Literature DB >> 22697486

Maxillary sinus augmentation with iliac autograft - a health-economic analysis.

A Truedsson1, K Hjalte, B Sunzel, G Warfvinge.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To estimate and compare the costs of maxillary sinus augmentation performed with autologous bone graft either from the iliac crest or from local bone harvested from the mandibula. To evaluate post-operative health-related quality-of-life parameters for patients subjected to sinus augmentation and iliac bone surgery.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The hospital records of 14 patients subjected to sinus augmentation with iliac autograft, and 14 patients treated with local autograft, were analysed with regard to costs related to surgery, hospitalization and sick leave. Post-operative health parameters were assessed with a questionnaire.
RESULTS: Mean hospital costs, administration excluded, for sinus augmentation with iliac autograft was €3447. Policlinic treatment alternatives e.g. local bone autograft with or without bone substitutes, rendered costs of approximately 42% thereof. The loss of production for a worker was 41% of the total cost (€9285). With regard to health-related quality-of-life and post-operative morbidity, most of the patients had recovered 14 days after the iliac graft surgery.
CONCLUSION: The cost for a sinus augmentation with iliac surgery exceeds that of a policlinic procedure manifold. Provided that a policlinic operation with local bone, with or without bone substitute, renders an adequate end result, the economic gain would be substantial and post-operative morbidity would be greatly reduced.
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22697486     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02515.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  5 in total

1.  Out-of-Pocket Costs and Provider Payments in Cleft Lip and Palate Repair.

Authors:  Danielle H Rochlin; Lucy W Ma; Clifford C Sheckter; H Peter Lorenz
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 1.763

2.  Treatment of Severely Resorbed Maxilla Due to Peri-Implantitis by Guided Bone Regeneration Using a Customized Allogenic Bone Block: A Case Report.

Authors:  Oliver Blume; Lisa Hoffmann; Phil Donkiewicz; Sabine Wenisch; Michael Back; Jörg Franke; Reinhard Schnettler; Mike Barbeck
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-10-21       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  Patient experience following iliac crest-derived alveolar bone grafting and implant placement.

Authors:  Cecilie G Gjerde; Siddharth Shanbhag; Evelyn Neppelberg; Kamal Mustafa; Harald Gjengedal
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2020-02-05

4.  Does new bone formation vary in different sites within the same maxillary sinus after lateral augmentation? A prospective histomorphometric study.

Authors:  Claudio Stacchi; Antonio Rapani; Teresa Lombardi; Fabio Bernardello; Vanessa Nicolin; Federico Berton
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 5.021

5.  Allogenic vs. synthetic granules for bone tissue engineering: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Farnaz Kouhestani; Farnaz Dehabadi; Mehrnoosh Hasan Shahriari; Saeed Reza Motamedian
Journal:  Prog Biomater       Date:  2018-07-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.