; 55 subjects). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, age (P = 0.001) was a significant predictor, and female gender (P = 0.08) and Yao ethnicity (P = 0.09) were borderline significant predictors of the presence of any visual impairment.
CONCLUSIONS: Visual impairment is not a public health concern in this primary school-aged population; however, visually impaired children in the community were not studied. From this baseline, future surveys could determine the effect of increasing urbanization on myopia prevalence in this population.
Copyright © 2012 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22698982     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.03.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  17 in total

Review 1.  Hyperopia: a meta-analysis of prevalence and a review of associated factors among school-aged children.

Authors:  Victor Delpizzo Castagno; Anaclaudia Gastal Fassa; Maria Laura Vidal Carret; Manuel Augusto Pereira Vilela; Rodrigo Dalke Meucci
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 2.209

2.  The prevalence of refractive errors in 6- to 15-year-old schoolchildren in Dezful, Iran.

Authors:  Reza Norouzirad; Hassan Hashemi; Abbasali Yekta; Fereidon Nirouzad; Hadi Ostadimoghaddam; Negareh Yazdani; Nooshin Dadbin; Ali Javaherforoushzadeh; Mehdi Khabazkhoob
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-11-06

3.  Five-Year Progression of Refractive Errors and Incidence of Myopia in School-Aged Children in Western China.

Authors:  Wen-Jun Zhou; Yong-Ye Zhang; Hua Li; Yu-Fei Wu; Ji Xu; Sha Lv; Ge Li; Shi-Chun Liu; Sheng-Fang Song
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 3.211

Review 4.  Global and regional estimates of prevalence of refractive errors: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hassan Hashemi; Akbar Fotouhi; Abbasali Yekta; Reza Pakzad; Hadi Ostadimoghaddam; Mehdi Khabazkhoob
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-27

5.  Education and myopia: assessing the direction of causality by mendelian randomisation.

Authors:  Edward Mountjoy; Neil M Davies; Denis Plotnikov; George Davey Smith; Santiago Rodriguez; Cathy E Williams; Jeremy A Guggenheim; Denize Atan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-06-06

6.  Focusing in on the complex genetics of myopia.

Authors:  Robert Wojciechowski; Pirro G Hysi
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 5.917

7.  Refractive error, visual acuity and causes of vision loss in children in Shandong, China. The Shandong Children Eye Study.

Authors:  Jian Feng Wu; Hong Sheng Bi; Shu Mei Wang; Yuan Yuan Hu; Hui Wu; Wei Sun; Tai Liang Lu; Xing Rong Wang; Jost B Jonas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Prevalence of vision impairment and refractive error in school children in Ba Ria - Vung Tau province, Vietnam.

Authors:  Prakash Paudel; Prasidh Ramson; Thomas Naduvilath; David Wilson; Ha Thanh Phuong; Suit M Ho; Nguyen V Giap
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 4.207

9.  Low prevalence of myopia among school children in rural China.

Authors:  Chen-Wei Pan; Rong-Kun Wu; Jun Li; Hua Zhong
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 2.209

10.  Prevalence and time trends of refractive error in Chinese children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yi Tang; Aiming Chen; Minjie Zou; Zhenzhen Liu; Charlotte Aimee Young; Danying Zheng; Guangming Jin
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 4.413

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.