OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to elucidate changes in attitudes, experiences, readiness, and confidence levels of medical residents to perform screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) and factors that moderate these changes. METHODS: A cohort of 121 medical residents received an educational intervention. Self-reported experience, readiness, attitude, and confidence toward SBIRT-related skills were measured at baseline and at follow-up. Analyses were conducted to evaluate the effects of medical specialization. RESULTS: The intervention significantly increased experience (P<.001), attitude (P<.05), readiness (P<.001), and confidence (P<.001). Residents were more likely to report that their involvement influenced patients' substance use. However, experience applying SBIRT skills varied by country of birth, specialty, and baseline scores. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that SBIRT training was an effective educational tool that increased residents' sense of responsibility. However, application of skills might differ by specialization and other variables. Future studies are needed to explore and evaluate SBIRT knowledge obtained, within the context of cultural awareness and clinical skills.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to elucidate changes in attitudes, experiences, readiness, and confidence levels of medical residents to perform screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) and factors that moderate these changes. METHODS: A cohort of 121 medical residents received an educational intervention. Self-reported experience, readiness, attitude, and confidence toward SBIRT-related skills were measured at baseline and at follow-up. Analyses were conducted to evaluate the effects of medical specialization. RESULTS: The intervention significantly increased experience (P<.001), attitude (P<.05), readiness (P<.001), and confidence (P<.001). Residents were more likely to report that their involvement influenced patients' substance use. However, experience applying SBIRT skills varied by country of birth, specialty, and baseline scores. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that SBIRT training was an effective educational tool that increased residents' sense of responsibility. However, application of skills might differ by specialization and other variables. Future studies are needed to explore and evaluate SBIRT knowledge obtained, within the context of cultural awareness and clinical skills.
Authors: Richard Saitz; Peter D Friedmann; Lisa M Sullivan; Michael R Winter; Christine Lloyd-Travaglini; Mark A Moskowitz; Jeffrey H Samet Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Gail D'Onofrio; Eric S Nadel; Linda C Degutis; Lisa M Sullivan; Karen Casper; Edward Bernstein; Jeffrey H Samet Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Michael F Fleming; Marlon P Mundt; Michael T French; Linda Baier Manwell; Ellyn A Stauffacher; Kristen Lawton Barry Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Derek D Satre; Jennifer K Manuel; Sandra Larios; Scott Steiger; Jason Satterfield Journal: J Addict Med Date: 2015 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.702
Authors: Vanessa J Marshall; Nnenna Kalu; John Kwagyan; Denise M Scott; Gloria E Cain; Karen Hill; Victor Hesselbrock; Clifford L Ferguson; Robert E Taylor Journal: J Natl Med Assoc Date: 2013 Impact factor: 1.798