James Law1, Robert Rush, Chantelle Anandan, Marie Cox, Rachael Wood. 1. Institute of Health and Society, School of Education, Communication and Language Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 7RU United Kingdom. james.law@ncl.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Early language delays across the preschool period have important implications for children, parents, and services raising the significance of early identification. Screening tests are an appealing solution but have proved problematic. A combined risk model would seem promising but has yet to be tested. The goal of this study was to examine the factors that predict language change in a nationally representative sample of children between 3 and 5 years when most children are identified as being in need of services. METHODS: By using data from children (n = 13,016) in the Millennium Cohort Study (a national UK birth cohort), linear regression was used to predict 5-year performance from 3-year test performance data coupled with sociodemographic and within-child factors and indicators of parental concern. Patterns of change were identified and logistic regression was used to predict the difference between children for whom profiles change and those for whom they do not. RESULTS: The final model (predicting 32% of the variance) included maternal education, pattern construction, behavior, language concerns, and 3-year vocabulary. Four change patterns were identified: one consistently low (n = 201), one consistently high (n = 12,066), a group that is resilient (n = 572), and one with a declining profile (n = 177). The models accurately predicted 71% of the declining group and 99% of the resilient group. Maternal education (odds ratio: 0.49) and behavior (odds ratio: 0.9) were significant predictors for the former and maternal education (odds ratio: 0.6) and pattern construction (odds ratio: 1.03) the latter. CONCLUSIONS: Early identification of delayed language remains problematic but, once identified, there are key indicators that predict which children are likely to be more or less at risk across time. The implications are discussed in terms of policy and practice.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Early language delays across the preschool period have important implications for children, parents, and services raising the significance of early identification. Screening tests are an appealing solution but have proved problematic. A combined risk model would seem promising but has yet to be tested. The goal of this study was to examine the factors that predict language change in a nationally representative sample of children between 3 and 5 years when most children are identified as being in need of services. METHODS: By using data from children (n = 13,016) in the Millennium Cohort Study (a national UK birth cohort), linear regression was used to predict 5-year performance from 3-year test performance data coupled with sociodemographic and within-child factors and indicators of parental concern. Patterns of change were identified and logistic regression was used to predict the difference between children for whom profiles change and those for whom they do not. RESULTS: The final model (predicting 32% of the variance) included maternal education, pattern construction, behavior, language concerns, and 3-year vocabulary. Four change patterns were identified: one consistently low (n = 201), one consistently high (n = 12,066), a group that is resilient (n = 572), and one with a declining profile (n = 177). The models accurately predicted 71% of the declining group and 99% of the resilient group. Maternal education (odds ratio: 0.49) and behavior (odds ratio: 0.9) were significant predictors for the former and maternal education (odds ratio: 0.6) and pattern construction (odds ratio: 1.03) the latter. CONCLUSIONS: Early identification of delayed language remains problematic but, once identified, there are key indicators that predict which children are likely to be more or less at risk across time. The implications are discussed in terms of policy and practice.
Authors: Sheena Reilly; Bruce Tomblin; James Law; Cristina McKean; Fiona K Mensah; Angela Morgan; Sharon Goldfeld; Jan M Nicholson; Melissa Wake Journal: Int J Lang Commun Disord Date: 2014 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.020
Authors: Laura Lee McIntyre; William E Pelham; Matthew H Kim; Thomas J Dishion; Daniel S Shaw; Melvin N Wilson Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2016-11-28 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Hugo Peyre; Cedric Galera; Judith van der Waerden; Nicolas Hoertel; Jonathan Y Bernard; Maria Melchior; Franck Ramus Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2016-11-08 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Si-Wei Ma; Li Lu; Ting-Ting Zhang; Dan-Tong Zhao; Bin-Ting Yang; Yan-Yan Yang; Jian-Min Gao Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-04-26 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Hugo Peyre; Jonathan Y Bernard; Anne Forhan; Marie-Aline Charles; Maria De Agostini; Barbara Heude; Franck Ramus Journal: PeerJ Date: 2014-04-01 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: Sarah Ellen Barnett; Penny Levickis; Cristina McKean; Carolyn Letts; Helen Stringer Journal: J Child Health Care Date: 2021-02-25 Impact factor: 1.979