Literature DB >> 22694036

On the cutting edge: ethical responsiveness to cesarean rates.

Sylvia Burrow1.   

Abstract

Cesarean delivery rates have been steadily increasing worldwide. In response, many countries have introduced target goals to reduce rates. But a focus on target goals fails to address practices embedded in standards of care that encourage, rather than discourage, cesarean sections. Obstetrical standards of care normalize use of technology, creating an imperative to use technology during labor and birth. A technological imperative is implicated in rising cesarean rates if physicians or patients fear refusing use of technology. Reproductive autonomy is at stake since a technological imperative undermines patients' ability to choose cesareans or refuse use of technology increasing the likelihood of cesareans. To address practices driven by a technological imperative I outline three physician obligations that are attached to respecting patient autonomy. These moral obligations show that a focus on respect for autonomy may prove not only an ideal ethical response but also an achievable practical response to lowering cesarean rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22694036     DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2012.673689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bioeth        ISSN: 1526-5161            Impact factor:   11.229


  6 in total

1.  Not Sick: Liberal, Trans, and Crip Feminist Critiques of Medicalization.

Authors:  Cristina S Richie
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2019-06-29       Impact factor: 1.352

2.  Informed Consent in Asymmetrical Relationships: an Investigation into Relational Factors that Influence Room for Reflection.

Authors:  Shannon Lydia Spruit; Ibo van de Poel; Neelke Doorn
Journal:  Nanoethics       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 0.917

3.  Why the Elective Caesarean Lottery is Ethically Impermissible.

Authors:  Elizabeth Chloe Romanis
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2019-12

4.  How to reach trustworthy decisions for caesarean sections on maternal request: a call for beneficial power.

Authors:  Kristiane T Eide; Kristine Bærøe
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 5.926

5.  The autonomous choice of delivery mode: A survey of Tunisian women.

Authors:  Kaouther Dimassi; Meriem Melki; Amal Chebbi; Rim Rafrafi
Journal:  Tunis Med       Date:  2021 Aout

6.  Reviewing the womb.

Authors:  Elizabeth Chloe Romanis; Dunja Begović; Margot R Brazier; Alexandra Katherine Mullock
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.903

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.