Literature DB >> 2269803

Intravenous regional sympatholysis: a double-blind comparison of guanethidine, reserpine, and normal saline.

J Blanchard, S Ramamurthy, N Walsh, J Hoffman, L Schoenfeld.   

Abstract

This double-blind, randomized study was designed to compare the effectiveness of intravenous regional sympatholysis using guanethidine, reserpine and normal saline. Twenty-one patients with reflex sympathetic dystrophy of an upper or lower extremity were enrolled and received intravenous regional blockade (IVRB) with one of the three medications. There was significant pain relief in all three groups at 30 min. There were no significant differences among the three groups in the degree of pain relief, the number of patients obtaining pain relief in the 30 min after the block, or the number of patients reporting more than 50% pain relief for more than 24 hr. The saline group's high rate of pain relief could be partially due to a mechanism of tourniquet-induced analgesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2269803     DOI: 10.1016/0885-3924(90)90030-n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  14 in total

Review 1.  Complex regional pain syndromes.

Authors:  R Baron; G Wasner
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2001-04

2.  [The symptom sympathetic maintained pain].

Authors:  J Schattschneider; G Wasner; A Binder; D Siebrecht; R Baron
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.107

3.  [100 years Sudek syndrome].

Authors:  K H Wilhelm; M A Scherer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  [Not Available].

Authors:  C Maier
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 5.  Management strategies for chronic pain.

Authors:  D M Justins
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  The sympathetic nervous system contributes to capsaicin-evoked mechanical allodynia but not pinprick hyperalgesia in humans.

Authors:  M Liu; M B Max; S Parada; J S Rowan; G J Bennett
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-11-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Treatment of complex regional pain syndrome type I of the hand with a series of intravenous regional sympathetic blocks with guanethidine and lidocaine.

Authors:  Kosmas I Paraskevas; Alexandra A Michaloglou; Despina D Briana; Maria Samara
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  What constitutes a clinically important pain reduction in patients after third molar surgery?

Authors:  Wilhelmus J J M Martin; C E Ashton-James; N E Skorpil; M W Heymans; T Forouzanfar
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 3.037

Review 9.  A hypothesis for the cause of complex regional pain syndrome-type I (reflex sympathetic dystrophy): pain due to deep-tissue microvascular pathology.

Authors:  Terence J Coderre; Gary J Bennett
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.750

10.  [Complex regional pain syndrome I and II. What effects the outcome?].

Authors:  M Gehling; M Tryba; H Niebergall; A Hufschmidt; M Schild; K Geiger
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.107

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.