Literature DB >> 22695049

Sutureless aortic valve replacement: first-year single-center experience.

Giuseppe Santarpino1, Steffen Pfeiffer, Joachim Schmidt, Giovanni Concistrè, Theodor Fischlein.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sutureless aortic bioprostheses bear the potential of easy implantation, reduced ischemic time, and surgical trauma in aortic valve replacement. We herein show our clinical and echocardiographic results after a 1-year experience with a new sutureless bioprosthesis.
METHODS: The Perceval S (Sorin Biomedica Cardio Srl, Saluggia, Italy) is a pericardial aortic prosthesis assembled within a super-elastic alloy frame. It is implanted intra-annularly, without the need of suture. As part of a premarketing multicenter study (Cavalier Trial), since March 2010, 83 patients were screened for implantation in our center.
RESULTS: The patients received a size S (4), M (38), or L (41) prosthesis, either as isolated (57) or combined procedures (26). Fifty-one patients (61.5%) received a "J" sternotomy. Mean logistic European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation was 10.±7.5%, mean aortic cross-clamp time was 43.8±20.8 minutes (36±12.7 minutes for isolated procedures). Mean implantation time was 8±3.8 minutes (range 4 to 28 minutes). In-hospital mortality was 2.4% (1 patient for multiorgan failure and 1 for liver insufficiency); mean hospital stay was 11.5±4.4 days (range 2 to 28 days). We recorded 5 pacemaker implantations (6%). At follow-up, we had 2 deaths (1 patient for congestive heart failure and 1 for gastrointestinal bleeding). At 1 year, mean New York Heart Association functional class was 1.0±0.6. Mean transprosthetic gradients were 13.4±2.8, 12.6±2.3, and 10.8±1.3 mm Hg postoperatively, at 6 months, and at 1 year, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The Perceval S shows satisfactory clinical and hemodynamic results. Due to its simple implantation technique, it represents an alternative especially for minimally invasive surgery. Operative trauma can be minimized by short aortic cross-clamp time.
Copyright © 2012 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22695049     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.04.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  10 in total

1.  Left ventricular mass regression after sutureless implantation of the Perceval S aortic valve bioprosthesis: preliminary results.

Authors:  Giuseppe Santarpino; Steffen Pfeiffer; Francesco Pollari; Giovanni Concistrè; Ferdinand Vogt; Theodor Fischlein
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-10-08

2.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) versus sutureless aortic valve replacement (SUAVR) for aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of matched studies.

Authors:  Nelson Wang; Yi-Chin Tsai; Natasha Niles; Vakhtang Tchantchaleishvili; Marco Di Eusanio; Tristan D Yan; Kevin Phan
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Bilal H Kirmani; Sion G Jones; S C Malaisrie; Darryl A Chung; Richard Jnn Williams
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-10

4.  Recent improvement in operative techniques lead to lower pacemaker rate after Perceval implant.

Authors:  Olivier Fabre; Mihai Radutoiu; Ionut Carjaliu; Olivier Rebet; Laurence Gautier; Ilir Hysi
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-07-09

5.  Sutureless versus Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement: Outcomes in 70 High-Risk Patients Undergoing Concomitant Cardiac Procedures.

Authors:  Muhammet Onur Hanedan; Mehmet Ali Yuruk; Ali Ihsan Parlar; Ugur Ziyrek; Ali Kemal Arslan; Ufuk Sayar; Ilker Mataraci
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2018-02-01

Review 6.  [Aortic valve replacement in the elderly].

Authors:  F Vogt; S Wicklein; K Singler; S Pfeiffer; T Fischlein; J Schwab; M Pauschinger; J Jessl
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 1.281

7.  Minimally Invasive Versus Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement: A Propensity-Matched Study From the UK National Data.

Authors:  Rizwan Q Attia; Graeme L Hickey; Stuart W Grant; Ben Bridgewater; James C Roxburgh; Pankaj Kumar; Paul Ridley; Moninder Bhabra; Russell W J Millner; Thanos Athanasiou; Roberto Casula; Andrew Chukwuemka; Thasee Pillay; Christopher P Young
Journal:  Innovations (Phila)       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

8.  Early Outcomes of Sutureless Aortic Valves.

Authors:  Muhammet Onur Hanedan; İlker Mataracı; Mehmet Ali Yürük; Tanıl Özer; Ufuk Sayar; Ali Kemal Arslan; Uğur Ziyrek; Murat Yücel
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-06-05

9.  Early Clinical Results of Perceval Sutureless Aortic Valve in 139 Patients: Freeman Experience.

Authors:  Syed Saleem Mujtaba; Simon Ledingham; Asif Raza Shah; Stephen Clark; Thasee Pillay; Stephan Schueler
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb

10.  Aortic Valve Replacement with a Conventional Stented Bioprosthesis versus Sutureless Bioprosthesis: a Study of 763 Patients.

Authors:  Syed Saleem Mujtaba; Simon M Ledingham; Asif Raza Shah; Thasee Pillay; Stephan Schueler; Stephen Clark
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.