Literature DB >> 2269223

The effect of measurement error on the dose-response curve.

I Yoshimura1.   

Abstract

In epidemiological studies for an environmental risk assessment, doses are often observed with errors. However, they have received little attention in data analysis. This paper studies the effect of measurement errors on the observed dose-response curve. Under the assumptions of the monotone likelihood ratio on errors and a monotone increasing dose-response curve, it is verified that the slope of the observed dose-response curve is likely to be gentler than the true one. The observed variance of responses are not so homogeneous as to be expected under models without errors. The estimation of parameters in a hockey-stick type dose-response curve with a threshold is considered on line of the maximum likelihood method for a functional relationship model. Numerical examples adaptable to the data in a 1986 study of the effect of air pollution that was conducted in Japan are also presented. The proposed model is proved to be suitable to the data in the example cited in this paper.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2269223      PMCID: PMC1567852          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.9087173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  5 in total

Review 1.  Green tea and the risk of prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuming Guo; Fan Zhi; Ping Chen; Keke Zhao; Han Xiang; Qi Mao; Xinghuan Wang; Xinhua Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 2.  What Are the Net Benefits of Reducing the Ozone Standard to 65 ppb? An Alternative Analysis.

Authors:  Sabine S Lange; Sean E Mulholland; Michael E Honeycutt
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Fasting Blood Glucose and COVID-19 Severity: Nonlinearity Matters.

Authors:  Barrak Alahmad; Abdullah A Al-Shammari; Abdullah Bennakhi; Fahd Al-Mulla; Hamad Ali
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  A simulation-based assessment of the ability to detect thresholds in chronic risk concentration-response functions in the presence of exposure measurement error.

Authors:  Garrett Glasgow; Bharat Ramkrishnan; Anne E Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Lycopene and Risk of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ping Chen; Wenhao Zhang; Xiao Wang; Keke Zhao; Devendra Singh Negi; Li Zhuo; Mao Qi; Xinghuan Wang; Xinhua Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.