Literature DB >> 22691200

Quantifying landscape linkages among giant panda subpopulations in regional scale conservation.

Dunwu Qi1, Yibo Hu, Xiaodong Gu, Xuyi Yang, Guang Yang, Fuwen Wei.   

Abstract

Understanding habitat requirements and identifying landscape linkages are essential for the survival of isolated populations of endangered species. Currently, some of the giant panda populations are isolated, which threatens their long-term survival, particularly in the Xiaoxiangling mountains. In the present study, we quantified niche requirements and then identified potential linkages of giant panda subpopulations in the most isolated region, using ecological niche factor analysis and a least-cost path model. Giant pandas preferred habitat with conifer forest and gentle slopes (>20 to ≤30°). Based on spatial distribution of suitable habitat, linkages were identified for the Yele subpopulation to 4 other subpopulations (Liziping, Matou, Xinmin and Wanba). Their lengths ranged from 15 to 54 km. The accumulated cost ranged from 693 to 3166 and conifer forest covered over 31%. However, a variety of features (e.g. major roads, human settlements and large unforested areas) might act as barriers along the linkages for giant panda dispersal. Our analysis quantified giant panda subpopulation connectivity to ensure long-term survival.
© 2012 ISZS, Blackwell Publishing and IOZ/CAS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22691200     DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-4877.2012.00281.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Zool        ISSN: 1749-4869            Impact factor:   2.654


  8 in total

1.  Withered on the stem: is bamboo a seasonally limiting resource for giant pandas?

Authors:  Youxu Li; Ronald R Swaisgood; Wei Wei; Yonggang Nie; Yibo Hu; Xuyu Yang; Xiaodong Gu; Zejun Zhang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Major histocompatibility complex alleles associated with parasite susceptibility in wild giant pandas.

Authors:  L Zhang; Q Wu; Y Hu; H Wu; F Wei
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Spatial models of giant pandas under current and future conditions reveal extinction risks.

Authors:  Lingqiao Kong; Weihua Xu; Yi Xiao; Stuart L Pimm; Hao Shi; Zhiyun Ouyang
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 15.460

4.  Evaluating landscape options for corridor restoration between giant panda reserves.

Authors:  Fang Wang; William J McShea; Dajun Wang; Sheng Li; Qing Zhao; Hao Wang; Zhi Lu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The minimum area requirements (MAR) for giant panda: an empirical study.

Authors:  Jing Qing; Zhisong Yang; Ke He; Zejun Zhang; Xiaodong Gu; Xuyu Yang; Wen Zhang; Biao Yang; Dunwu Qi; Qiang Dai
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Identifying wildlife corridors for the restoration of regional habitat connectivity: A multispecies approach and comparison of resistance surfaces.

Authors:  Canran Liu; Graeme Newell; Matt White; Andrew F Bennett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Identifying core habitats and corridors for giant pandas by combining multiscale random forest and connectivity analysis.

Authors:  Xue Sun; Zexu Long; Jingbo Jia
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Does high vegetation coverage equal high giant panda density?

Authors:  Cheng Li; Zi-Qiang Bao; Xin-Rui Luo; Wei Wu; Jiao-Jiao Yu; Rong Hou; Jacob R Owens; Qiang Xu; Xiao-Dong Gu; Hong Yang; Zuo-Fu Xiang; Dun-Wu Qi
Journal:  Zool Res       Date:  2022-07-18
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.