Literature DB >> 22692739

Novel method for evaluating in vitro activity of anidulafungin in combination with amphotericin B or azoles.

R Teixeira-Santos1, R Rocha, A Moreira-Rosário, M Monteiro-Soares, E Cantón, A G Rodrigues, C Pina-Vaz.   

Abstract

A combination of drugs possessing different targets has been used as salvage therapy, although without scientific support. In vitro studies validating such combinations are scarce, and the methodology is very laborious and time-consuming. This study proposes a flow cytometric (FC) protocol as an alternative to evaluate the effect of the combination of anidulafungin (AND) with amphotericin B (AMB) and azoles (fluconazole and voriconazole), tested upon 39 and 36 Candida strains, respectively. The concentration assayed in the combination was 0.5× MIC of each drug. The membrane potential marker DiBAC(4)(3) [Bis-(1,3-dibutylbarbituric acid) trimethine oxonol] was used for AND-AMB, and the metabolic marker FUN-1 was used for AND-azoles. Drug interaction was determined by calculating a staining index (SI): the sum of the percentage of depolarized cells (DC) after treatment with drug combinations divided by the DC of the drug alone, and the sum of the mean intensity of fluorescence (MIF) displayed by cells treated with drug combinations divided by the MIF of the drug alone for FUN-1. An SI of <1 means antagonism, an SI between 1 and 4 means no interaction, and an SI of >4 means synergism. The combination of AND and AMB by FC and checkerboard was synergistic for 46 and 43% of isolates and antagonistic for 5 and 8%, respectively. For the combination of AND and azoles, it was synergistic for 36% and antagonistic for 3% by FC and synergistic for 44% and antagonistic for 3% by checkerboard. When the FC method was compared to the gold standard checkerboard method, the agreement was 0.91 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] of 0.88 to 0.94), sensitivity was 0.88 (95% CI of 0.73 to 0.95), and specificity was 0.95 (95% CI of 0.84 to 1). Thus, FC is a rapid and reliable method (<2 h) to assess the effect of antifungal combinations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22692739      PMCID: PMC3421532          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00610-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  34 in total

1.  Rapid flow cytometric susceptibility testing of Candida albicans.

Authors:  R Ramani; A Ramani; S J Wong
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Synergy, antagonism, and what the chequerboard puts between them.

Authors:  F C Odds
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Collaborative study of the NCCLS and flow cytometry methods for antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida albicans.

Authors:  Vishnu Chaturvedi; Rama Ramani; Michael A Pfaller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Combinations of antifungal agents in therapy--what value are they?

Authors:  Manuel Cuenca-Estrella
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2004-09-16       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 5.  Combination antifungal therapy.

Authors:  Melissa D Johnson; Conan MacDougall; Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner; John R Perfect; John H Rex
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Fixed-ratio combination testing of an echinocandin, anidulafungin, and an azole, voriconazole, against 1,467 Candida species isolates.

Authors:  Ronald N Jones; Mariana Castanheira; Michael A Pfaller
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Comparison of Etest, chequerboard dilution and time-kill studies for the detection of synergy or antagonism between antifungal agents tested against Candida species.

Authors:  R E Lewis; D J Diekema; S A Messer; M A Pfaller; M E Klepser
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  Comparison of three different in vitro methods of detecting synergy: time-kill, checkerboard, and E test.

Authors:  R L White; D S Burgess; M Manduru; J A Bosso
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Susceptibility to fluconazole of Candida clinical isolates determined by FUN-1 staining with flow cytometry and epifluorescence microscopy.

Authors:  Cidália Pina-Vaz; Filipe Sansonetty; Acácio G Rodrigues; Sofia Costa-DE-Oliveira; J Martinez-DE-Oliveira; António F Fonseca
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.472

10.  Antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida species by flow cytometry.

Authors:  W Lee; Y Kwak
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.153

View more
  3 in total

1.  New Insights Regarding Yeast Survival following Exposure to Liposomal Amphotericin B.

Authors:  Rita Teixeira-Santos; Elisabete Ricardo; Susana Gomes Guerreiro; Sofia Costa-de-Oliveira; Acácio Gonçalves Rodrigues; Cidália Pina-Vaz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  A Flow Cytometric and Computational Approaches to Carbapenems Affinity to the Different Types of Carbapenemases.

Authors:  Cidália Pina-Vaz; Ana P Silva; Isabel Faria-Ramos; Rita Teixeira-Santos; Daniel Moura; Tatiana F Vieira; Sérgio F Sousa; Sofia Costa-de-Oliveira; Rafael Cantón; Acácio G Rodrigues
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Unveiling the Synergistic Interaction Between Liposomal Amphotericin B and Colistin.

Authors:  Rita Teixeira-Santos; Elisabete Ricardo; Ricardo J Branco; Maria M Azevedo; Acácio G Rodrigues; Cidália Pina-Vaz
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 5.640

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.