Literature DB >> 22698049

How the pill became a lifestyle drug: the pharmaceutical industry and birth control in the United States since 1960.

Elizabeth Siegel Watkins1.   

Abstract

Marketing decisions, rather than scientific innovations, have guided the development and positioning of contraceptive products in recent years. I review the stalled progress in contraceptive development in the decades following the advent of the Pill in 1960 and then examine the fine-tuning of the market for oral contraceptives in the 1990s and 2000s. Although birth control has been pitched in the United States as an individual solution, rather than a public health strategy, the purpose of oral contraceptives was understood by manufacturers, physicians, and consumers to be the prevention of pregnancy, a basic health care need for women. Since 1990, the content of that message has changed, reflecting a shift in the drug industry's view of the contraception business. Two factors contributed to bring about this change: first, the industry's move away from research and development in birth control and second, the growth of the class of medications known as lifestyle drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22698049      PMCID: PMC3464843          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  12 in total

Review 1.  Lifestyle drugs: issues for debate.

Authors:  J Lexchin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Women's trials: the approval of the first oral contraceptive pill in the United States and Great Britain.

Authors:  Suzanne White Junod; Lara Marks
Journal:  J Hist Med Allied Sci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.088

3.  Lifestyle drug market booming.

Authors:  Tim Atkinson
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 53.440

4.  The use of the terms 'lifestyle medicines' or 'lifestyle drugs'.

Authors:  Claus Møldrup
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2004-08

Review 5.  The bitter pill.

Authors:  C Djerassi
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-07-28       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  United States loses lead in contraceptive choices, R&D; changes in tort liability, FDA review urged.

Authors:  T Randall
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-07-08       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  ACOG Committee Opinion No. 375: Brand versus generic oral contraceptives.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Bioequivalence: the regulatory career of a pharmaceutical concept.

Authors:  Daniel Carpenter; Dominique A Tobbell
Journal:  Bull Hist Med       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 9.  Still waiting for the contraceptive revolution.

Authors:  M Klitsch
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec

10.  Birth control after 1984.

Authors:  C Djerassi
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-09-04       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  9 in total

1.  A qualitative analysis of long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  Beth Sundstrom; Annalise Baker-Whitcomb; Andrea L DeMaria
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-07

2.  What happens when you stop using the combined contraceptive pill? A qualitative study protocol on consequences and supply needs for women who discontinued the combined contraceptive pill in Germany.

Authors:  Jana Niemann; Liane Schenk; Gertraud Stadler; Matthias Richter
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  Out-of-pocket spending for oral contraceptives among women with private insurance coverage after the Affordable Care Act.

Authors:  Brittni Frederiksen; Matthew Rae; Alina Salganicoff
Journal:  Contracept X       Date:  2020-07-31

4.  Childlessness among Muthuvan Tribes of Tamil Nadu, India: An Exploratory Study.

Authors:  S Mageswari; H Magesh Rajan; M Balusamy; G Elavarasu; R Vijayaprabha; V Ramachandran; J John Britto; Yuvaraj Jayaraman
Journal:  Indian J Community Med       Date:  2021-03-01

5.  Irregular menses predicts ovarian cancer: Prospective evidence from the Child Health and Development Studies.

Authors:  Piera M Cirillo; Erica T Wang; Marcelle I Cedars; Lee-May Chen; Barbara A Cohn
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 7.316

6.  "A magical little pill that will relieve you of your womanly issues": What young women say about menstrual suppression.

Authors:  Colleen McMillan; Amanda Jenkins
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2016-11-23

7.  Reported evidence on the effectiveness of mass media interventions in increasing knowledge and use of family planning in low and middle-income countries: a systematic mixed methods review.

Authors:  Jacqueline Safieh; Tibor Schuster; Britt McKinnon; Amy Booth; Yves Bergevin
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.413

8.  Medical borderlands: engineering the body with plastic surgery and hormonal therapies in Brazil.

Authors:  Alexander Edmonds; Emilia Sanabria
Journal:  Anthropol Med       Date:  2014

9.  The myth of menstruation: how menstrual regulation and suppression impact contraceptive choice.

Authors:  Andrea L DeMaria; Beth Sundstrom; Stephanie Meier; Abigail Wiseley
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 2.809

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.