Literature DB >> 22692116

The effects of different intensities and durations of the general warm-up on leg press 1RM.

Renato Barroso1, Carla Silva-Batista, Valmor Tricoli, Hamilton Roschel, Carlos Ugrinowitsch.   

Abstract

The precision of maximum strength assessments (1 repetition maximum; 1RM) is important to evaluate the functional capacity and to prescribe and monitor the training load. Several factors can affect the precision of 1RM tests, including the warm-up procedure. General and specific warm-up routines are recommended to enhance performance. The effects of a specific warm-up have already been acknowledged in improving performance. However, the effects of a general warm-up (GWU) are unclear but seem to depend on its ability to increase muscle temperature while avoiding fatigue. Furthermore, temperature elevation is dependent on both the duration and the intensity of the activity, which may eventually affect 1RM performance. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of different intensities and durations of GWU on 1RM performance. Sixteen strength-trained men were tested for 1RM leg press after 4 GWU conditions after specific warm-up: short duration and low intensity (SDLI; i.e., 5 minutes at 40% V[Combining Dot Above]O2max), long duration and low intensity (LDLI; i.e., 15 minutes at 40% V[Combining Dot Above]O2max), short duration and moderate intensity (SDMI; i.e., 5 minutes at 70% V[Combining Dot Above]O2max), long duration and moderate intensity (LDMI; i.e., 15 minutes at 70% V[Combining Dot Above]O2max), and the control (CTRL) no-GWU condition. Leg press 1RM values were higher (on average 3%) when subjects performed LDLI (367.8 ± 70.1 kg; p = 0.01), compared with the other 4 conditions. After the LDMI condition, 1RM values were lower (on average -4%) than in the other 4 conditions (345.6 ± 70.5 kg; p = 0.01). There were no differences between SDMI, SDLI, and CTRL (359.4 ± 69.2 kg, 359.1 ± 69.3 kg, and 359.4 ± 70.4 kg, respectively; p = 0.99). According to our results, long-duration low-intensity general warm-up seems be appropriately to improve 1RM performance in strength-trained individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22692116     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182606cd9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  5 in total

Review 1.  A brief review of strength and ballistic assessment methodologies in sport.

Authors:  Daniel Travis McMaster; Nicholas Gill; John Cronin; Michael McGuigan
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Effects of general, specific and combined warm-up on explosive muscular performance.

Authors:  D C Andrade; C Henriquez-Olguín; A R Beltrán; M A Ramírez; C Labarca; M Cornejo; C Álvarez; R Ramírez-Campillo
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 2.806

3.  Can Different Complex Training Improve the Individual Phenomenon of Post-Activation Potentiation?

Authors:  Zong-Rong Chen; Shin-Liang Lo; Min-Hsien Wang; Ching-Fang Yu; Hsien-Te Peng
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2017-03-12       Impact factor: 2.193

4.  Maximum Isometric and Dynamic Strength of Mixed Martial Arts Athletes According to Weight Class and Competitive Level.

Authors:  Orlando Folhes; Víctor Machado Reis; Diogo Luís Marques; Henrique Pereira Neiva; Mário Cardoso Marques
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  The Role of Specific Warm-up during Bench Press and Squat Exercises: A Novel Approach.

Authors:  Bruno Ribeiro; Ana Pereira; Pedro P Neves; António C Sousa; Ricardo Ferraz; Mário C Marques; Daniel A Marinho; Henrique P Neiva
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.