OBJECTIVE: Transfers to adult care can be problematic, resulting in postponement due to the protective nature of pediatric care and patient dependency. It is unknown whether these findings apply specifically to urology patients. Our department is taking part in a national general transition project. In this light, our aim was to investigate the specific needs of adolescent urologic patients, regarding their independence and transition. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 80 patients, born in 1975-1998, with a chronic bladder condition received a questionnaire. They were divided into pre- and post-transfer groups. Parents (n = 7) of post-transfer patients formed a third group. Questionnaires were based on those used in the national transition study, supplemented with urological questions. Pre-transfer patients were asked about their level of independence, what subjects were discussed during consultations, and their expectations and wishes regarding transfer. Post-transfer patients and parents were asked for their opinions on the transfer process. RESULTS: 73% (n = 58) responded (55 pre-transfer and 3 post-transfer patients plus parents). It appeared that the confidence built-up with the pediatric urologist impeded the transfer. An adequate level of disease-related knowledge was reported. Relationships, sexuality and fertility were hardly talked about (respectively n = 17, 16 and 18). Parents played an important role, which patients appreciated, confirming their dependency. Despite the 49% (n = 27) who stated they can arrange their urological care themselves, 44% (n = 24) felt ill-prepared for transfer. CONCLUSION: Although overall self-perceived knowledge is sufficient, the trust in and personal relationship with the pediatric urologist formed the greatest obstruction to successful transition. These findings have been used to improve support during transition by creating a transition protocol.
OBJECTIVE: Transfers to adult care can be problematic, resulting in postponement due to the protective nature of pediatric care and patient dependency. It is unknown whether these findings apply specifically to urology patients. Our department is taking part in a national general transition project. In this light, our aim was to investigate the specific needs of adolescent urologic patients, regarding their independence and transition. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 80 patients, born in 1975-1998, with a chronic bladder condition received a questionnaire. They were divided into pre- and post-transfer groups. Parents (n = 7) of post-transfer patients formed a third group. Questionnaires were based on those used in the national transition study, supplemented with urological questions. Pre-transfer patients were asked about their level of independence, what subjects were discussed during consultations, and their expectations and wishes regarding transfer. Post-transfer patients and parents were asked for their opinions on the transfer process. RESULTS: 73% (n = 58) responded (55 pre-transfer and 3 post-transfer patients plus parents). It appeared that the confidence built-up with the pediatric urologist impeded the transfer. An adequate level of disease-related knowledge was reported. Relationships, sexuality and fertility were hardly talked about (respectively n = 17, 16 and 18). Parents played an important role, which patients appreciated, confirming their dependency. Despite the 49% (n = 27) who stated they can arrange their urological care themselves, 44% (n = 24) felt ill-prepared for transfer. CONCLUSION: Although overall self-perceived knowledge is sufficient, the trust in and personal relationship with the pediatric urologist formed the greatest obstruction to successful transition. These findings have been used to improve support during transition by creating a transition protocol.