B Bonevski1, J Bryant, M Lynagh, C Paul. 1. Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia. Billie.Bonevski@newcastle.edu.au
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to a) assess acceptability of personal financial incentives to socially disadvantaged smokers and non-smokers; b) examine factors associated with acceptability; and c) examine preferred levels of incentive amounts. METHODS: A cross-sectional touch screen computer survey was conducted between February and October 2010 in New South Wales, Australia. Participants were clients experiencing financial or social hardship and receiving emergency welfare aid from a non-government social and community service organisation. RESULTS: Of 383 participants (69% response rate), 46% believed personal financial incentives were an excellent/good idea, 47% believed personal financial incentives did more good than harm and 61% agreed they would motivate smokers to quit. High acceptability ratings were associated with participants being female, current smokers, living in low socioeconomic areas, experiencing smoking-induced deprivation, making a previous quit attempt and intending to quit in the next 6 months. When asked what amount of incentive they felt would be acceptable, 23% selected amounts between $50 and $500 AUD and 37% selected amounts over $500 AUD. CONCLUSIONS: Given high smoking prevalence among socially disadvantaged groups and consequent health disparities, it is imperative novel methods of encouraging smoking cessation are explored and tested. This survey found financial incentives may be an acceptable method. Further research to understand all possible positive and negative effects is warranted.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to a) assess acceptability of personal financial incentives to socially disadvantaged smokers and non-smokers; b) examine factors associated with acceptability; and c) examine preferred levels of incentive amounts. METHODS: A cross-sectional touch screen computer survey was conducted between February and October 2010 in New South Wales, Australia. Participants were clients experiencing financial or social hardship and receiving emergency welfare aid from a non-government social and community service organisation. RESULTS: Of 383 participants (69% response rate), 46% believed personal financial incentives were an excellent/good idea, 47% believed personal financial incentives did more good than harm and 61% agreed they would motivate smokers to quit. High acceptability ratings were associated with participants being female, current smokers, living in low socioeconomic areas, experiencing smoking-induced deprivation, making a previous quit attempt and intending to quit in the next 6 months. When asked what amount of incentive they felt would be acceptable, 23% selected amounts between $50 and $500 AUD and 37% selected amounts over $500 AUD. CONCLUSIONS: Given high smoking prevalence among socially disadvantaged groups and consequent health disparities, it is imperative novel methods of encouraging smoking cessation are explored and tested. This survey found financial incentives may be an acceptable method. Further research to understand all possible positive and negative effects is warranted.
Authors: Darla E Kendzor; Michael S Businelle; Insiya B Poonawalla; Erica L Cuate; Anshula Kesh; Debra M Rios; Ping Ma; David S Balis Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-11-13 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Emma L Giles; Matthew Holmes; Elaine McColl; Falko F Sniehotta; Jean M Adams Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2015-05-16 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Motoyuki Yuasa; Yoshihisa Shirayama; Keiichi Osato; Cesar Miranda; Julia Condore; Roxana Siles Journal: BMC Int Health Hum Rights Date: 2015-06-20
Authors: Darla E Kendzor; Michael S Businelle; Joseph J C Waring; Ashley J Mathews; Daryl W Geller; Jocelyn M Barton; Adam C Alexander; Emily T Hébert; Chaelin K Ra; Damon J Vidrine Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2020-04-15 Impact factor: 4.773