Literature DB >> 22692106

Mechanical load and physiological responses of four different resistance training methods in bench press exercise.

Sebastian Buitrago1, Nicolas Wirtz, Zengyuan Yue, Heinz Kleinöder, Joachim Mester.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to compare the mechanical impact and the corresponding physiological responses of 4 different and often practically applied resistance training methods (RTMs). Ten healthy male subjects (27.3 ± 3.2 years) experienced in resistance training performed 1 exhausting set of bench press exercise until exhaustion for each of the following RTMs: strength endurance (SE), fast force endurance (FFE), hypertrophy (HYP), and maximum strength (MAX). The RTMs were defined by different lifting masses and different temporal distributions of the contraction modes per repetition. Mean concentric power (P), total concentric work (W), and exercise time (EXTIME) were determined. Oxygen uptake (V[Combining Dot Above]O2) was measured during exercise and for 30 minutes postexercise. Mean V[Combining Dot Above]O2, volume of consumed O2, and excess postexercise oxygen consumption (EPOC) were calculated over 30 minutes of recovery. Maximum blood lactate concentration (LAmax) was also determined postexercise. The P was significantly higher (p < 0.01) for FFE and MAX compared with that for SE and HYP. The W was significantly higher for FFE than for all other RTMs (p < 0.01), and it was also lower for SE than for MAX (p < 0.05). EXTIME for SE was significantly higher (p < 0.01) than for all other RTMs, whereas EXTIME for MAX was significantly lower (p < 0.01) than for all other RTMs. Mean V[Combining Dot Above]O2 was significantly higher during FFE than during all other RTMs (p < 0.01). Consumed O2 was significantly higher (p < 0.05) during SE than for HYP and MAX, and it was also significantly higher for FFE and HYP compared with MAX (p < 0.05). The LAmax was significantly higher after FFE than after MAX (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in EPOC between all RTMs. The results indicate that FFE and MAX are adequate to train muscular power despite the discrepancy in the external load. Because FFE performance achieves the highest amount in mechanical work, it may also elicit the highest total energy expenditure. The FFE challenges aerobic metabolism most and SE enables the longest EXTIME, indicating both are appropriate to enhance aerobic muscular capacities. The EPOC and LA values may indicate that energy needs covered by anaerobic metabolism are not higher during HYP and MAX compared with the RTM of lower external load.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22692106     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318260ec77

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  7 in total

1.  Training in the functional movement circle to promote strength and mobility-related activities in older adults: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Tobias Morat; Heinz Mechling
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2014-11-18

2.  Development and validity of a scale of perception of velocity in resistance exercise.

Authors:  Iker J Bautista; Ignacio J Chirosa; Luis J Chirosa; Ignacio Martín; Andrés González; Robert J Robertson
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Lactate Kinetics during Multiple Set Resistance Exercise.

Authors:  Nicolas Wirtz; Patrick Wahl; Heinz Kleinöder; Joachim Mester
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Energy cost of isolated resistance exercises across low- to high-intensities.

Authors:  Victor Machado Reis; Nuno Domingos Garrido; Jeferson Vianna; Ana Catarina Sousa; José Vilaça Alves; Mário Cardoso Marques
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  p38 MAPK activation and H3K4 trimethylation is decreased by lactate in vitro and high intensity resistance training in human skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Lena Willkomm; Sebastian Gehlert; Daniel Jacko; Thorsten Schiffer; Wilhelm Bloch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Are wearable heart rate measurements accurate to estimate aerobic energy cost during low-intensity resistance exercise?

Authors:  Victor M Reis; Jeferson M Vianna; Tiago M Barbosa; Nuno Garrido; Jose Vilaça Alves; André L Carneiro; Felipe J Aidar; Jefferson Novaes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Resistance Training Safety during and after the SARS-Cov-2 Outbreak: Practical Recommendations.

Authors:  Paulo Gentil; Claudio Andre Barbosa de Lira; Daniel Souza; Alfonso Jimenez; Xian Mayo; Anna Luiza de Fátima Pinho Lins Gryschek; Erica Gomes Pereira; Pedro Alcaraz; Antonino Bianco; Antonio Paoli; Julio Papeschi; Luiz Carlos Carnevali Junior
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.