Literature DB >> 22698976

European and American perspectives on the meaning of natural.

Paul Rozin1, Claude Fischler, Christy Shields-Argelès.   

Abstract

Attitudes to natural foods and genetically modified organisms, assessed by multiple choice items, definitions of natural, and free associations to the word "natural" were determined for a representative sample of adults from France, Germany, Italy, Switzerland, the U.K., and the U.S.A. Individuals in all countries had a very positive attitude to natural. There is a surprising degree of similarity in conceptions of natural across the six countries, with a focus of food (and beverages) as central to the idea of natural, and links to the ideas of biological, healthy, plants, and the environment. Demographic differences (e.g., sex, education) were also small. Analysis of definitions and free associations suggests, and other data confirm, that across all countries, natural is defined principally by the absence of certain "negative" features (e.g., additives, pollution, human intervention), rather than the presence of certain positive features. Across all countries, plants, and in particular, plant foods, are more frequent exemplars of "natural" than are animals, with green the dominant color associated with natural. There is opposition to genetic engineering, which can be thought to be the opposite of natural, in all countries, but it is highest in continental Europe and lowest in the U.S.A.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22698976     DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  16 in total

1.  Genetic attributions and perceptions of naturalness are shaped by evaluative valence.

Authors:  Matthew S Lebowitz; Kathryn Tabb; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  J Soc Psychol       Date:  2021-04-09

2.  Genuine and Natural: The Opinion of Teen Consumers.

Authors:  Stefania Balzan; Luca Fasolato; Barbara Cardazzo; Cristiana Penon; Enrico Novelli
Journal:  Ital J Food Saf       Date:  2017-02-09

3.  People Believe and Behave as if Consumers of Natural Foods Are Especially Virtuous.

Authors:  Zoe Taylor; Richard J Stevenson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-09-27

4.  Synthetic livestock vaccines as risky interference with nature? Lay and expert arguments and understandings of "naturalness".

Authors:  Kia Ditlevsen; Cecilie Glerup; Peter Sandøe; Jesper Lassen
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2020-02-19

5.  Harmony Between Humanity and Nature: Natural Vs. Synthetic Drug Preference in Chinese Atheists and Taoists.

Authors:  Yu Cao; Heng Li
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2021-06-19

6.  Consumer Perspectives on Processing Technologies for Organic Food.

Authors:  Ronja Hüppe; Katrin Zander
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-05-27

7.  Bioengineering microbial communities: Their potential to help, hinder and disgust.

Authors:  Diane Sivasubramaniam; Ashley E Franks
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.269

8.  Health- and Taste-Related Attitudes Associated with Dietary Patterns in a Representative Sample of Polish Girls and Young Women: A Cross-Sectional Study (GEBaHealth Project).

Authors:  Joanna Kowalkowska; Marta Lonnie; Lidia Wadolowska; Jolanta Czarnocinska; Marzena Jezewska-Zychowicz; Ewa Babicz-Zielinska
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  What Is "Natural"? Consumer Responses to Selected Ingredients.

Authors:  Edgar Chambers; Edgar Chambers; Mauricio Castro
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2018-04-23

10.  Hot and bothered: Public attitudes towards heat stress and outdoor access for dairy cows.

Authors:  Clarissa S Cardoso; Marina A G von Keyserlingk; Maria José Hötzel; Jesse Robbins; Daniel M Weary
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.