BACKGROUND: Assessment of surgical skill plays a crucial role in determining competency, monitoring educational programs, and providing trainee feedback. With the changing health care environment, it will likely play an important role in credentialing and maintenance of certification. The ideal skill assessment tool should be unbiased, objective, and accurate. We hypothesize that tool-motion data-how a surgeon moves his/her instruments-and eye-gaze data-what a surgeon looks at when he/she operates-contain sufficient information to quantitatively and objectively evaluate surgical skill. We investigate this hypothesis by developing a statistical model of surgery and testing the model experimentally in the context of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). METHODS: A total of 378 trials were recorded from 7 expert and 13 novice surgeons while they were performing a series of 9 different ESS tasks. Data was collected using an electromagnetic tracker to record the surgeon's tool and endoscope motions. In addition, the location of surgeon's eye gaze was recorded using an infrared eye tracker camera. This data was fit to the statistical model and used to test the accuracy of skill assessment. RESULTS: The skill of expert surgeons was identified correctly for 94.6% of tasks. For surgeries performed by novice surgeons the proposed model properly recognizes the skill level with 88.6% accuracy. CONCLUSION: We present an objective and unbiased method for assessing the skill of endoscopic sinus surgeons. Experimental results show that the proposed method successfully identifies the skill levels of both expert and novice surgeons.
BACKGROUND: Assessment of surgical skill plays a crucial role in determining competency, monitoring educational programs, and providing trainee feedback. With the changing health care environment, it will likely play an important role in credentialing and maintenance of certification. The ideal skill assessment tool should be unbiased, objective, and accurate. We hypothesize that tool-motion data-how a surgeon moves his/her instruments-and eye-gaze data-what a surgeon looks at when he/she operates-contain sufficient information to quantitatively and objectively evaluate surgical skill. We investigate this hypothesis by developing a statistical model of surgery and testing the model experimentally in the context of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). METHODS: A total of 378 trials were recorded from 7 expert and 13 novice surgeons while they were performing a series of 9 different ESS tasks. Data was collected using an electromagnetic tracker to record the surgeon's tool and endoscope motions. In addition, the location of surgeon's eye gaze was recorded using an infrared eye tracker camera. This data was fit to the statistical model and used to test the accuracy of skill assessment. RESULTS: The skill of expert surgeons was identified correctly for 94.6% of tasks. For surgeries performed by novice surgeons the proposed model properly recognizes the skill level with 88.6% accuracy. CONCLUSION: We present an objective and unbiased method for assessing the skill of endoscopic sinus surgeons. Experimental results show that the proposed method successfully identifies the skill levels of both expert and novice surgeons.
Authors: R Alex Harbison; Angelique M Berens; Yangming Li; Randall A Bly; Blake Hannaford; Kris S Moe Journal: J Neurol Surg B Skull Base Date: 2016-08-30
Authors: R Alex Harbison; Yangming Li; Angelique M Berens; Randall A Bly; Blake Hannaford; Kris S Moe Journal: J Neurol Surg B Skull Base Date: 2016-12-20
Authors: Angelique M Berens; Richard Alex Harbison; Yangming Li; Randall A Bly; Nava Aghdasi; Manuel Ferreira; Blake Hannaford; Kris S Moe Journal: Surg Innov Date: 2017-04-15 Impact factor: 2.058
Authors: Kyle Lam; Junhong Chen; Zeyu Wang; Fahad M Iqbal; Ara Darzi; Benny Lo; Sanjay Purkayastha; James M Kinross Journal: NPJ Digit Med Date: 2022-03-03
Authors: Weiling Hu; Bin Wang; Leimin Sun; Shujie Chen; Liangjing Wang; Kan Wang; Jiaguo Wu; John J Kim; Jiquan Liu; Ning Dai; Huilong Duan; Jianmin Si Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-04-14 Impact factor: 3.411