Literature DB >> 22691919

Adding thoracic fusion levels in Lenke 5 curves: risks and benefits.

Robert K Lark1, Burt Yaszay, Tracey P Bastrom, Peter O Newton.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Multicenter; review of prospectively collected data.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the risks and potential benefits of nonselective versus selective fusion in a matched set of patients with Lenke 5 curves. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The Lenke classification suggests a limited thoracolumbar/lumbar fusion for type 5 curves, although many experienced adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgeons, at times, include a fusion of the thoracic curve. METHODS.: Prospectively collected cases from a multicenter database were analyzed. Patients with Lenke type 5 scoliosis curves were divided into 2 groups: 109 selective or short (only thoracolumbar/lumbar curve fused), and 41 nonselective or long (both thoracolumbar/lumbar and thoracic curves fused). Patients were then matched on the basis of the preoperative radiographical and clinical measures. Two-year postoperative radiographical and clinical outcomes were compared, using analysis of variance, with Bonferroni correction (P < 0.008).
RESULTS: Twenty-nine matched pairs (58 patients) with Lenke 5 curves were identified. There were no preoperative differences between groups in age, thoracic or lumbar Cobb angle, curve flexibility, thoracic kyphosis, clinical trunk flexibility, or Scoliosis Research Society outcomes questionnaire scores. Postoperatively, patients in the nonselective group exhibited greater coronal correction for thoracic (residual Cobb; 22° vs. 12°) and lumbar curves (residual Cobb; 19° vs. 13°). However, the longer fusions had significantly less thoracic kyphosis (27° vs. 18°), truncal side bending (14 vs. 10 cm), and rotational flexibility (53° vs. 42°). There was no difference in clinical balance or Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire, version 22, scores.
CONCLUSION: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgeons attempt to achieve balanced correction with the fewest motion segments fused. Our data suggest that fusion of the thoracic curve in primary thoracolumbar scoliosis may improve coronal correction, but at the cost of decreased thoracic kyphosis and clinical flexibility 2 years postoperatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22691919     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182634c85

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  8 in total

1.  Criteria for successful correction of thoracolumbar/lumbar curves in AIS patients: results of risk model calculations using target outcomes and failure analysis.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Oliver Meier; Wolfgang Hitzl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Characterizing the differences between the 2D and 3D measurements of spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Saba Pasha; Patrick J Cahill; John P Dormans; John M Flynn
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Lowest instrumented vertebrae selection for selective posterior fusion of moderate thoracolumbar/lumbar idiopathic scoliosis: lower-end vertebra or lower-end vertebra+1?

Authors:  Zhijian Sun; Guixing Qiu; Yu Zhao; Yipeng Wang; Jianguo Zhang; Jianxiong Shen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Lowest Instrumented Vertebrae Selection for Posterior Fusion of Lenke 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Can We Stop the Fusion One Level Proximal to Lower-end Vertebra?

Authors:  Ismail Emre Ketenci; Hakan Serhat Yanik; Ayhan Ulusoy; Serdar Demiroz; Sevki Erdem
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.251

5.  Postoperative proximal junctional kyphosis correlated with thoracic inlet angle in Lenke 5c adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients following posterior surgery.

Authors:  Bowen Hu; Linnan Wang; Yueming Song; Xi Yang; Limin Liu; Chunguang Zhou
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 2.562

6.  Surgical treatment of Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Comparison of anterior vs posterior approach.

Authors:  Mark F Abel; Anuj Singla; Mark A Feger; Lindsay D Sauer; Wendy Novicoff
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-09-18

7.  Higher Flexibility and Better Immediate Spontaneous Correction May Not Gain Better Results for Nonstructural Thoracic Curve in Lenke 5C AIS Patients: Risk Factors for Its Correction Loss.

Authors:  Yanbin Zhang; Guanfeng Lin; Shengru Wang; Jianguo Zhang; Jianxiong Shen; Yipeng Wang; Jianwei Guo; Xinyu Yang; Lijuan Zhao
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.241

8.  Radiographic evaluation of posterior selective thoracolumbar or lumbar fusion for moderate Lenke 5C curves.

Authors:  Yanbin Zhang; Guanfeng Lin; Jianguo Zhang; Jianwei Guo; Shengru Wang; Yang Yang; Jianxiong Shen; Yipeng Wang
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.067

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.