Literature DB >> 22698776

Persistent annual permanent pacemaker implantation rate after surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Nicolas M Van Mieghem1, Stuart J Head, Wesley de Jong, Ron T van Domburg, Patrick W Serruys, Peter P de Jaegere, Luc Jordaens, Johanna J M Takkenberg, Ad J J C Bogers, Arie-Pieter Kappetein.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Degenerative aortic valve stenosis (AS) is associated with conduction abnormalities. Pacemaker implantation is encountered after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Not much is known about the pacemaker implantation rate during midterm follow-up after SAVR. Our objectives were to determine the incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) in the midterm after SAVR in a tertiary care facility.
METHODS: We reviewed procedural data of 734 consecutive patients (56% men; mean age, 68.9±9.5 years) with degenerative severe AS who underwent SAVR between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2008. Perioperative electrocardiograms were assessed for occurrence of conduction abnormalities, and we sought to determine the incidence and indication for PPI with a median follow-up of 3.76 years (interquartile range, 2.44 to 5.59 years). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were applied to identify predictors for early (≤30 days) and late (>30 days) PPI.
RESULTS: Isolated SAVR was performed in 56%, SAVR with coronary artery bypass grafting in 35%, and SAVR with any other valve therapy in 5.8%. Complete bundle branch block (BBB) was present in 7% and first-degree atrioventricular block in 11%. New BBBs were detected in 63 patients (8.6%). Fifteen patients (2.0%) required a PPI within 30 days after SAVR, and 28 (4.0%) underwent PPI more than 30 days after SAVR. The linearized rate of PPI after SAVR was 1.01%±0.37% per patient-year. Patients with BBB at baseline had a higher PPI incidence after SAVR than patients without BBB, both within 30 days (8% vs 1.5%, p=0.001) and after 30 days (10% vs 2.9%, p=0.006). PPI incidence after 30 days was also significantly higher in patients with a new BBB after SAVR (7.8% vs 2.9%, p=0.038). By multivariate logistic regression analysis, BBB and the combination of AS and regurgitation predicted PPI within 30 days after SAVR (hazard ratio [HR], 470; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.55 to 14.27; and HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.03 to 1.73, respectively). BBB (HR, 3.26; 95% CI, 1.41 to 7.54), previous cardiac operation (HR, 3.40; 95% CI, 1.16 to 9.94), and severe left ventricular dysfunction (HR, 9.82; 95% CI, 2.90 to 33.26) were predictors for PPI after 30 days post-SAVR.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe AS who underwent SAVR have a persistent 1% annual risk for PPI. Postoperative presence of BBB predicted the need for PPI both within 30 days and after 30 days after SAVR.
Copyright © 2012 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22698776     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.04.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  15 in total

1.  eComment. Persistent annual risk for pacemaker implantation after aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Jamil Hajj-Chahine
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-04

Review 2.  Clinical significance of conduction disturbances after aortic valve intervention: current evidence.

Authors:  Manuel Martinez-Selles; Peter Bramlage; Martin Thoenes; Gerhard Schymik
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 3.  New devices for TAVI: technologies and initial clinical experiences.

Authors:  Maurizio Taramasso; Alberto Pozzoli; Azeem Latib; Giovanni La Canna; Antonio Colombo; Francesco Maisano; Ottavio Alfieri
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  Need for Permanent Pacemaker After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Reduces Long-Term Survival.

Authors:  J Hunter Mehaffey; Nathan S Haywood; Robert B Hawkins; John A Kern; Nicholas R Teman; Irving L Kron; Leora T Yarboro; Gorav Ailawadi
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Sutureless valve and rapid deployment valves: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Campbell D Flynn; Michael L Williams; Adam Chakos; Lucy Hirst; Benjamin Muston; David H Tian
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-09

6.  Delayed Onset Atrioventricular Block After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Rare Entity.

Authors:  Rajwinder Gill; Vineet Meghrajani; Shaharyar Ali; Maria Riasat
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-06-02

Review 7.  Surgical treatment of aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Tirone E David
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 32.419

8.  Pacemaker dependency after isolated aortic valve replacement: do conductance disorders recover over time?

Authors:  Hassina Baraki; Ammar Al Ahmad; Stefan Jeng-Singh; Shunsuke Saito; Jan Dieter Schmitto; Bernhard Fleischer; Axel Haverich; Ingo Kutschka
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-01-08

9.  Need for permanent pacemaker implantation following implantation of the rapid deployment valve in combined procedures: a single centre cohort study.

Authors:  Oliver Deutsch; Isabell Deisenhofer; Katharina Koch-Buettner; Rüdiger Lange; Markus Krane
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Transcatheter Heart Valve Selection and Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Patients With Pre-Existent Right Bundle Branch Block.

Authors:  Lennart van Gils; Didier Tchetche; Thibault Lhermusier; Masieh Abawi; Nicolas Dumonteil; Ramón Rodriguez Olivares; Javier Molina-Martin de Nicolas; Pieter R Stella; Didier Carrié; Peter P De Jaegere; Nicolas M Van Mieghem
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.