BACKGROUND: With the transplantation of more extensive facial vascularized composite allografts, fundamental craniofacial and aesthetic principles become increasingly important. In addition, computer-assisted planning and intraoperative navigation may improve precision and efficiency in these complex procedures. METHODS: Ten mock face transplants were performed in 20 cadavers. The vascularized composite allograft consisted of all facial skin, mimetic muscles, the tongue, the midface by means of a Le Fort III osteotomy, and the mandible by means of sagittal split osteotomies. Craniofacial computed tomographic scans were obtained before and after the mock transplants. Surgical planning software was used to virtually plan the osteotomies, and a surgical navigation system guided the osteotomies intraoperatively. Cephalometric analyses were compared between the virtually planned transplants and the actual postoperative results. RESULTS: The combination of preoperative computerized planning and intraoperative guidance consistently produced a vascularized composite allograft that could be easily fixated to the prepared recipient, with only minimal burring of osteotomy sites necessary. Satisfactory occlusion was maintained, and postoperative computed tomography confirmed accurate skeletal fixation. Insignificant differences with regard to cephalometric analyses were noted when predicted and actual postoperative data were compared. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' experience treating severe craniofacial injury allowed consistent transfer of facial vascularized composite allografts, maintaining proper occlusion. Preoperative computer planning and intraoperative navigation ensured precise osteotomies and a good donor-recipient skeletal match, which greatly reduced the need for intraoperative adjustments and manipulation. This total facial vascularized composite allograft represents one of the most extensive described and is intended to represent a typical central facial demolition pattern.
BACKGROUND: With the transplantation of more extensive facial vascularized composite allografts, fundamental craniofacial and aesthetic principles become increasingly important. In addition, computer-assisted planning and intraoperative navigation may improve precision and efficiency in these complex procedures. METHODS: Ten mock face transplants were performed in 20 cadavers. The vascularized composite allograft consisted of all facial skin, mimetic muscles, the tongue, the midface by means of a Le Fort III osteotomy, and the mandible by means of sagittal split osteotomies. Craniofacial computed tomographic scans were obtained before and after the mock transplants. Surgical planning software was used to virtually plan the osteotomies, and a surgical navigation system guided the osteotomies intraoperatively. Cephalometric analyses were compared between the virtually planned transplants and the actual postoperative results. RESULTS: The combination of preoperative computerized planning and intraoperative guidance consistently produced a vascularized composite allograft that could be easily fixated to the prepared recipient, with only minimal burring of osteotomy sites necessary. Satisfactory occlusion was maintained, and postoperative computed tomography confirmed accurate skeletal fixation. Insignificant differences with regard to cephalometric analyses were noted when predicted and actual postoperative data were compared. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' experience treating severe craniofacial injury allowed consistent transfer of facial vascularized composite allografts, maintaining proper occlusion. Preoperative computer planning and intraoperative navigation ensured precise osteotomies and a good donor-recipient skeletal match, which greatly reduced the need for intraoperative adjustments and manipulation. This total facial vascularized composite allograft represents one of the most extensive described and is intended to represent a typical central facial demolition pattern.
Authors: Ethan L Nyberg; Ashley L Farris; Ben P Hung; Miguel Dias; Juan R Garcia; Amir H Dorafshar; Warren L Grayson Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2016-06-13 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: Michael Sosin; Gerhard S Mundinger; Amir H Dorafshar; Nicholas T Iliff; Joani M Christensen; Michael R Christy; Branko Bojovic; Eduardo D Rodriguez Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2016-02-26
Authors: Elie P Ramly; Rami S Kantar; J Rodrigo Diaz-Siso; Allyson R Alfonso; Eduardo D Rodriguez Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2019-08-19
Authors: Simone La Padula; Rosita Pensato; Chiara Pizza; Edoardo Coiante; Giovanni Roccaro; Benedetto Longo; Francesco D'Andrea; Francesco Saverio Wirz; Barbara Hersant; Jean Paul Meningaud Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-09-28 Impact factor: 4.964