Literature DB >> 22692549

Hygienic guidance values for wipe sampling of antineoplastic drugs in Swedish hospitals.

Maria Hedmer1, Gertrud Wohlfart.   

Abstract

The use of antineoplastic drugs in health care steadily increases. Health care workers can be occupationally exposed to antineoplastic drugs classified as carcinogenic or teratogenic. Monitoring of surface contamination is a common way to assess occupational exposure to antineoplastic drugs, since wipe sampling is used as a surrogate measure of dermal exposure. Since no occupational limits for antineoplastic drugs in work environments exist, 'hygienic guidance values' (HGVs) should be used instead. HGVs are practicable, achievable levels, not health based, and can be calculated from exposure data from representative workplaces with good occupational hygiene practices. So far, guidance values for surface monitoring of antineoplastic drugs only exist for pharmacies where antineoplastic drugs are prepared. The objective was to propose HGVs for surface monitoring of cyclophosphamide (CP) and ifosfamide (IF) in Swedish hospitals where antineoplastic drugs are administered to patients. In total, 17 workplaces located at six hospitals in Sweden were surveyed by wipe sampling. Wipe samples were collected, worked up and then analyzed with liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Surface contamination of CP and IF was found on 80% and 73% of the sampled surfaces, thus indicating that there is potential for health care workers to be exposed to CP and IF via the skin. The median surface load of CP was 3.3 pg cm(-2) (range <0.05-10,800 pg cm(-2)). The corresponding value for IF was 4.2 pg cm(-2) (range <0.13-95,000 pg cm(-2)). The highest surface loads were found on the floors. The proposed HGVs were set at 90th percentile values, and can be applicable to hospital workplaces where patients are treated with CP or IF. Surface monitoring combined with HGVs is a useful tool for health care workers to regularly benchmark their own surface loads which could control and reduce the occupational exposure to CP and IF in hospital workplaces. Thus, the occupational safety of the health care workers will be increased.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22692549     DOI: 10.1039/c2em10704j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Monit        ISSN: 1464-0325


  9 in total

1.  Micronuclei and chromosome aberrations in subjects occupationally exposed to antineoplastic drugs: a multicentric approach.

Authors:  Massimo Moretti; Maria Giuseppa Grollino; Sofia Pavanello; Roberta Bonfiglioli; Milena Villarini; Massimo Appolloni; Mariella Carrieri; Laura Sabatini; Luca Dominici; Laura Stronati; Giuseppe Mastrangelo; Anna Barbieri; Cristina Fatigoni; Giovanni Battista Bartolucci; Elisabetta Ceretti; Francesca Mussi; Silvano Monarca
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 2.  Environmental monitoring by surface sampling for cytotoxics: a review.

Authors:  Petit Marie; Curti Christophe; Roche Manon; Montana Marc; Bornet Charleric; Vanelle Patrice
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 3.  Identification of Knowledge Gaps Regarding Healthcare Workers' Exposure to Antineoplastic Drugs: Review of Literature, North America versus Europe.

Authors:  Chun-Yip Hon; Cris Barzan; George Astrakianakis
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2014-06-11

4.  Cost Analysis of Using a Closed-System Transfer Device (CSTD) for Antineoplastic Drug preparation in a Malaysian Government-Funded Hospital

Authors:  Huan Keat Chan; Yik Ming Lim
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2016-11-01

5.  A simple approach to assess the cancer risk of occupational exposure to genotoxic drugs in healthcare settings.

Authors:  Johannes Gerding; Lea Anhäuser; Udo Eickmann; Albert Nienhaus
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.646

6.  Occupational Exposure Assessment to Antineoplastic Drugs in Nine Italian Hospital Centers over a 5-Year Survey Program.

Authors:  Cristina Sottani; Elena Grignani; Marco Cornacchia; Sara Negri; Francesco Saverio Robustelli Della Cuna; Danilo Cottica; Dario Bruzzese; Paolo Severi; Daniele Strocchi; Giovanni Verna; Veruscka Leso; Ivo Iavicoli
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  Reporting environmental contamination results to healthcare workers could play a crucial role in decreasing the risk of occupational exposure to antineoplastic drugs.

Authors:  Alexandre Acramel; Sandy Blondeel-Gomes; Carla Matta; Subramanian Narayani; Olivier Madar; Romain Desmaris; Laurence Escalup; Julien Fouque
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-08-25

8.  Environmental Contamination and Occupational Exposure of Algerian Hospital Workers.

Authors:  Eline Verscheure; Matteo Creta; Jeroen Vanoirbeek; Meziane Zakia; Taleb Abdesselam; Robin Lebegge; Katrien Poels; Radu-Corneliu Duca; Lode Godderis
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-08-05

9.  Evaluation of external contamination on the vial surfaces of some hazardous drugs that commonly used in Chinese hospitals and comparison between environmental contamination generated during robotic compounding by IV: Dispensing robot vs. manual compounding in biological safety cabinet.

Authors:  Hao Ml; Wang T; Zhu Jq; Song Yj; Gong Tj; Zou Lk; Liu J; Yan Jf
Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 1.416

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.