Literature DB >> 22689750

Statistical model-based testing to evaluate the recurrence of genomic aberrations.

Atushi Niida1, Seiya Imoto, Teppei Shimamura, Satoru Miyano.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: In cancer genomes, chromosomal regions harboring cancer genes are often subjected to genomic aberrations like copy number alteration and loss of heterozygosity. Given this, finding recurrent genomic aberrations is considered an apt approach for screening cancer genes. Although several permutation-based tests have been proposed for this purpose, none of them are designed to find recurrent aberrations from the genomic dataset without paired normal sample controls. Their application to unpaired genomic data may lead to false discoveries, because they retrieve pseudo-aberrations that exist in normal genomes as polymorphisms.
RESULTS: We develop a new parametric method named parametric aberration recurrence test (PART) to test for the recurrence of genomic aberrations. The introduction of Poisson-binomial statistics allow us to compute small P-values more efficiently and precisely than the previously proposed permutation-based approach. Moreover, we extended PART to cover unpaired data (PART-up) so that there is a statistical basis for analyzing unpaired genomic data. PART-up uses information from unpaired normal sample controls to remove pseudo-aberrations in unpaired genomic data. Using PART-up, we successfully predict recurrent genomic aberrations in cancer cell line samples whose paired normal sample controls are unavailable. This article thus proposes a powerful statistical framework for the identification of driver aberrations, which would be applicable to ever-increasing amounts of cancer genomic data seen in the era of next generation sequencing. AVAILABILITY: Our implementations of PART and PART-up are available from http://www.hgc.jp/~niiyan/PART/manual.html.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22689750      PMCID: PMC3371835          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  14 in total

1.  A faster circular binary segmentation algorithm for the analysis of array CGH data.

Authors:  E S Venkatraman; Adam B Olshen
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 2.  Detection of DNA copy number alterations in cancer by array comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Evi Michels; Katleen De Preter; Nadine Van Roy; Frank Speleman
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 8.822

3.  Finding recurrent copy number alterations preserving within-sample homogeneity.

Authors:  Sandro Morganella; Stefano Maria Pagnotta; Michele Ceccarelli
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Signatures of mutation and selection in the cancer genome.

Authors:  Graham R Bignell; Chris D Greenman; Helen Davies; Adam P Butler; Sarah Edkins; Jenny M Andrews; Gemma Buck; Lina Chen; David Beare; Calli Latimer; Sara Widaa; Jonathon Hinton; Ciara Fahey; Beiyuan Fu; Sajani Swamy; Gillian L Dalgliesh; Bin T Teh; Panos Deloukas; Fengtang Yang; Peter J Campbell; P Andrew Futreal; Michael R Stratton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Assessing the significance of chromosomal aberrations in cancer: methodology and application to glioma.

Authors:  Rameen Beroukhim; Gad Getz; Leia Nghiemphu; Jordi Barretina; Teli Hsueh; David Linhart; Igor Vivanco; Jeffrey C Lee; Julie H Huang; Sethu Alexander; Jinyan Du; Tweeny Kau; Roman K Thomas; Kinjal Shah; Horacio Soto; Sven Perner; John Prensner; Ralph M Debiasi; Francesca Demichelis; Charlie Hatton; Mark A Rubin; Levi A Garraway; Stan F Nelson; Linda Liau; Paul S Mischel; Tim F Cloughesy; Matthew Meyerson; Todd A Golub; Eric S Lander; Ingo K Mellinghoff; William R Sellers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-12-06       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Highly sensitive method for genomewide detection of allelic composition in nonpaired, primary tumor specimens by use of affymetrix single-nucleotide-polymorphism genotyping microarrays.

Authors:  Go Yamamoto; Yasuhito Nannya; Motohiro Kato; Masashi Sanada; Ross L Levine; Norihiko Kawamata; Akira Hangaishi; Mineo Kurokawa; Shigeru Chiba; D Gary Gilliland; H Phillip Koeffler; Seishi Ogawa
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Inferring loss-of-heterozygosity from unpaired tumors using high-density oligonucleotide SNP arrays.

Authors:  Rameen Beroukhim; Ming Lin; Yuhyun Park; Ke Hao; Xiaojun Zhao; Levi A Garraway; Edward A Fox; Ephraim P Hochberg; Ingo K Mellinghoff; Matthias D Hofer; Aurelien Descazeaud; Mark A Rubin; Matthew Meyerson; Wing Hung Wong; William R Sellers; Cheng Li
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  PICNIC: an algorithm to predict absolute allelic copy number variation with microarray cancer data.

Authors:  Chris D Greenman; Graham Bignell; Adam Butler; Sarah Edkins; Jon Hinton; Dave Beare; Sajani Swamy; Thomas Santarius; Lina Chen; Sara Widaa; P Andy Futreal; Michael R Stratton
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 5.899

9.  The landscape of somatic copy-number alteration across human cancers.

Authors:  Rameen Beroukhim; Craig H Mermel; Dale Porter; Guo Wei; Soumya Raychaudhuri; Jerry Donovan; Jordi Barretina; Jesse S Boehm; Jennifer Dobson; Mitsuyoshi Urashima; Kevin T Mc Henry; Reid M Pinchback; Azra H Ligon; Yoon-Jae Cho; Leila Haery; Heidi Greulich; Michael Reich; Wendy Winckler; Michael S Lawrence; Barbara A Weir; Kumiko E Tanaka; Derek Y Chiang; Adam J Bass; Alice Loo; Carter Hoffman; John Prensner; Ted Liefeld; Qing Gao; Derek Yecies; Sabina Signoretti; Elizabeth Maher; Frederic J Kaye; Hidefumi Sasaki; Joel E Tepper; Jonathan A Fletcher; Josep Tabernero; José Baselga; Ming-Sound Tsao; Francesca Demichelis; Mark A Rubin; Pasi A Janne; Mark J Daly; Carmelo Nucera; Ross L Levine; Benjamin L Ebert; Stacey Gabriel; Anil K Rustgi; Cristina R Antonescu; Marc Ladanyi; Anthony Letai; Levi A Garraway; Massimo Loda; David G Beer; Lawrence D True; Aikou Okamoto; Scott L Pomeroy; Samuel Singer; Todd R Golub; Eric S Lander; Gad Getz; William R Sellers; Matthew Meyerson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Assessing the significance of conserved genomic aberrations using high resolution genomic microarrays.

Authors:  Mitchell Guttman; Carolyn Mies; Katarzyna Dudycz-Sulicz; Sharon J Diskin; Don A Baldwin; Christian J Stoeckert; Gregory R Grant
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  4 in total

1.  A Note on the Poisson's Binomial Distribution in Item Response Theory.

Authors:  Jorge González; Marie Wiberg; Alina A von Davier
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-02-14

2.  Combined landscape of single-nucleotide variants and copy number alterations in clonal hematopoiesis.

Authors:  Ryunosuke Saiki; Yukihide Momozawa; Yasuhito Nannya; Masahiro M Nakagawa; Yotaro Ochi; Tetsuichi Yoshizato; Chikashi Terao; Yutaka Kuroda; Yuichi Shiraishi; Kenichi Chiba; Hiroko Tanaka; Atsushi Niida; Seiya Imoto; Koichi Matsuda; Takayuki Morisaki; Yoshinori Murakami; Yoichiro Kamatani; Shuichi Matsuda; Michiaki Kubo; Satoru Miyano; Hideki Makishima; Seishi Ogawa
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 53.440

3.  RUBIC identifies driver genes by detecting recurrent DNA copy number breaks.

Authors:  Ewald van Dyk; Marlous Hoogstraat; Jelle Ten Hoeve; Marcel J T Reinders; Lodewyk F A Wessels
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Detecting independent and recurrent copy number aberrations using interval graphs.

Authors:  Hsin-Ta Wu; Iman Hajirasouliha; Benjamin J Raphael
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-06-15       Impact factor: 6.937

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.