Literature DB >> 22692171

Effect of empirical treatment with moxifloxacin and meropenem vs meropenem on sepsis-related organ dysfunction in patients with severe sepsis: a randomized trial.

Frank M Brunkhorst1, Michael Oppert, Gernot Marx, Frank Bloos, Katrin Ludewig, Christian Putensen, Axel Nierhaus, Ulrich Jaschinski, Andreas Meier-Hellmann, Andreas Weyland, Matthias Gründling, Onnen Moerer, Reimer Riessen, Armin Seibel, Maximilian Ragaller, Markus W Büchler, Stefan John, Friedhelm Bach, Claudia Spies, Lorenz Reill, Harald Fritz, Michael Kiehntopf, Evelyn Kuhnt, Holger Bogatsch, Christoph Engel, Markus Loeffler, Marin H Kollef, Konrad Reinhart, Tobias Welte.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Early appropriate antimicrobial therapy leads to lower mortality rates associated with severe sepsis. The role of empirical combination therapy comprising at least 2 antibiotics of different mechanisms remains controversial.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of moxifloxacin and meropenem with the effect of meropenem alone on sepsis-related organ dysfunction. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: A randomized, open-label, parallel-group trial of 600 patients who fulfilled criteria for severe sepsis or septic shock (n = 298 for monotherapy and n = 302 for combination therapy). The trial was performed at 44 intensive care units in Germany from October 16, 2007, to March 23, 2010. The number of evaluable patients was 273 in the monotherapy group and 278 in the combination therapy group.
INTERVENTIONS: Intravenous meropenem (1 g every 8 hours) and moxifloxacin (400 mg every 24 hours) or meropenem alone. The intervention was recommended for 7 days and up to a maximum of 14 days after randomization or until discharge from the intensive care unit or death, whichever occurred first. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Degree of organ failure (mean of daily total Sequential Organ Failure Assessment [SOFA] scores over 14 days; score range: 0-24 points with higher scores indicating worse organ failure); secondary outcome: 28-day and 90-day all-cause mortality. Survivors were followed up for 90 days.
RESULTS: Among 551 evaluable patients, there was no statistically significant difference in mean SOFA score between the meropenem and moxifloxacin group (8.3 points; 95% CI, 7.8-8.8 points) and the meropenem alone group (7.9 points; 95% CI, 7.5-8.4 points) (P = .36). The rates for 28-day and 90-day mortality also were not statistically significantly different. By day 28, there were 66 deaths (23.9%; 95% CI, 19.0%-29.4%) in the combination therapy group compared with 59 deaths (21.9%; 95% CI, 17.1%-27.4%) in the monotherapy group (P = .58). By day 90, there were 96 deaths (35.3%; 95% CI, 29.6%-41.3%) in the combination therapy group compared with 84 deaths (32.1%; 95% CI, 26.5%-38.1%) in the monotherapy group (P = .43).
CONCLUSION: Among adult patients with severe sepsis, treatment with combined meropenem and moxifloxacin compared with meropenem alone did not result in less organ failure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00534287.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22692171     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2012.5833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  73 in total

1.  Sepsis: No benefit of combination therapy for sepsis-related organ dysfunction.

Authors:  Susan J Allison
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 2.  Urosepsis--Etiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment.

Authors:  Nici Markus Dreger; Stephan Degener; Parviz Ahmad-Nejad; Gabriele Wöbker; Stephan Roth
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 3.  [Tarragona strategy--appropriate antibiotic therapy in the ICU].

Authors:  L Engelmann; D V Schmitt
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2014-03-22       Impact factor: 0.840

4.  Prediction of multiple infections after severe burn trauma: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Shuangchun Yan; Amy Tsurumi; Yok-Ai Que; Colleen M Ryan; Arunava Bandyopadhaya; Alexander A Morgan; Patrick J Flaherty; Ronald G Tompkins; Laurence G Rahme
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  [Severe pneumonia in the intensive care unit].

Authors:  T Welte
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 6.  [Patients with sepsis].

Authors:  M Oppert
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 0.840

7.  Common genomic variation in the FER gene: useful to stratify patients with sepsis due to pneumonia?

Authors:  F Schöneweck; E Kuhnt; M Scholz; F M Brunkhorst; A Scherag
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 8.  [First-line anti-infective treatment in sepsis].

Authors:  H Burgmann
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 0.840

9.  The Japanese guidelines for the management of sepsis.

Authors:  Shigeto Oda; Mayuki Aibiki; Toshiaki Ikeda; Hitoshi Imaizumi; Shigeatsu Endo; Ryoichi Ochiai; Joji Kotani; Nobuaki Shime; Osamu Nishida; Takayuki Noguchi; Naoyuki Matsuda; Hiroyuki Hirasawa
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2014-10-28

Review 10.  Control groups in recent septic shock trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ville Pettilä; Peter Buhl Hjortrup; Stephan M Jakob; Erika Wilkman; Anders Perner; Jukka Takala
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-07-23       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.